WBO2 on a 2000

Old 04-07-2009, 02:52 PM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
r2t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 25
Total Cats: 0
Question WBO2 on a 2000

K... Here's my question. Can I replace the pre-cat narrow band O2 sensor with the WB and can I do so without it throwing a code? Or would I be just better off welding a bung on the header for the WB and let the two NB sesnsors continue to do their thing. I have the LC-1 WBO2 kit.
r2t2 is offline  
Old 04-07-2009, 03:44 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Stein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
Default

Weld in a bung. I would suspect it will throw a code as the way the car tests cat efficiency is the difference between sensor one and sensor two. Take one out and it can't compare between the two.

Besides, bung one is likely too close to the turbo and would likely cook your WBO2 sensor sooner. Mine is right before the cat on my Begi pipe. It should be at least 18" downstream from the turbo. I know that some have run them closer but I wouldn't.
Stein is offline  
Old 04-07-2009, 03:54 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TravisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,547
Total Cats: 13
Default

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/s...C-1_Manual.pdf
Pg 18
TravisR is offline  
Old 04-07-2009, 04:46 PM
  #4  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
r2t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 25
Total Cats: 0
Default

Kewl guys...

Stein, I know that you're turbo'd, but I'm dealing with a SC and was wondering how far down stream I could mount the WB? My JR header is ceramic coated and I was thinking of putting the bung on mid pipe... Just fore of the cat but aft of where it bolts up to the header. Whatcha guys think.

I'm still debating which way to go...
r2t2 is offline  
Old 04-07-2009, 04:50 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Stein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
Default

Originally Posted by r2t2
Kewl guys...

I was thinking of putting the bung on mid pipe... Just fore of the cat but aft of where it bolts up to the header. Whatcha guys think.

I'm still debating which way to go...
That's where mine is as well. Right before the cat in the midpipe.
Stein is offline  
Old 04-07-2009, 05:03 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
samnavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: VaBch, VA
Posts: 6,451
Total Cats: 322
Default

The Adaptronic doesn't return OBDII codes as far as I know. You can pull the second sensor out of the car and plug the hole. Install the wideband in place of the first sensor and feed the wideband signal directly... the Adaptronic will like that better than NB. This is assuming you're using it standalone.

If you're running it parallel to the stock ECU and need it to return codes, then still install the LC1 in place of the first OEM sensor, and use the SIMULATED NARROWBAND OUTPUT of the LC1 to feed the stock ECU. Almost all name-brand widebands will output a narrowband specifically to feed stock ECU's that can't interpret a wideband signal.
samnavy is offline  
Old 04-07-2009, 05:53 PM
  #7  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,015
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
If you're running it parallel to the stock ECU and need it to return codes, then still install the LC1 in place of the first OEM sensor, and use the SIMULATED NARROWBAND OUTPUT of the LC1 to feed the stock ECU.
If he did that, then the ECU would still throw a code for heater open circuit. He could of course install a resistor across the heater line to satisfy the ECU in that regard, but in the end I'm with Stein here. Install a dedicated bung in the midpipe just fore of the cat. Makes it easy to route the cables as well- attach the LC1 to the PPF, and run the cables up through a slit in the large shift boot.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 04-07-2009, 08:05 PM
  #8  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
r2t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 25
Total Cats: 0
Default

Excellent info guys... Stein/Joe, I think you've convinced me to just install the WB on the mid pipe. I also spoke to one of the guys at FM and he felt that I would save myself a lot of hassles if I did it your way...

So, I defer to the experienced opinions...
r2t2 is offline  
Old 04-07-2009, 08:24 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Stein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
Default

Wow, I have been elevated to "experienced" and mentioned in the same breath as Joe. I truly am not worthy of such praise, while Joe definitely is.

Just hang around here a bit and you will be fine. I had never touched a turbo before January. What little I know I learned here from people waaay smarter about cars than I am.
Stein is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 04:49 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Jfornachon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chatsworth, SoCal
Posts: 948
Total Cats: 1
Default

I will most likely get scorned and flamed by who knows who, but here goes. I am going to be getting an Adaptronic soon. I would like to install a wideband in the factory location and retain the OEM sensor so that It wount throw a code. I can handle splicing and soldering things that is not a problem. This will be going into a 01 NBB.

I am looking into getting the AEM UEGO as the WB. I was thinking that I could wire up the sensor and run the guage and into the Adaptronic then jumper into the factory ECM so that the computer would not throw a code for no A/F readings. Is there even a code for that? Would it have any bearing on how the car would run without an A/F reading at the factory ECM?

I am not great at the electrical theory, but when a circuit is in parallel would not the voltage reading be the same no mater what branch of the circuit? Hence the reason that I was thinking of running a jumper.

Let me know your thoughts. Either way I don't care I just want to get some idea of which way to go. I would really like to not to start cutting my factory header. I there is somewhere that I can go to get more help please kick me in the right dirrection. Please don't just say install a bung. As I would like to figure this out. I will be going turbo soon Just have to save up some more money to get the kit installed properly.

Have a great day,
Jared

Last edited by Jfornachon; 11-25-2009 at 04:54 AM. Reason: spelling
Jfornachon is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 08:49 AM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Stein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
Default

The Bosch sensor likely won't live long that close to the head. Too hot there. The specifically recommend 24-36" downstream. Might be OK short term, but it is a $68 experiment. (IIRC, that is the replacement cost for the sensor).
Stein is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 10:47 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
dgmorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,446
Total Cats: 6
Default

Can the WB o2 sensor be installed in the factory location of the second sensor on the NB (non-turbo) if no cat is being used, or is this too far downstream?
dgmorr is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 12:11 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Jfornachon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chatsworth, SoCal
Posts: 948
Total Cats: 1
Default

As long as there is no cat, no exhaust leak, and is locatedin the specified location then yah why not.

Hav a great day,
Jared
Jfornachon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rustbucket
WTB
1
08-31-2020 11:30 PM
kr307
Meet and Greet
1
09-26-2015 10:33 AM
AdoboMiata
MEGAsquirt
4
09-22-2015 02:32 AM
skou
Miata parts for sale/trade
4
09-10-2015 09:44 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: WBO2 on a 2000



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.