Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Slowest turbo Miata ever

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2013, 12:13 PM
  #201  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

From what I understand if you are going for big turbo power and not running E85 you should go with 8.6:1 pistons. You will not be det limited and you can throw a **** ton of timing at it and make phenomenal power. I remember this discussion somewhere on this forum. I believe both Hustler and Savington said that 8.6:1 on pump gas will allow for the most head room.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 12:16 PM
  #202  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thenuge26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
I believe both Hustler and Savington said that 8.6:1 on pump gas will allow for the most head room.
This. I've never built an engine, but the TSE pistons page recommends 8.6:1 for their turbo builds. That's what I got, because Savington has probably built more turbo miata engines than just about everyone else on here. The MSM is 9.5:1 because it is an awful hack job that is more marketing than engineering.
thenuge26 is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 12:17 PM
  #203  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,947
Total Cats: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by Erat
We get pretty good gas around here very high quality 94. Plus i have a few stations that sell e85. Not that i would need e85 for 9.5:1. Just because it's that "little bit more" in case i ever want to do silly things and make a ton more power than my current goals. Plus that CR will make my quick spool even quicker, and i like that. With that being said, i have not found any actual data showing how much of a difference 9:1 and 9.5:1 really is. I'd assume there would be some, if i were to even notice i doubt it. Maybe someone can prove me wrong.

The plan was to tear town the engine and get everything measured and figured out before ordering pistons. Like Vlad said i'll probably not bore it over unless i have to. 83.5mm seems to be what everyone is doing.

Edit* lower compression, crank the timing? I'm afarid to add timing, i'm tuned way conservative now.
Like Ryan G said, if you think you might want to go for big power later, you want to start with lower compression. 9:1 is a nice medium because you've got enough compression that it runs good off boost, but it's not too high of compression. If you go 9.5:1 you won't be able to run as much boost down the road. Yes you'll have more area under the curve, quicker spool like you said, but the headroom isn't there if you go higher compression and don't run E85.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 12:45 PM
  #204  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Dont be afraid of timing, timing is good. Timing is wholesome. Super conservative timing burns exhaust valves.
Leafy is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 01:40 PM
  #205  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

Well. It sounds like a plan.
Erat is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 02:44 PM
  #206  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
krissetsfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 883
Total Cats: 56
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
Like Ryan G said, if you think you might want to go for big power later, you want to start with lower compression. 9:1 is a nice medium because you've got enough compression that it runs good off boost, but it's not too high of compression. If you go 9.5:1 you won't be able to run as much boost down the road. Yes you'll have more area under the curve, quicker spool like you said, but the headroom isn't there if you go higher compression and don't run E85.
Won't be able to run as much boost? Are you're talking more than 20psi? There are members here that have made 350whp on 9.5:1 w/ pump gas @ 20psi. I guess the Idea is you don't have to run as much boost if you have higher compression... The seesaw could go back and forth all day on this discussion though. It's preference. 8.5:1 all the way to 10:1 are all doable on pump gas. 10:1 having the smallest margin of error. 9.5:1 in my opinion is not a terrible option though.
krissetsfire is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 04:01 PM
  #207  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,947
Total Cats: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by krissetsfire
Won't be able to run as much boost? Are you're talking more than 20psi? There are members here that have made 350whp on 9.5:1 w/ pump gas @ 20psi. I guess the Idea is you don't have to run as much boost if you have higher compression... The seesaw could go back and forth all day on this discussion though. It's preference. 8.5:1 all the way to 10:1 are all doable on pump gas. 10:1 having the smallest margin of error. 9.5:1 in my opinion is not a terrible option though.
I'm not putting a solid number on boost. If you want to run high boost, you will run it higher and safer with low compression. 9:1 is a great combination for this, as illustrated by the many cars that are well-built this way. There are members here who are putting out over 300 whp on a 1.6 with a 2560, but it's not the easiest/safest/best way to go. Yes you can make mad powers on 9.5:1 but Erat likes to play it safe, and if you're gonna put out lots of power safely, you're better off to go lower compression.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com

Last edited by turbofan; 02-07-2013 at 04:02 PM. Reason: first sentence was retarded
turbofan is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 06:25 PM
  #208  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

Yeah, i want to be able to drive this car cross country, beat the **** out of it, then drive back.

Sustaining 35mpg highway would also be nice.
Erat is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:38 AM
  #209  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,309
Total Cats: 98
Default

The higher the static compression, generally, the better the BSFC.

In that case, if your goal is higher cruising mpg's then go for the 10:1 CR...
Efini~FC3S is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:45 AM
  #210  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,947
Total Cats: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by Efini~FC3S
The higher the static compression, generally, the better the BSFC.

In that case, if your goal is higher cruising mpg's then go for the 10:1 CR...
This is also true. Lower comp will mean lower MPG. It can still be quite good, but I can't see 35 mpg. 30 though, sure.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:57 AM
  #211  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thenuge26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
Default

lol@ talking about MPG when building a high horsepower turbo engine.

What snail are you thinking about running Erat? Waiting on the TSE kit like me?
thenuge26 is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 11:00 AM
  #212  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,947
Total Cats: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
lol@ talking about MPG when building a high horsepower turbo engine.

