DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2010, 03:32 PM
  #1  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,023
Total Cats: 6,591
Default Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.

This topic has been coming up every now and then. Specifically, a lot of folks seem to be having boost curves that look like this, and perceive it as justification for the fact that their manual boost controller just isn't cutting it, and they need to go out and spend money on a fancy electronic boost controller.



So, does that look familiar? If so, save your money. Fixing this problem is going to cost you about $3.

First, let's take a look at why this is happening. Here's a simplified diagram of your turbo system, where we have the turbocharger itself, then the intercooler, and then the throttle body.



Point "A" in this system is where a lot of folks have their boost controller connected. It's that nipple that came from the factory on the side of your compressor housing, probably with a hose already attached between it and the wastegate actuator.

Well, that's just stupid.

What's happening here is that your boost controller is in fact maintaining a constant level of boost, however it's doing it in the wrong place. Specifically, it's maintaining a constant level of boost at the compressor, but that's not what your engine is actually seeing.

Confused?



Yes, behold the simple drinking straw. Solver of great mysteries.

Here's a quick experiment. Stick a drinking straw into your pie-hole, and blow through it. Not too hard, very gently in fact. Very, very gently. This ain't Hustler's mom we're dealing with.

Feel the resistance that the straw is offering? No? Of course not. At the rate at which you are blowing into it, the straw is not much of a restriction at all.

Now, blow harder. And now you start to feel the straw fighting you.

A funny thing happens when we try to flow a gas through a restrictive orifice. The more we try to flow through the restriction, the more restrictive it becomes. In practical terms, at low rates of flow, we get very little pressure loss across the restriction. As flow increases, so does the pressure loss. And it's not linear, either. The magnitude of pressure drop increases almost exponentially with flow rate.

Now, it may not look like one, but your intercooler is a drinking straw. A large, heavy, aluminum, multi-faceted drinking straw. Or, at least, it exhibits a lot of the same characteristics as one. So, back to the diagram:



Say that we have our boost controller set such that we see a peak of 12 PSI in the intake manifold. At 4,000 RPM, we reach that point. We are, incidentally, flowing about 130 CFM through the intercooler (our engine has a 100% VE at all speeds) and we're loosing about 1 PSI across the intercooler. So while the pressure at point B is 12 PSI, the pressure at point A (which is what the boost controller is seeing) is actually 13 PSI.

Now, we increase the speed to 7,000 RPM. At this point, we're moving about 220 CFM, and yet, what's this? The pressure drop across the intercooler has increased to 3 PSI! We didn't even double the flow, and yet we tripled the drop. (Well, I'm ignoring the fact that these are relative, rather than absolute pressure values, but you get the idea.) So now, even though the MBC is faithfully holding 13 PSI at the compressor, we're only seeing 10 PSI at the manifold.


The solution here should be pretty obvious by now. Move the boost controller from point A to point B.

By doing this, we are now telling the boost controller, in essence, "Hey, I want you to do whatever it takes to maintain a constant pressure at point B in the system, and to hell with what's going on over at the compressor." And it will comply. (Boost controllers are pretty simple-minded like that. They don't question orders.) Specifically, it now does not matter what the drop across the intercooler is, at least insofar as your actual manifold pressure is concerned. As drop across the IC increases, the boost controller will cause the compressor pressure to increase accordingly. So by the time you get to 7,000 RPM and are experiencing 3 PSI of drop across the IC, the pressure at point A will be up to 15 PSI, and you'll still be getting your 12 PSI at the manifold.




And here's everything you need to make it happen:



Yup. One 1/8" NPT hose-barb fitting. About $3 at your local ACE Hardware store. Drill ye' olde hole into the pipe which leads up into your throttle body, install this fitting into it, and plumb a hose from there to your MBC. Using all-silicone tube? (***.) Well, just drill a hole in the colid-side end tank of the IC itself. Anywhere is fine so long as it's after the IC core, and before the throttle body.

You'll probably have to turn the MBC down just a tad in order to achieve the same peak boost you had before, as it's no longer having to factor in even the smallest IC drop.


Vaya con Dios, friends. May your manifold pressure be stable.
Attached Thumbnails Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.-1.gif   Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.-2.gif   Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.-3.gif   Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.-4.gif   Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.-5.gif  


Last edited by Joe Perez; 09-04-2012 at 05:18 PM. Reason: Changed images to local embed
Joe Perez is online now  
Reply
Leave a poscat 12 Leave a negcat
Old 05-18-2010, 03:40 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Bryce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
Default

*Standing Ovation*
Bryce is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:41 PM
  #3  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

BRILLIANT and funny

Needs to be stickied asap
18psi is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:46 PM
  #4  
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Splitime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
Default

Am I missing part of this or is there a missing suggestion of also just using ports on the Intake Manifold. Lots of stuff to T into or just steal entirely.
Splitime is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:47 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
miataspeed2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Connect-I-Cut
Posts: 1,404
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'm glad you explained it to everyone, alot of people don't know this. I had this issue about a year ago and it's been working flawless since then
miataspeed2005 is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:47 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
wayne_curr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 4
Default

I swear you could make literally thousands of dollars as a professional technical writer.

