DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Abandoned build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2016, 12:44 PM
  #61  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

and im sure you've run through this right?

Megasquirt Serial Setup
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 01:42 PM
  #62  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pretending2koolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Default

...probably would help if my battery was hooked up. I also submitted my application for R-tard of the year award, they said they couldn't accept it because I bring down the name of R-tards everywhere.
Pretending2koolz is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 07:11 PM
  #63  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pretending2koolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Default AFR

I'm pretty sure i got this down but need to make sure,
Red-Key on power
Black-Ground
White-White O2 sensor wire
Blue-Not used

It's an AEM UEGO
Pretending2koolz is offline  
Old 04-13-2016, 09:13 PM
  #64  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pretending2koolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Default *#UPDATE#*

Runs like a champ...Except the whole 10.0 afr @ idle. I think I'm a tune away from a whole car.
Pretending2koolz is offline  
Old 04-13-2016, 09:37 PM
  #65  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Huntington, Indiana
Posts: 2,885
Total Cats: 616
Default

Are you tuning manually at idle?
Monk is offline  
Old 04-13-2016, 11:25 PM
  #66  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pretending2koolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Default

Im only the base tune that came preloaded on megasquirt, I did set the gm iat and set the setting for wideband
Pretending2koolz is offline  
Old 04-21-2016, 12:23 PM
  #67  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pretending2koolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Default









So thats what I got, I finished way behind scedule, dyno day is May 3
Attached Thumbnails Abandoned build-80-20160419_004902_40e9cd5de2b961d36e25ea15554aab0aef6ec316.jpg   Abandoned build-80-20160419_004421_00a33faa583bf7e6cb1d8ad3962a3107dbe93747.jpg   Abandoned build-80-20160419_004304_7d50eb84e30ac683ea5c4ef5a4ae3aa610bdcb01.jpg   Abandoned build-80-20160419_004216_9288b5fee987a68822e6167b328c7beb9251e552.jpg  
Pretending2koolz is offline  
Old 04-21-2016, 07:16 PM
  #68  
Newb
 
calcard94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2
Total Cats: 0
Default

Is your wastegate pressure source post-throttle body? Some argue that vacuum is damaging for the diaphragm and the pressure drop across the intercooler can cause an unreliable signal.

Does the compressor housing have a place for a fitting?
calcard94 is offline  
Old 04-21-2016, 09:09 PM
  #69  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by calcard94
Is your wastegate pressure source post-throttle body? Some argue that vacuum is damaging for the diaphragm and the pressure drop across the intercooler can cause an unreliable signal.

Does the compressor housing have a place for a fitting?
I can't speak to the "vacuum can damage the can" argument (never heard that one before), but for optimal performance, the signal MUST be taken from a point after the intercooler. Pressure drop across the intercooler increases as a function of mass flow, and you want to account for that in the boost control. Far from being "unreliable," a post-intercooler source is far more stable (with regard to MAP) than a pre-intercooler source.

While most turbochargers can accommodate a wastegate signal directly at the compressor, this is the worst possible location to take it from.

For more information, read: https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo...eed-ebc-47532/



EDIT: didn't mean to **** on your first post after 2 years lurking. Welcome.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 04-21-2016, 09:40 PM
  #70  
Newb
 
calcard94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I can't speak to the "vacuum can damage the can" argument (never heard that one before),
I've seen it in a few places, including stickies in other forums such as The basics of boost control, wastegates and how to turn up the boost.
"Allowing a diaphragm-type wastegate to see boost and vacuum in quick succession or vacuum at all will wreak havoc on the diaphragm. The diaphragm is not designed to see vacuum or cycle between vacuum and boost. I'm not sure how much this shortens the life of the diaphragm, but the wear is significant."

It may be rubbish.. but it was something that I once read and clearly took it as truth. It sounds like you've had experience to the contrary?

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
but for optimal performance, the signal MUST be taken from a point after the intercooler. Pressure drop across the intercooler increases as a function of mass flow, and you want to account for that in the boost control. Far from being "unreliable," a post-intercooler source is far more stable (with regard to MAP) than a pre-intercooler source.

While most turbochargers can accommodate a wastegate signal directly at the compressor, this is the worst possible location to take it from.

EDIT: didn't mean to **** on your first post after 2 years lurking. Welcome.
Ha. As a long time lurker, I well expected my early posts to be shot down. How could I possibly start contributing value without having first been hazed?

