ECUs and Tuning Discuss Engine Management, Tuning, & Programming

wiring wideband ground to battery terminal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2015, 07:57 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
btabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 610
Total Cats: 12
Default wiring wideband ground to battery terminal

I am in the midst of doing some rewiring on my 1990 to run a 2002 engine with MS3. My wideband ground was wired to the cylinder head in the past but it always seemed to jump around a little too much. Scott Clark recommended me to wire it to a ground block installed by the battery ground.
Has anyone done this and can you post pictures? What gauge cable and quality should I use to extend the ground to wire it close to the battery?
Thanks
btabor is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 11:52 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Schuyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
Default

Why not just do it properly and wire it to the sensor ground at the ECU?
Schuyler is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 12:12 AM
  #3  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,020
Total Cats: 6,588
Default

Originally Posted by btabor
Scott Clark recommended me to wire it to a ground block installed by the battery ground.
I don't know who Scott Clark is, but my initial impression is that he isn't an electrical engineer.

When the engine is running, the alternator is the primary source of electrical power to the car, and thus, the alternator's chassis is the primary ground for the car. Since the alternator is firmly bolted to the engine, we generally accept the engine block and head to be a surrogate "ideal ground" for electrical loads.

The battery only matters when the engine is not running. After it's started, the battery becomes a load, not a source. Running a ground wire all the way back to the battery is pretty close to the worst possible topology. This means that the current has to travel from the source, all the way back to the battery, then through the ground strap to the body, then all the way through the body to the front, then across the ground strap to the engine, and then finally to the alternator.

I mean, you could do worse, but you'd have to really try. (eg: a self-tapping screw loosely driven into an oversized hole in a piece of rusty sheet metal.)




Originally Posted by Schuyler
Why not just do it properly and wire it to the sensor ground at the ECU?
This is the best idea. For the most stable and accurate readings, the ECU and O2 sensor should share the same ground. This is why all of the OBD-II cars run all of their analog sensor grounds back into the ECU itself, whereas the earlier cars grounded them to whatever point was most convenient. What matters most for an analog sensor is not that it has the best possible ground, but that it see the same ground potential as the ECU.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 12:18 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Look for my posts on this very topic.

In my day job I live and breathe mixed signal grounding.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 12:38 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
festersays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 177
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
For the most stable and accurate readings, the ECU and O2 sensor should share the same ground. This is why all of the OBD-II cars run all of their analog sensor grounds back into the ECU itself, whereas the earlier cars grounded them to whatever point was most convenient. What matters most for an analog sensor is not that it has the best possible ground, but that it see the same ground potential as the ECU.
I just want to make sure I'm reading this correctly, for OBD2 cars you're referencing this as the ideal ground, right? The photo seems like it's small on my screen but it should show what I'm asking.



A little low on sleep, forgive me if this is a stupid thing to be confused on.
Attached Images  
festersays is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 10:52 AM
  #6  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by Schuyler
Why not just do it properly and wire it to the sensor ground at the ECU?
why would you want to screw up the sensor grounding? But wiring it to the ECU's power ground isn't a bad idea.

Originally Posted by festersays
I just want to make sure I'm reading this correctly, for OBD2 cars you're referencing this as the ideal ground, right? The photo seems like it's small on my screen but it should show what I'm asking.



A little low on sleep, forgive me if this is a stupid thing to be confused on.

the simple fact that i see of a picture of an engine bay means it's wrong.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 11:19 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
btabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 610
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I don't know who Scott Clark is, but my initial impression is that he isn't an electrical engineer.
He works for diyautotune. Tuned my car last year.

THanks for all the recommendations. I will wire the ground to the MS3 dimitris is making me.
btabor is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 11:23 AM
  #8  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by btabor
He works for diyautotune. Tuned my car last year.

THanks for all the recommendations. I will wire the ground to the MS3 dimitris is making me.
that's good. and he should be able to provide a 12v source for it too, so it can just all be wired up in one spot.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 04:33 PM
  #9  
Supporting Vendor
 
Matt Cramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,332
Total Cats: 67
Default

Originally Posted by Schuyler
Why not just do it properly and wire it to the sensor ground at the ECU?
That would work if and only if the wideband has a separate analog ground, and that is the only ground you wire to sensor return.

If the ground also runs the heater current through it, this will create more problems than it solves.
__________________
Matt Cramer
www.diyautotune.com
Matt Cramer is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 05:16 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

If there is a single ground wire for both heater and signal (bad juju BTW), then it should be connected to the power ground pin of the ECU, not to the battery - terminal, not the engine block or head, not to Hustler's left nut.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 05:33 PM
  #11  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,020
Total Cats: 6,588
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
If there is a single ground wire for both heater and signal (bad juju BTW), then it should be connected to the power ground pin of the ECU, not to the battery - terminal, not the engine block or head, not to Hustler's left nut.
Agreed. So long as proper sensor grounding practices have been observed, you should have no problem dropping a little extra current onto the ECU's primary ground, even with a single-ground sensor.

The alternative (introducing noise and variable offset into the WBO2 signal by grounding it somewhere other than the ECU) is undesirable.
Joe Perez is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
Goldwar
DIY Turbo Discussion
2
09-29-2015 09:20 AM
viriiguy
General Miata Chat
5
09-28-2015 07:39 PM
ihiryu
General Miata Chat
9
09-28-2015 10:22 AM



Quick Reply: wiring wideband ground to battery terminal



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.