DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Auto Tune, a better way?

Old 09-01-2016, 12:49 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default Auto Tune, a better way?

Intrigued by recent posts claiming great success with the autotune feature (in Boost), I decided to give it another try. I started a new project using my previous one as a base. My map in the 100 kpa and lower is pretty spot on. So I wanted to let autotune help me with the boost side of the fuel map.
Two hour later, roasted brakes and half a tank of gas later, I had a **** map. Nothing useful IMO. Just wacko numbers that were unbelievable and drive like poo.
My method :
1. Find a long steep grade to increase load and decrease brake abuse.
2. Start autotune (easy) while in 3rd gear, 2000 rpm use the rake and throttle to sweep through the manifold pressures from 100 up to 250.
3. Repeat for 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500 and 5000 rpm, saving the tune after every sweep.

Results= garbage. I can get results much faster and more accurately with 20 runs and logs, making adjustment manually.

What are you guys doing different? Do I haz the dumb again?

ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 12:52 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

This method has worked fine for me.
Obviously I do back and do some smoothing and adjusting manually. Adjust cells in funny areas of the map by hand too.
Erat is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 01:07 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
acedeuce802's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 1,218
Total Cats: 175
Default

MS2 or MS3? Is your AFR signal clean?

I've never done anything special with auto tune, just let it run while I drive making sure to slowly ramp to different throttle positions, and it's yielded nothing but good results. As Dillon said, it requires some smoothing afterwards, but should be a usable map before smoothing.
acedeuce802 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 01:08 PM
  #4  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Works fine for me too, just to rough it in and get the general shape and close to target values.
Too far off and I manually help it. Real close and I start smoothing it by hand. It's good but it's still not magical, needs a lot of assistance.
18psi is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 01:11 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Afr signal is clean and believable. Maybe I was just expecting too much. I don't know. I just done belive that 15 psi boost would require less or the same fuel as 90 kpa. I have a huge block of numbers I don't believe. Not just a couple sporadic ones.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 01:20 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Do u you guys use the afr target safety at the same time? If so what was the allowable differential? I was at .2 but couldn't even get into boost area long enough. So I changed it to .5
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 01:23 PM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,645
Total Cats: 3,009
Default

Did you turn off AE? If you did it was a mistake. Autotune doesn't make changes until AE has tapered off so it doesn't interfere with the tune. But turning AE off can do weird things to the autotuning.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 01:24 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

All on.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 01:27 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

So I guess it sounds like I was doing it right, I mean it's not too complicated. Just isn't netting results. Going back to logs and manual tune process.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:25 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
 
x_25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: NorthWest NJ
Posts: 1,821
Total Cats: 141
Default

For the under 100kpa cells (still N/A....) I can bang out a useable table in an hour or so with autotune. Not perfect, but ok. Duno what is up with yours.

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Did you turn off AE? If you did it was a mistake. Autotune doesn't make changes until AE has tapered off so it doesn't interfere with the tune. But turning AE off can do weird things to the autotuning.
I was wondering if that was the case or not, since it has worked well in the non boosted cells for me with AE on.
x_25 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:25 PM
  #11  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,488
Total Cats: 4,077
Default

  1. get a job that's 1hr drive away
  2. drive to work and autotune
  3. ????
  4. go home and repeat.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:30 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
  1. get a job that's 1hr drive away
  2. drive to work and autotune
  3. ????
  4. go home and repeat.
I do this on the regular. Sooner or later I'm going to go to jail if I don't sort it out.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:31 PM
  #13  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Originally Posted by x_25
For the under 100kpa cells (still N/A....) I can bang out a useable table in an hour or so with autotune. Not perfect, but ok. Duno what is up with yours.



I was wondering if that was the case or not, since it has worked well in the non boosted cells for me with AE on.
Under 100 kpa works fine. Same thing. Got that roughed out in an hour. Dialed in perfect in a few drives. Turbo says no.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:33 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

I still have a good map, all up to 250 kpa. I was just trying the autotune for boost, just to see. Looks nothing like my known good map.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:35 PM
  #15  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,488
Total Cats: 4,077
Default

boosting is the easiest for it to tune, since the load is constant through an rpm range. do 4th gear pulls from as low of an rpm as you can.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:40 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Chooofoojoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Denver, Co.
Posts: 458
Total Cats: 40
Default

I take it for what it's worth, just another tool to utilize in the process of manual tuning. It's VE Analyze Live. It still needs help in taking it's suggested numbers and making them copacetic with the rest of the map. It's far from magic or auto-tune in my opinion. I've gotten a driveable map from VEAL, but never a great/solid map without manual smoothing and corrections.

VEAL helps make tuning a lazy affair. Just slowly increased boost and communte to work / do a canyon run and let VEAL get the map in the ballpark. In doing so I keep an eye peeled to my AFR's and made sure they weren't waaaaaay off. This gave me a decent shape of the graph and I manually went in, smoothed and tweaked a bit, did some logs to confirm that the map works properly. Allows me to more or less just drive the car normally as opposed to doing specific logged runs.
Chooofoojoo is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:56 PM
  #17  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

^^^^^this. Maybe I need to start at low boost, and then keep raising it, rather than trying to get it all at once. I don't know. I feel I haz the dumb on this. It's just wierd. I auto tuned and then manually adjusted my 0-100 kpa, and I can stay within .2 of afr target at almost zero ergo control. Like I said, I'm not dead in the water, this was just an experiment.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 04:13 PM
  #18  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

What do you have your cell change resistance set to. If you have it set to very easy it will make changes that are way too big.
aidandj is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 04:17 PM
  #19  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Another possible root cause.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 10:07 PM
  #20  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 856
Default

I agree with Brain. Don't try to run columns, run rows. I don't know why, I only know that's how I did it and it worked well
DNMakinson is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Auto Tune, a better way?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.