I may need to reconsider my own set up then.. Many kits off the shelf have you reference from the compressor housing.. I feel like it wouldn't be difficult to have a boost source tapped into the cold side cooler piping, so why don't manufacturers do this? (Begi's AO kit, for instance, ships with a hose barb for the comp housing).
calcard94 is offline  
Old 04-21-2016, 10:46 PM
  #71  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by calcard94
I've seen it in a few places, including stickies in other forums such as The basics of boost control, wastegates and how to turn up the boost.
"Allowing a diaphragm-type wastegate to see boost and vacuum in quick succession or vacuum at all will wreak havoc on the diaphragm. The diaphragm is not designed to see vacuum or cycle between vacuum and boost. I'm not sure how much this shortens the life of the diaphragm, but the wear is significant."

It may be rubbish.. but it was something that I once read and clearly took it as truth. It sounds like you've had experience to the contrary?
No experience, only theory.

I actually agree with you that the wastegate signal should not be taken post-throttle, but for an entirely unrelated reason: this setup disassociates the effective maximum boost setpoint (pre-TB) from the actual manifold pressure (post-TB) and does nothing but generate surplus heat and waste energy when you're operating the engine at part-throttle under sustained heavy load (eg: driving up a hill in steady cruise.)



Originally Posted by calcard94
I may need to reconsider my own set up then.. Many kits off the shelf have you reference from the compressor housing.. I feel like it wouldn't be difficult to have a boost source tapped into the cold side cooler piping, so why don't manufacturers do this? (Begi's AO kit, for instance, ships with a hose barb for the comp housing).
Most, perhaps nearly all turbochargers come with this fitting. Why? It's cheap, it's convenient, and if you're using an electronic boost controller then it's a fine place to source the operating pressure from. And it doesn't cause any harm per se (to the contrary, it's nearly idiot-proof), it just causes MAP to taper off as RPM increases. If you want to avoid that, then you take the pressure reference from a point as near to the throttle body as possible.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 12:41 AM
  #72  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

I like this guy. Subscribed.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 04-24-2016, 12:34 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mazpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Trailer County
Posts: 531
Total Cats: -18
Default

A T3/T4 is fine, I ran it on a BP with 10.0@1 pistons. Good for cruisin and a beast at 15 psi on a .63 outlet.

Yes, the aluminum pulley, throw it away, get the best harmonic balancer possible. When I did my swap I forgot I had a aluminum pulley from my NA build.
Blew up oil pump within 2 months, lost complete engine, metal gears got into the engine, crank, oil pan, a disaster.

I dont have the car anymore, but I recommend high compression with a T3/T4, forged rods, and a good tune, MS, etc.
mazpr is offline  
Old 04-24-2016, 01:39 PM
  #74  
Junior Member
 
omnia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 1
Default

Is your intercooler pipe coming up between the radiator and sway bar? Some argue you are at risk of having the piping chewed through. And your intake temps might suffer.
omnia is offline  
Old 04-24-2016, 03:37 PM
  #75  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pretending2koolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Default

It is between the swaybar, only fitment I could find. Temps will suffer a little, I'm averaging +20 degrees, ie 64 outside yesterday 84 iat
Pretending2koolz is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 08:45 AM
  #76  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
90civichhb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 542
Total Cats: 36
Default

You may want to consider moving your Wideband O2 sensor. Most manufactures want you to place it further down the exhaust.
90civichhb is offline  
Old 04-30-2016, 09:07 PM
  #77  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pretending2koolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Default

So on my first logging run I hit 137 kpa@6800, which is pretty much 20 psi so I went in and set my boost limit to 111 kpa(about 6500 rpm) to keep from burning my motor before I dyno it. Needless to say, it works, just don't know how well for how long.

Last edited by Pretending2koolz; 04-30-2016 at 09:11 PM. Reason: incorrect unit
Pretending2koolz is offline  
Old 04-30-2016, 09:26 PM
  #78  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

Are you subtracting 100 KPA for atmo? Cuz if not, 137 KPA is like... Not a lot of boost...
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 04-30-2016, 09:43 PM
  #79  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pretending2koolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
Are you subtracting 100 KPA for atmo? Cuz if not, 137 KPA is like... Not a lot of boost...
I am not, but I dont know if it figures for that in the logger....so here is this...
Attached Thumbnails Abandoned build-80-run1_ef8a4ca4b52e0dedac498ce247753a4d8737b33f.png  
Pretending2koolz is offline  
Old 04-30-2016, 09:44 PM
  #80  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

Yeah you're running less than 6 psi
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  


Quick Reply: Abandoned build



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 AM.