DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

22PSI, 260WHP/246WTQ, WTF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2014, 03:27 PM
  #21  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
The meth is evolutionary baggage from the days of carbs and turbos and no intercoolers.
Actually, it's evolutionary from the days of pistons the size of large coffee cans powering bombers full of scared-18 year olds fighting *****. Alcohol was used as an anti-freeze agent to handle the temperatures those aircraft encountered.
hornetball is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 03:30 PM
  #22  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slmhofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 400
Total Cats: 23
Default

And some pictures for your viewing pleasure.

Need to clean up a few loose wires still (oil temp, det can hose, old spray motor leads). Red/black wires very top by wipers is temp motor spray activation LED.


My tuning tools.
Attached Thumbnails 22PSI, 260WHP/246WTQ, WTF?-20140405_120741_hdr.jpg   22PSI, 260WHP/246WTQ, WTF?-20140405_120139_hdr.jpg  
slmhofy is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 03:33 PM
  #23  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
matthewdesigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: WNC
Posts: 1,648
Total Cats: 55
Default

Just spitballing here:

How low on the block is the mount bracket? And is there any chance you are actually picking up some noise from the chassis or engine movement instead of actual knock?

I'm not at all familiar with the NB 1.8, but on the NA 1.6 the vestigial knock sensor mount (carried over from the GTX) is just under the head, between cyls 2&3.
matthewdesigns is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 03:35 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
Nope nope nope
You have that completely *** backwards

Almost everybody running water/meth injection would be better off with just water (with a touch of alcohol added to kill algae). The meth is evolutionary baggage from the days of carbs and turbos and no intercoolers.
Meth itself is really only useful to add fuel. Ecoboost Ford guys use it to compensate for a direct injection HPFP that is done after just a tune. Water is where it is at to quell knock.

Originally Posted by 18psi
btw your ait's aren't really an indication of low exhaust pressure, that's an indication of how well your heat exchanger is working.
This. A pressure gauge in the exhaust mani would give you some info, but an EGT gauge would be much more informative in your case OP.

Originally Posted by concealer404
I don't think the MSM stuff is a restriction in this case. This is purely tuning or motor issues. (Hopefully not.)

Ask vteckiller.
The MSM stuff is a hindrance to efficiency and spool, but it only minimally effects knock threshold in my experience. I can run just about the same timing on my MSM as I could in my old BEGI 2554 car.

Originally Posted by slmhofy
And yes, I think I hear det any time I add more timing than what I've got in my spark map now in regards to the top 2 rows. The rest of the map runs great.
Your timing curve is way gross in those rows. IMHO, you are too heavy handed in the lower boost ones and they should be flattened out some.

Originally Posted by slmhofy
Yeah. How much power are you making? Timing/gas/boost?

I think if I was able to get the timing up where it "should" be (15-18 w/water), I'd be over 300 by now. Aka my long term goal.
We don't have good gas anymore and no 93 octane here so I run self blended 94 octane. It is ethanol free 91 mixed with a little e85, ~10% ethanol content total. I run ~15-17* timing at 183 kpa and ~13-15* at 212kpa with no knock, but I have run out of fuel without an e85 station near and when I put in 91 octane I got knock above 11 psi boost.

I would peg it at about 250 rw-dynojet-hp but I have not been able to get it on a dyno since putting in the clutch that wouldn't slip at 16 psi and the 3.6 gears.

Last edited by vteckiller2000; 04-05-2014 at 05:51 PM.
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 05:29 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slmhofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 400
Total Cats: 23
Default

I've got those 2 upper rows set like that for testing knock. I set the timing in boost and know exactly what it's going to be. No interpolation between this and that. Once I much better understand what my motor wants, I'll make them look better.
slmhofy is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 05:30 PM
  #26  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
Actually, it's evolutionary from the days of pistons the size of large coffee cans powering bombers full of scared-18 year olds fighting *****. Alcohol was used as an anti-freeze agent to handle the temperatures those aircraft encountered.
Exactly. It stayed around because guys were turbo'ing stuff with carbs or later with shitty baindaids and there was a need for fuel enrichment. Now we have real EMS and dont need fuel enrichment, and we have big cheap intercoolers and dont need the volatility of meth to lower IATs.