Very good. I knew this and still found it an entertaining read. Of course, even though I know this, i've still got my signal coming off of the compressor housing. This will change once my engine goes back in though.
wayne_curr is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:48 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
wayne_curr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Splitime
Am I missing part of this or is there a missing suggestion of also just using ports on the Intake Manifold. Lots of stuff to T into or just steal entirely.
You cant take the signal off the intake manifold because of vacuum destroying your wastegate diaphragm. Isn't this a conclusion someone came to before?
wayne_curr is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:48 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
bojanglincraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Culpeper Va
Posts: 264
Total Cats: 0
Default

Feels sticky
bojanglincraig is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:50 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
miataspeed2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Connect-I-Cut
Posts: 1,404
Total Cats: 0
Default

It has to be before TB... Oh and I got a little boost spike but at least it doesn't sag towards red line
miataspeed2005 is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:52 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 2,518
Total Cats: 30
Default

Great write up again Joe.

Originally Posted by Splitime
Am I missing part of this or is there a missing suggestion of also just using ports on the Intake Manifold. Lots of stuff to T into or just steal entirely.
https://www.miataturbo.net/showthrea...t=32479&page=2 -Post #21. Read about reference point "C".
RotorNutFD3S is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:55 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
JayL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,881
Total Cats: 2
Default

When will this be available on video?
JayL is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:55 PM
  #12  
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Splitime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
Default

Originally Posted by wayne_curr
You cant take the signal off the intake manifold because of vacuum destroying your wastegate diaphragm. Isn't this a conclusion someone came to before?
Huh? I've run many cars off the intake manifold with 0 issues
Splitime is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:59 PM
  #13  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by JayL
When will this be available on video?
In for another thermostat testing video. But with mbc's this time
18psi is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 04:00 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
j555pre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Todmorden UK
Posts: 98
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'm just reaching this point in my build, awesome, saves me a tonne of research.

Thanks alot!!
j555pre is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 04:03 PM
  #15  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,023
Total Cats: 6,591
Default

Originally Posted by wayne_curr
You cant take the signal off the intake manifold because of vacuum destroying your wastegate diaphragm. Isn't this a conclusion someone came to before?
Well, I think that may be a myth.

Or at least, a half-truth.

The real trouble with taking the boost reference from point C doesn't come into focus until we consider what happens when you are operating in boost, but at part-throttle.

So, let's say you're climbing a hill in 4th, and you're getting into the throttle enough to hold a constant speed but not accelerate. You're seeing maybe 6 PSI at the manifold. Because the boost controller is referenced to point B, the turbo is in fact probably making 12 PSI at that point. Ok, so it's making a little bit of excess heat, and our efficiency is off a few tenths, but no harm done.

But what if we had the boost controller referenced to point C? Well, the fact that you are using the throttle to modulate boost means that the manifold pressure is never actually going to reach the setpoint, however the boost controller isn't smart enough to realize this. (As I said before, they're loyal, but very simple-minded. Kind of like people from Minnesota.)

So now we're in a state where the boost controller is trying like mad to get the manifold up to 12 PSI, and it's fighting against a throttle plate that's not going to let it happen. Thus, the effective boost target (as seen from points A and B) becomes infinite!



That's right, anthropomorphic chibi-Dan. Well, maybe not infinite per-se, but the wastegate is definitely not going to open voluntarily. The turbo is just going to fight as hard as it bloody well can to achieve a target it'll never reach, making all kinds of heat in the process and sucking down your VE worse than a brain slug. Is this actually going to break anything? Probably not immediately. But you are putting a lot of undue stress on things without getting much, if anything, in return.
Joe Perez is online now  
Old 05-18-2010, 04:14 PM
  #16  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Best writeup ever
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 04:16 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
j555pre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Todmorden UK
Posts: 98
Total Cats: 0
Default

So let me see if i have this right.

1. Feed to boost gauge should be after the TB.

2. Feed to boost controller then to wastegate after IC but before TB.

3. Best location for blow off valve feed? Before or after TB?

4. Feed to MAP sensor after TB.

Thanks
j555pre is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 04:17 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TrickerZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
Posts: 850
Total Cats: 16
Default

Uh, doesn't your line go to the MBC? If your MBC is not a bleed valve, the manifold tap wouldn't cause a problem with your WG. The issue is more with your turbo spooling when you lift since it would close your WG completely and it will also run your turbo hard when not WOT. Not only do you have the IC restricting, but also the TB. You only want your boost target right before the TB for that reason.
TrickerZ is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 04:18 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TrickerZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
Posts: 850
Total Cats: 16
Default

dammit, Joe beat me
TrickerZ is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 04:30 PM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 2,518
Total Cats: 30
Default

Originally Posted by j555pre
So let me see if i have this right.

1. Feed to boost gauge should be after the TB.

2. Feed to boost controller then to wastegate after IC but before TB.

3. Best location for blow off valve feed? Before or after TB?

4. Feed to MAP sensor after TB.

Thanks
1. If that's where you want to measure boost. Would be the best place to read what's going into the engine.
2. Yes.
3. After TB and as close to the TB as possible.
4. Yes, best location being at the back of the manifold.
RotorNutFD3S is offline  


Quick Reply: Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.