Mazdaspeed meets EFR, ARTech, MS2E
10-20-2015, 03:20 PM
#284
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
Some more photos 
Overtaking a slower driver in the R32 and GT-R
That SM didn't give me a point-by for a whole other lap
Overtaking a slower driver in the R32 and GT-R
That SM didn't give me a point-by for a whole other lap
Last edited by FrankB; 10-20-2015 at 03:53 PM.
Reply
0
0
10-20-2015, 06:34 PM
#286
Hey, found your thread. Awesome build man, was cool to randomly run into someone from MT.net while I was visiting from the other side of the country for Global Time Attack.
I was taking video for a project pretty much the whole time but snapped these quick earlier in the day.
I was taking video for a project pretty much the whole time but snapped these quick earlier in the day.
Reply
0
0
10-21-2015, 07:16 AM
#287
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
It did I don't remember it getting above 185 period.
Oh hey man, thanks for the pictures. It was good talking with youyou. You really got me thinking about looking further into what classing I would fall under.
Here's some screen shots of my fastest lap of the weekend. My phone was out of storage space towards the end of day one and it only recorded data for this session so I don't have the video to go with this lap.
Current Spec Miata lap record is 1:59.96 for reference.
I do have a video of a 2:03 lap with data overlay I will try to post later. There's still obvious areas of improvement that I can make. I still brake too early, too lightly and then coast a bit into harder braking.
Hey, found your thread. Awesome build man, was cool to randomly run into someone from MT.net while I was visiting from the other side of the country for Global Time Attack.
I was taking video for a project pretty much the whole time but snapped these quick earlier in the day.
I was taking video for a project pretty much the whole time but snapped these quick earlier in the day.
Here's some screen shots of my fastest lap of the weekend. My phone was out of storage space towards the end of day one and it only recorded data for this session so I don't have the video to go with this lap.
Current Spec Miata lap record is 1:59.96 for reference.
I do have a video of a 2:03 lap with data overlay I will try to post later. There's still obvious areas of improvement that I can make. I still brake too early, too lightly and then coast a bit into harder braking.
Last edited by FrankB; 10-21-2015 at 09:45 AM.
Reply
0
0
10-21-2015, 09:52 AM
#290
Right on man. Yeah that track takes some ***** to brake late in a lot of areas, a lot of the braking zones have gnarly bumps that are definitely a challenge. It's just something that comes with seat time and being consistent and precise about picking and utilizing braking points/markers.
Here are the rules by the way. Like I said you would easily fit into street class with just a change of tires. There will be some changes for 2016 so if you do plan on coming out for the Road Atlanta event for Formula D weekend, keep an eye on them. 2015 Rules - Global Time Attack
That 2:00.00 theoretical time would have been enough to edge out 3rd place in street class assuming you could do that with RS3's and some additional seat time, not to mention you still have the ability to hit that plus key for some more power when it matters haha. Looking forward to the video!
Here are the rules by the way. Like I said you would easily fit into street class with just a change of tires. There will be some changes for 2016 so if you do plan on coming out for the Road Atlanta event for Formula D weekend, keep an eye on them. 2015 Rules - Global Time Attack
That 2:00.00 theoretical time would have been enough to edge out 3rd place in street class assuming you could do that with RS3's and some additional seat time, not to mention you still have the ability to hit that plus key for some more power when it matters haha. Looking forward to the video!
Reply
0
0
10-21-2015, 10:33 AM
#291
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
The OBD data overlay isn't 100% correct, II actually only shift at 3 points on the track: from 4th-6th then back to 4th on the front straight, to 5th on the back straight then back down to 4th right before turn 13(baby straight).
Reply
0
0
06-16-2016, 05:52 PM
#292
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
UPDATE:
So, I contacted Corky at BEGi after the thread about the benefits of their intake manifold started to get heated. There was mention of a third party tuning comparison and he asked if there was anyone willing to do so. I volunteered for the task and he liked my overall build and accepted my offer.
Below are the results of that comparison. The dyno used was a Dyno Dynamics and all runs were in 5th gear. (the actual numbers bummed me out a bit, I was expecting higher numbers but the tuner says the dyno reads low... I feel like they all say that though so I don't know anymore) The only part changed between runs was the intake manifold. (and necessary cold-side intercooler piping to mate up to the centrally placed TB on the bottom of the manifold.)
This graph compares WHP andTorque between the factory manifold and the BEGi.
This graph shows the WHP and Boost PSI (20PSI) between the factory manifold and the BEGi.
after I got the comparisons I upped the boost (Peaks at 26PSI and tapers to just under 22PSI) with the BEGi manifold and came up with:
So, I contacted Corky at BEGi after the thread about the benefits of their intake manifold started to get heated. There was mention of a third party tuning comparison and he asked if there was anyone willing to do so. I volunteered for the task and he liked my overall build and accepted my offer.
Below are the results of that comparison. The dyno used was a Dyno Dynamics and all runs were in 5th gear. (the actual numbers bummed me out a bit, I was expecting higher numbers but the tuner says the dyno reads low... I feel like they all say that though so I don't know anymore) The only part changed between runs was the intake manifold. (and necessary cold-side intercooler piping to mate up to the centrally placed TB on the bottom of the manifold.)
This graph compares WHP andTorque between the factory manifold and the BEGi.
This graph shows the WHP and Boost PSI (20PSI) between the factory manifold and the BEGi.
after I got the comparisons I upped the boost (Peaks at 26PSI and tapers to just under 22PSI) with the BEGi manifold and came up with:
Reply
0
0
06-16-2016, 06:09 PM
#293
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
To add another comparison... My previous dyno that I did on a Dynojet from when I had the Fab9 coils. The differences between the Dynojet run and the initial run on the Dyno Dynamics is as follows...
Dynojet
MS2e
Fab9 coils
19.6psi
Dyno Dynamics
MS3 Basic
LS2 Truck coils
20psi
AEM Water/Meth V2 (progressive from 11psi to full spray at 15psi)
Dynojet
MS2e
Fab9 coils
19.6psi
Dyno Dynamics
MS3 Basic
LS2 Truck coils
20psi
AEM Water/Meth V2 (progressive from 11psi to full spray at 15psi)
Reply
0
0
