1.6/disco potato/mustang dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2013, 12:01 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
endura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: toronto
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 7
Default 1.6/disco potato/mustang dyno

1990/1.6 original w/100K/disco potato/ms2/460 inj/oem pump/ignition/internals/cat. and muffler/3" pipe. 9psi and 11psi.

-for reference, car was at 9psi when purchased and with the tuning as left by the previous owner it put down 165hp 150lb/tq on the same dyno.
Attached Thumbnails 1.6/disco potato/mustang dyno-scan0001.jpg  
endura is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 12:04 AM
  #2  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,022
Total Cats: 304
Default

Nice numbers?
thirdgen is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 11:41 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

seems a bit low.

Not sure the difference between mustang and dynapack but i made 30 more hp with a 2860 (potato) and 20 mopre ft lbs all over with the same boost.
3" turboback with high flow cat and magnaflow muffler.

Mine was a pro tune though.

This is my 10 and 12 psi overlay

Attached Thumbnails 1.6/disco potato/mustang dyno-overlay.jpg  
shlammed is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 11:48 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Fireindc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Taos, New mexico
Posts: 6,599
Total Cats: 561
Default

Seems good to me, but of course it depends on how the mustang dyno was configured. Mustang dynos "typically" read lower than others, but they can be configured to put out whatever numbers you want really.
Fireindc is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 11:24 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
endura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: toronto
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 7
Default

I wouldn't be surprised if I got different results at a different mustang dyno. and even more difference with a different brand of dyno. different day. etc.
for example,
Nissan GTR:

Mustang Dyno: 406 HP/6400 rpm & 414 ft-lb/3800 rpm
Dynapack: 452 HP/6350 rpm & 448 ft-lb/3865 rpm

Tested on same day and conditions.
endura is offline  
Old 06-27-2013, 04:13 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
endura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: toronto
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 7
Default

mechanical failure at track led to blown engine. replaced with jdm motor with unknown mileage. it was retuned on the dyno, just because.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Berge New Motor 11psi.pdf (34.9 KB, 253 views)
endura is offline  
Old 06-27-2013, 04:17 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
endura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: toronto
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 7
Default

for comparison, ap2 s2k's have a hard time cracking 200 whp on mustang dyno's. regardless, blown engine= bad, retune with higher/wider torque curve= good.
endura is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JasonC SBB
ECUs and Tuning
11
10-27-2015 04:56 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
10-01-2015 09:30 AM
Lincoln Logs
Dynos and timesheets
4
09-23-2015 12:26 PM
tehzack
Dynos and timesheets
10
09-21-2015 06:30 PM



Quick Reply: 1.6/disco potato/mustang dyno



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM.