DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Oil-less turbocharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2011, 07:54 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
cardriverx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
Default Oil-less turbocharger

Hey guys! So we just had our car show today, and I found something very interesting. Ryan from Moore performance came up with a WRX that he built up, and he was running an intriguing turbocharger from Comp Turbo Technology.

It is basically a normal turbo from Comp, but they use a special high tempature grease in the housing, eliminating the need for oil (still uses water cooling). Ryan said it has worked great, and it is supposed to have about a 50k mile service interval.

Has anyone herd of these before? It seems really neat, it would be nice to not worry about oil draining/smoking, plus you could mount the turbo however you wanted! Would be great for remote mount people too.

Just thought I would pass it along...


http://www.compturbo.com/spotlights/oilless





cardriverx is offline  
Old 10-23-2011, 07:59 PM
  #2  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Oh great, two less lines!!!

What a waste of time.
hustler is offline  
Old 10-23-2011, 08:00 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Bryce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
Default

Old news is old.

Attached Thumbnails Oil-less turbocharger-dscn0198.jpg  
Bryce is offline  
Old 10-23-2011, 11:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
fastivab6tg25mr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sacramento ,ca
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 160
Default

my buddy was talking about these a few months back.
fastivab6tg25mr is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 12:55 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
viperormiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
Oh great, two less lines!!!

What a waste of time.
It's for packaging reasons, mostly.


Oh, and they absolutely stomp **** out of Garrett in the performance department.
viperormiata is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 03:45 PM
  #6  
Newb
 
nuvolarossa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Italy, €urope.
Posts: 22
Total Cats: 0
Default

I can understand them in cars where space constraints limit to a low bottom mount manifold, where a scavenge pump is mandatory, but I don't see them as huge news for cars that have space for a nice top mount.

They don't need oil lines BUT they still need water lines.

I read good and bad things about them.
The few bad news were about their reliability. I really would like to hear more high mileage out of them to be convinced.

As now, as far I know (maybe I'm wrong) they don't offer the same trouble-less life as a standard turbo with correct engineered oil system.

IIRC there were some fails, now I don't remember if they were the first ones released or not.

I really would use them if they had no troubles, had some cars in past where the turbo sat too low and I had to quit the project because I never trusted scavenge pumps(until Turbowerx came ).
nuvolarossa is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:10 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
vehicular's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,855
Total Cats: 47
Default

The point of these is that you can put them ANYWHERE. You wouldnt buy one and use it on a normal manfold. You would buy one and use it on a long runner header, with the turbo hidden under the car, or some such.

Unfortunately, Comp has a serious reliability reputation problem. These turbos might be better than their more conventional stuff, but said conventional turbos are notorious for coming apart every 500 miles.
vehicular is offline  
Old 10-25-2011, 03:31 AM
  #8  
Newb
 
boosted90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 0
Default

there are some cool new turbos on the market. check out the new EFR turbos from borg-warner. they have internal gate and built in by-pass valves. there was a guy on a jetski forum i am on that put one on his built motor and they are looking pretty promising.
boosted90 is offline  
Old 10-25-2011, 10:04 AM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
samnavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: VaBch, VA
Posts: 6,451
Total Cats: 322
Default

Anything that reduces points of failure is worth the investment... especially if it was just finding the right grease that's probably some aerospace application that's been around for years. And since water cooling isn't really necessary on a street-car, I can see eliminating at least 10pts of failure/leakage in eliminating the 4 fluid lines.

Yes, a good idea for packaging, but less parts to buy and engineer even if you've got the room. No more "tapping the pan", buying sandwich plates, draining the radiator, etc...

I respectfully disagree with Hustler that discovering an easy way to eliminate oil cooling is a waste of time.
samnavy is offline  
Old 10-25-2011, 10:07 AM
  #10  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by viperormiata
Oh, and they absolutely stomp **** out of Garrett in the performance department.
The proof is in the pudding.
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-25-2011, 12:40 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
viperormiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
The proof is in the pudding.
Check them out. I get usually get a hard on from reading comparison threads/dyno charts and anything else that involves new turbo technology...foreveralone.jpg
viperormiata is offline  
Old 10-25-2011, 02:28 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Fireindc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Taos, New mexico
Posts: 6,598
Total Cats: 561
Default

Something like this is what i've been looking for, for my Buell. I've been wanting to do a turbo setup mounted under the bike where the stock muffler is, this would keep a low center of gravity, as well as the clean looks. You can see what I mean in this pic. (mines on the left).



I'm talking mounted under the bike attached right of the end of the header. It would be really easy to mount there. I would need a tiny one, gt15,17,20 etc. Then id just need to set up a water reservoir with a remote pump and hide it somewhere. The nakedness of the bike would make this hard.

Any ideas?
Attached Thumbnails Oil-less turbocharger-img_2450.jpg  
Fireindc is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 10:54 AM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
Cookiesoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Blacksburg VA
Posts: 115
Total Cats: 0
Default

they need to make it small.... so you can pop them on an ATV or bike with out worring about oiling
Cookiesoup is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 11:42 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

No oil lines would be nice for a rear mount turbo. The cooling lines may still be needed but they are easier to deal with.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FAB
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
216
03-22-2017 04:00 PM
Model192
Meet and Greet
16
09-29-2015 08:50 PM
Marcdasharq
Meet and Greet
2
09-11-2015 12:21 AM
turboLuigi
Meet and Greet
2
09-04-2015 01:29 PM
patsmx5
General Miata Chat
15
04-12-2008 12:27 AM



Quick Reply: Oil-less turbocharger



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 AM.