What snail are you thinking about running Erat? Waiting on the TSE kit like me?
Why lol at MPG when building a high horsepower turbo engine? If you do it right, there's no reason you can't have decent MPG when you're not on it, and amazing power when you are. Yeah if you're talking about 500hp then sure, that's pushing it.

Dillon, did you ever ride in Bryan's car? Is yours the fastest Miata you've ridden in? you might have to take mine for a spin when the weather clears up (if I still have it). 300hp would be fun but I don't really feel like I need any more than I have right now. 400 hp just seems silly!
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 02:29 PM
  #213  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,309
Total Cats: 98
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
lol@ talking about MPG when building a high horsepower turbo engine.


Yes, you can have your cake and eat it too...
Efini~FC3S is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 03:17 PM
  #214  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
This is also true. Lower comp will mean lower MPG. It can still be quite good, but I can't see 35 mpg. 30 though, sure.
I netted 35mpg with me, a passenger, and a full trunk of stuff returning from the dragon. Oh, and i had a good crosswind. I drove like an old man 65mph, and ever got into boost. But still. What's "high HP". To me high is like 500hp. But a normal 300hp (what i seem to be pretty reasonable) should still get great gas mileage just fine. I did all that ^ on 200hp. Nothing in my setup will change except engine internals. I don't see how my MPG would be affected except positively with the upped CR.

Originally Posted by thenuge26
lol@ talking about MPG when building a high horsepower turbo engine.

What snail are you thinking about running Erat? Waiting on the TSE kit like me?
Going to keep the gt2560, with FM log manifold i currently have on it. I bought a bigger intercooler from Bryan, just waiting to hear back from him.

Originally Posted by turbofan
Why lol at MPG when building a high horsepower turbo engine? If you do it right, there's no reason you can't have decent MPG when you're not on it, and amazing power when you are. Yeah if you're talking about 500hp then sure, that's pushing it.

Dillon, did you ever ride in Bryan's car? Is yours the fastest Miata you've ridden in? you might have to take mine for a spin when the weather clears up (if I still have it). 300hp would be fun but I don't really feel like I need any more than I have right now. 400 hp just seems silly!
I'm not going to build around MPG, that's silly. But i wouldn't be mad if i could retain my 35mpg highway. Like i said, i want to be able to drive this thing somewhere. Nor am i shooting for 500hp.

My car is not the fastest miata i've been in. I was in a built engine, gt2860, begi S4 car on 30psi. BUT like all begi manifolds he blew a crack in it (on what i believe he said was his 4th manifold). Though, when i rode in it, we were on the dragon, so all the power was not usable. But it did feel good. Still haven't been in Bryan's, not sure i want to ruin his seats.

My main dilemma will be: Do i want to try and make the 5 speed last, or just shoot for the stars, blow it up, and find a 6 speed... Hmmm. Also my clutch is rated for 318ft/lb... We'll see.
Erat is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 03:32 PM
  #215  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Well damn... that sounds like a tall order buddy.

My car has never seen higher than 25mpg, even on a whole highway tank.


And a fun and highly useless comparison, my MX6 makes more power, has a MUCH lower compression ratio (7.8:1), weighs more, and is shaped like a brick. 41mpg on the highway.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 03:37 PM
  #216  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thenuge26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
Default

If you run ALLOFIT out of that GT2560 your clutch will definitely be fine (still overkill actually) and unless you beat it your 5-speed should survive. But running ALLOFIT at 9.5:1 will not be easy to tune.
thenuge26 is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 04:21 PM
  #217  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,947
Total Cats: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
Well damn... that sounds like a tall order buddy.

My car has never seen higher than 25mpg, even on a whole highway tank.


And a fun and highly useless comparison, my MX6 makes more power, has a MUCH lower compression ratio (7.8:1), weighs more, and is shaped like a brick. 41mpg on the highway.
Why don't we all drive these ugly things? Sounds like magic.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 04:39 PM
  #218  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,309
Total Cats: 98
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
Well damn... that sounds like a tall order buddy.

My car has never seen higher than 25mpg, even on a whole highway tank.


And a fun and highly useless comparison, my MX6 makes more power, has a MUCH lower compression ratio (7.8:1), weighs more, and is shaped like a brick. 41mpg on the highway.
Sounds like your MX6 has a better tune than your miata...
Efini~FC3S is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 09:42 AM
  #219  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by Efini~FC3S
Sounds like your MX6 has a better tune than your miata...
My MX6 runs horrible piggybacks that if i were to go into full detail of, would bring down the wrath of the MT.net gods upon my brow.

My MSM was tuned in-house by FM, the gods of turbo Miatas.

concealer404 is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 01:45 PM
  #220  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,309
Total Cats: 98
Default

I thought your MX6 had like three HKS F-con units, or something like that.

I don't think FM are gods of turbo Miatas...

Last edited by Efini~FC3S; 02-11-2013 at 01:46 PM. Reason: Grammar cat was po'd
Efini~FC3S is offline  


Quick Reply: Slowest turbo Miata ever



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.