It blows my mind that people still do a 50/50 mix and then either pull fuel out of their tune or just deal with black smoke belching 10.0:1 AFRs.
All the Mustang retards do this and then **** their pants when anybody (me) tries to suggest otherwise. Telling them not to mix meth in makes them almost as mad as the idea of gays marrying.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 05:36 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slmhofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 400
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by matthewdesigns
Just spitballing here:

How low on the block is the mount bracket? And is there any chance you are actually picking up some noise from the chassis or engine movement instead of actual knock?

I'm not at all familiar with the NB 1.8, but on the NA 1.6 the vestigial knock sensor mount (carried over from the GTX) is just under the head, between cyls 2&3.
This is where I have the copper tube bolted on my car.

Attached Thumbnails 22PSI, 260WHP/246WTQ, WTF?-starter%252520bracket.jpg  
slmhofy is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 05:46 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
05pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 344
Total Cats: 8
Default

slmhofy - your ms.com thread references a small 16G:

"MHI (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries) - TD05H (frame size) - small 16G (compressor size)
For simplicity, the term “16G” is used in referencing anything having to do with the Mitsubishi turbo in the rest of this article."

Are you running a small 16G or an EVOIII 16G wheel?
05pearl is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 05:51 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default

05Pearl would be a good resource for the OP. ^^^^
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 05:56 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default

What did you do the the head/combustion chambers? You simply should not have knock where you are in this engine. You have some sort of mechanical problem causing knock or the perception of knock.
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 05:58 PM
  #31  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
05pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 344
Total Cats: 8
Default

Originally Posted by vteckiller2000
05Pearl would be a good resource for the OP. ^^^^
Yep, I've already been in contact with him, to a small extent. I am running the BNR EVOIII 16G modified MSM turbo.

Ok, I see now you are running the EVOIII wheel - thanks for the clarification.

For clarification for others in the thread - I'm basically running the same turbo as slmhofy. I'm right at 300whp on 91oct at 5200' altitude. I do however have a ported head and VVT. Would that make up for a 40whp difference? I don't know.
05pearl is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:15 PM
  #32  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slmhofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 400
Total Cats: 23
Default

How audible should the ping/knock be with det cans?

I originally had the cheap *** Harbor Freight stethoscope setup, but that **** would hurt my hears. Physically and through how loud the engine noise was. With this setup now, it's much more quieter. Just wondering how loud the PING should be when it does show up. Is it muffled, faint, loud, sharp. Just want to be sure of what I'm trying not to hear.
slmhofy is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:27 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default

Originally Posted by slmhofy
How audible should the ping/knock be with det cans?

I originally had the cheap *** Harbor Freight stethoscope setup, but that **** would hurt my hears. Physically and through how loud the engine noise was. With this setup now, it's much more quieter. Just wondering how loud the PING should be when it does show up. Is it muffled, faint, loud, sharp. Just want to be sure of what I'm trying not to hear.
You can easily hear it without the det cans.
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 07:42 PM
  #34  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
matthewdesigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: WNC
Posts: 1,648
Total Cats: 55
Default

Originally Posted by slmhofy
This is where I have the copper tube bolted on my car.
It seems that the consensus thus far is that you ought to be able to run more timing, so ensuring that you are actually hearing knock (since you don't have a knock sensor to log) would be beneficial. If you are hearing other crap through the cans and limiting the timing because of that, you are leaving a lot on the table.

My : I'd move the tube to a "dedicated" location with no other attachments, perhaps the bung above the oil pressure sending unit if that is threaded. The less you have interfering with the signal the cleaner it'll be.

Do you have a real oil pressure gauge? A lot of people say they see the needle will bounce with detonation, are you seeing that?
matthewdesigns is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 09:40 PM
  #35  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

Hmm...

So i read through this thread and i don't understand.
22psi and only 260hp?
Caused by bad tune and crappy hotside parts?

Still doesn't seem right.

