Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Breaking news from Fukushima!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2011, 07:09 PM
  #1  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default Breaking news from Fukushima!

Nothing terribly dramatic is happening!

Ok, so that's not really breaking news... Just trying to keep fear alive.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-11-2011, 08:11 PM
  #2  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I **** myself in anticipation
18psi is offline  
Old 05-12-2011, 02:33 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
nickblackbelt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: frederick MD
Posts: 341
Total Cats: -6
Default

^also lol
nickblackbelt is offline  
Old 05-12-2011, 02:42 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
spitefulcheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 277
Total Cats: 3
Default

troll'd
spitefulcheerio is offline  
Old 05-12-2011, 03:08 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
buffon01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
Default

Name:  tumblr_lkq9ivfGPS1qhnax6.jpg
Views: 59
Size:  22.9 KB
buffon01 is offline  
Old 05-12-2011, 05:29 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Bryce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
Default

Bryce is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 05:09 PM
  #7  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Ok, so in all seriousness, it is official that all three of the damaged reactors at Fuku have achieved a cold-shutdown state. This is defined as a condition in which the reactor vessel is both at ambient pressure and below the boiling point of water, and requires no forced coolant circulation in order to maintain the stability of the core. In this state, a reactor is "passively safe," meaning that no human interaction is required for it to remain in a stable condition.

Obviously, the fact that the reactor vessels have sustained damage and continue to leak into the wetwell and suppression pools requires that some water be pumped back up into the vessels in order to maintain coverage of the fuel. But aside from that (and the fact that cleanup and decommissioning is going to take a while) the "crisis" is basically at an end.

Radiation at the plant's boundary is presently around 0.1 mSv/year, which is about one-eighth the amount of radiation emitted by the granite structure of the US Capitol building (source).
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 05:52 PM
  #8  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

We were talking about Fukushima today.
hustler is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 05:55 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Ok, so in all seriousness, it is official that all three of the damaged reactors at Fuku have achieved a cold-shutdown state. This is defined as a condition in which the reactor vessel is both at ambient pressure and below the boiling point of water, and requires no forced coolant circulation in order to maintain the stability of the core. In this state, a reactor is "passively safe," meaning that no human interaction is required for it to remain in a stable condition.

Obviously, the fact that the reactor vessels have sustained damage and continue to leak into the wetwell and suppression pools requires that some water be pumped back up into the vessels in order to maintain coverage of the fuel. But aside from that (and the fact that cleanup and decommissioning is going to take a while) the "crisis" is basically at an end.

Radiation at the plant's boundary is presently around 0.1 mSv/year, which is about one-eighth the amount of radiation emitted by the granite structure of the US Capitol building (source).
You know, Joe. What they SHOULD do (And time for politics!) is make it so there is much more radiation in the US Capitol building!

Sure, you'll be fine for the first few years. But don't plan on a lifetime as a Senator unless you are really devoted.

I would find it personally hilarious. It would certainly change the face of politics. "Join Congress, be there for a lifetime, GET CANCER!"
blaen99 is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 05:58 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Radiation at the plant's boundary is presently around 0.1 mSv/year, which is about one-eighth the amount of radiation emitted by the granite structure of the US Capitol building (source).
Headline:
US Capitol building radioactive!
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 07:03 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,593
Total Cats: 1,259
Default

All granite buildings emit some radiation. Must be why gov't workers are such slackers.
rleete is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 07:11 PM
  #12  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Oh, and I should add:

The death-toll from the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant remains at two. (Two workers were trapped in the basement of one of the buildings when it flooded, and they drowned.)

Unless you believe this rather questionable story, which claims that Fuku is responsible for 14,000 deaths in the US. When I read things like that, I have to ask myself "Does the person who wrote this actually believe what they are saying?"
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 08:08 PM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gearhead_318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
Default

I want Penn and Teller to do an episode about this on "Bullshit!".
gearhead_318 is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 08:28 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,593
Total Cats: 1,259
Default

Sheesh, Joe. Do you think you could find a more biased site? That place screams "tree huggers".

Not that it's true, but all the fellow t-huggers will believe it is.
rleete is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:38 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
lordrigamus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tinley Park, IL
Posts: 1,482
Total Cats: 0
Default

I guess I'll go unpack my zombie apocalypse box now since all near future mutations have been averted.
lordrigamus is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 11:17 AM
  #16  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by rleete
Sheesh, Joe. Do you think you could find a more biased site?
Doubtful. It took me a while to find that one. I suppose it's possible that a more alarmist and poorly-informed article exists somewhere, but if so, it eluded my Googling skills.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 11:32 AM
  #17  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Seefo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,961
Total Cats: 48
Default

You might not have tried hard enough. I don't know if this is worse, or just funnier:
http://www.survival-quiz.com/?p=2337

MILLIONS OF TONS OF RADIOACTIVE WATER (I predict .01 million tons, or better yet .00001 quadrillion tons):
http://www.survival-quiz.com/?p=2420

BETTER. Fukushima will kill us all guys. It really will. Just give it about 10 million years.:
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo...age1638679/pg1

If you believe the forum above to be true, then this German guy outdid hitler!:
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/one...pill-combined/
Seefo is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 11:36 AM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Seefo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,961
Total Cats: 48
Default

Just to clarify, in all seriousness. I have seen news articles quote anywhere from 45 tons to 14,000 tons of radioactive water.

That's....a far cry from millions of tons.
Seefo is offline  
Old 09-16-2013, 10:08 AM
  #19  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

So 2 years later, what's the epilogue?

Any truth to the idea that migratory fish caught in CA have unacceptable radiation levels?
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 09-16-2013, 10:36 AM
  #20  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,176
Total Cats: 1,680
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
So 2 years later, what's the epilogue?
**** is still fucked up.
shuiend is offline  


Quick Reply: Breaking news from Fukushima!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM.