went to the dyno today....
12-01-2006, 12:46 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 737
Total Cats: 0
went to the dyno today....
( Pictures to come )
I finally made it to the dyno today. I did 3 runs one at 14psi, one at 15psi and one at 16psi. It was warm ( 66*) and humid outside today since we are having unseasonably warm weather but its better than dynoing in the middle of the summer heat. Also this was on a mustang dyno and not a Dynojet so numbers may be slightly lower. Ok so here is the power I made....
13-14psi = 264.4hp 241.8tq
15-15.5psi = 283.4hp 266.9tq
16psi = 294.3hp 270tq
AFR's were never more lean than 12.5 at ANY point during these runs. I was around 11.5-12.0 up to 4k, then I had a little lean 12.3-12.5 lean spike @ 4300 ( full boost ). After 4500 AFR's dropped all the way down to 10.5 and stayed there. I was losing power due to the overwhelming richness up top. I cant wait to get a standalone so I can lean it out up top. I was running 110 octane fuel just as a precaution as well. Overall I am happy with the numbers. I am waiting on the pics to be emailed to me so they will be up shortly.
I finally made it to the dyno today. I did 3 runs one at 14psi, one at 15psi and one at 16psi. It was warm ( 66*) and humid outside today since we are having unseasonably warm weather but its better than dynoing in the middle of the summer heat. Also this was on a mustang dyno and not a Dynojet so numbers may be slightly lower. Ok so here is the power I made....
13-14psi = 264.4hp 241.8tq
15-15.5psi = 283.4hp 266.9tq
16psi = 294.3hp 270tq
AFR's were never more lean than 12.5 at ANY point during these runs. I was around 11.5-12.0 up to 4k, then I had a little lean 12.3-12.5 lean spike @ 4300 ( full boost ). After 4500 AFR's dropped all the way down to 10.5 and stayed there. I was losing power due to the overwhelming richness up top. I cant wait to get a standalone so I can lean it out up top. I was running 110 octane fuel just as a precaution as well. Overall I am happy with the numbers. I am waiting on the pics to be emailed to me so they will be up shortly.
Reply
0
0
12-01-2006, 01:36 AM
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 737
Total Cats: 0
I wouldnt call the mustang dyno "crappy" I think its a better dyno personally. Sure its numbers are a little lower. But it offers a more realistic power level, some dynojets are inflated a little I think. Yeah, I have a Bipes, AFPR setup. I just know the ins and outs of it. I can get the most out of what I have.
Reply
0
0
12-01-2006, 01:56 AM
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 737
Total Cats: 0
OK so Im waiting on an email so I can have betetr dyno charts but here are the plots for now. As you can see torque drops off in the upper rpms. I need to lean it out up top and I need a better intake manifold.
Reply
0
0
12-01-2006, 02:14 AM
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 737
Total Cats: 0
I dont think the duty % is that high since the stock ecu is still controlling the injectors the duty cycle is whatever the stock 1.6L ecu allows...not sure what it is but would guess its not past .85.
Reply
0
0
12-01-2006, 02:20 AM
#19
With what we've seen on the 1.8 injectors and now with the 330's it's obvious that the numbers from RC have a lot of safety built into them.
What is interesting is that a lot of the experts say that you can't get this kind of power with a stock ECU. Guess the bandaids work.
What is interesting is that a lot of the experts say that you can't get this kind of power with a stock ECU. Guess the bandaids work.
Reply
0
0