He's not running much less timing than i did when i made 260hp at only 12psi. Granted i have a different turbo, but i still have a cast log manifold, and cast turndown / mixing housing...
Erat is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 09:57 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slmhofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 400
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by matthewdesigns
It seems that the consensus thus far is that you ought to be able to run more timing, so ensuring that you are actually hearing knock (since you don't have a knock sensor to log) would be beneficial. If you are hearing other crap through the cans and limiting the timing because of that, you are leaving a lot on the table.

My : I'd move the tube to a "dedicated" location with no other attachments, perhaps the bung above the oil pressure sending unit if that is threaded. The less you have interfering with the signal the cleaner it'll be.

Do you have a real oil pressure gauge? A lot of people say they see the needle will bounce with detonation, are you seeing that?
I will look into moving the detcan tube.

And I have a real oil pressure Sender, and the gauge has been modified to more accurately show pressure differentials, but the gauge is still internally dampened, which I think would make it very numb to knock. It reacts pretty slowly to pressure changes.
slmhofy is offline  
Old 04-06-2014, 12:18 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default

Originally Posted by slmhofy
I will look into moving the detcan tube.

And I have a real oil pressure Sender, and the gauge has been modified to more accurately show pressure differentials, but the gauge is still internally dampened, which I think would make it very numb to knock. It reacts pretty slowly to pressure changes.
Only a stock oil pressure sensor from an NA does this. An aftermarket one will have a different sensor that is not prone or as prone to interference from the pressure wave interference they are talking about.
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Old 04-06-2014, 02:53 PM
  #38  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
StratoBlue1109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 74
Total Cats: 5
Default

Engines don't knock AND make more power. If you think it's false knock (which it likely is), rent an hour or two of dyno time, add a degree or so at a time and watch the power increase. When the gains start slowing down, you're good.

Then throw away your det cans.
StratoBlue1109 is offline  
Old 04-06-2014, 04:42 PM
  #39  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slmhofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 400
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by StratoBlue1109
Engines don't knock AND make more power. If you think it's false knock (which it likely is), rent an hour or two of dyno time, add a degree or so at a time and watch the power increase. When the gains start slowing down, you're good.

Then throw away your det cans.
I gained around 30whp the last time I added 4 degrees across peak boost cells(8deg changed to 12deg). I backed it down a couple degrees to where I am now with 2psi more boost.

So if everything else is working correctly, our engines should stop making power by adding more timing at full boost before it knocks?
slmhofy is offline  
Old 04-06-2014, 05:08 PM
  #40  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
StratoBlue1109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 74
Total Cats: 5
Default

Whether it knocks or not is relative to the fuel being used, or rather the octane content.

It's possible to have more octane than a engine requires and adding timing will just put you on the back side of the MBT peak. In that case you will generally lose power and not hear any knock. This is because the flame front is moving too slowly and still never reaches the piston on the top of the up stroke.

My post was in regards to your original post where you said "increasing timing improves my engine's performance, but I hear knock" (paraphrasing).

If increasing timing improves power, then it's not knocking. Whatever you're hearing is something else in the drivetrain that is resonating near the same frequency.


The fact that performance is increasing, means that your timing was too conservative and the flame front was chasing the piston down the bore. Increasing the timing allows the flame front to reach the piston just as it starts to make the down stroke on the combustion cycle, making use of all of the fuel's thermal energy. Catching the piston at this very moment is referred to as MBT (maximum brake torque). Generally we tune to just before MBT, for safety.

Knock happens when the ignition timing is too aggressive and the expanding flame front hits the piston as it's still on the up stroke (compression). The pressure of the flame front pressing against the piston, that is still moving up, means that a large mount of the thermal energy of the fuel is wasted trying to stop the pistons up stroke. So you will see less power output on a dyno and you will very likely hear knock as the engines internal tolerances are overcome and hard parts are actually touching each other. This is what generally causes spun rod bearings and catastrophic engine failures.

So, engines don't knock AND make more power.
StratoBlue1109 is offline  


Quick Reply: 22PSI, 260WHP/246WTQ, WTF?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.