JayL

iTrader: (12)

Here's the spark map. Like I was saying, very conservative.

JayL

iTrader: (12)

Really, the only change I made was to to the boost target. I have the car partially ripped apart right now and I can't hook up the battery so I can't pull the map that's in the car.

hustler

iTrader: (6)

OMFG that table is "retarded." Fire out the valves anyone?

Look at the .msq I sent you and raise those values way up. "Treycops3.msq" has each cell set at MBT with 93 octane in an 8.6:1, 1.9l and you can compare the CLT and IAT values from the log. I think you can run at least 20* advance at 15psi considering your turbine is bigger than mine.

Do you have "det cans?" They take the guess work out of tuning and minor detonation. They're required for tuning, just ask Savington who recently discovered the gospel and was healed.

JayL

iTrader: (12)

I guess I'm just being really paranoid about having an actual mechanical problem with the new motor. If the consensus is that it's all in the tune, then I'm a very happy person.

hustler

iTrader: (6)

I'm running 28* advance in some places where you're running 9*, lol.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

at least run around 15-16* at 180kPa, but like hustler said, Newbsauce's built 1.63L is running closer to 22-23* at 15-18psi.

y8s

iTrader: (8)

i dont think the spark map is the reason the car's "falling flat on its face" though. running high EGT etc, sure, but not falling flat.