Turbo + irtb's tip-in problem
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granada, Spain
Posts: 341
Total Cats: 2
Turbo + irtb's tip-in problem
Car specs:
european 1.8 NB
T25 s13 turbo
adapted fuji-racing irtb's
rx8 injectors
adaptronic 420c v10 firmware
The car runs well when steady throttle is applied but tip-in is almost impossible to tune. No matter how much or less fuel the injectors sprays, the engine reacts the same way, it bogs down and shows a lean spike. Adding more than ~8ms to off-idle and the engine dies filled up with unburnt fuel after a huge lean situation.
I'm using MAP x TPS x RPM (dual tables) tuning method with TPS-based accel enrichment
List of things I've tried, unsuccessfully:
-Move the injectors from the irtb location to the stock location on the head.
-Relocate the injectors wires as described in this thread: https://www.miataturbo.net/adaptroni...sitions-65816/
-Switch from full sequential to batch firing in pairs with divided pulses
I think it can be related to injection timming but the 420c ecu uses a fixed injection angle, so I can't change it.
european 1.8 NB
T25 s13 turbo
adapted fuji-racing irtb's
rx8 injectors
adaptronic 420c v10 firmware
The car runs well when steady throttle is applied but tip-in is almost impossible to tune. No matter how much or less fuel the injectors sprays, the engine reacts the same way, it bogs down and shows a lean spike. Adding more than ~8ms to off-idle and the engine dies filled up with unburnt fuel after a huge lean situation.
I'm using MAP x TPS x RPM (dual tables) tuning method with TPS-based accel enrichment
List of things I've tried, unsuccessfully:
-Move the injectors from the irtb location to the stock location on the head.
-Relocate the injectors wires as described in this thread: https://www.miataturbo.net/adaptroni...sitions-65816/
-Switch from full sequential to batch firing in pairs with divided pulses
I think it can be related to injection timming but the 420c ecu uses a fixed injection angle, so I can't change it.
#9
Just a noob throwing out an idea. Does the adaptronic do anything equivalant to MS EAE? that might negate the need for so much normal AE perhaps?
Also how long is the lean spike? its hard to tell from the pic if its only 0.2 or 0.3 seconds it might just be a case of thats as good as it gets with an aftermarket, i know Brain ( i think ) has said before that u will never 100% get rid of lean tip in with MS since its reacting to changes after they happen.
Scott
Also how long is the lean spike? its hard to tell from the pic if its only 0.2 or 0.3 seconds it might just be a case of thats as good as it gets with an aftermarket, i know Brain ( i think ) has said before that u will never 100% get rid of lean tip in with MS since its reacting to changes after they happen.
Scott
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granada, Spain
Posts: 341
Total Cats: 2
I've tried from 0 to big numbers and it reacts the same way. Bigger pulses only makes the AFR richer after the lean spike. The only way to make the engine rev without hesitation is running 10'xx AFR at idle with nice black clouds coming out the exhaust.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granada, Spain
Posts: 341
Total Cats: 2
Just a noob throwing out an idea. Does the adaptronic do anything equivalant to MS EAE? that might negate the need for so much normal AE perhaps?
Also how long is the lean spike? its hard to tell from the pic if its only 0.2 or 0.3 seconds it might just be a case of thats as good as it gets with an aftermarket, i know Brain ( i think ) has said before that u will never 100% get rid of lean tip in with MS since its reacting to changes after they happen.
Scott
Also how long is the lean spike? its hard to tell from the pic if its only 0.2 or 0.3 seconds it might just be a case of thats as good as it gets with an aftermarket, i know Brain ( i think ) has said before that u will never 100% get rid of lean tip in with MS since its reacting to changes after they happen.
Scott
The lean spike is almost 1 second and the car is undriveable.
#13
I'm almost positive we had these lean tip in issues when we were screwing around with the early adaptronics years ago. You already probably checked the adaptronic section, but I'd look through there again. Something about asynch pump settings and "predictive throttle" if I remember correctly.
In fact, I'm almost positive that by messing with those 2 settings I actually got mine to do EXTREMELY rich tip in, which ironically enough, was just as terrible as your lean tip in. I remember the car bogging like crazy then lurching forward.
Sorry I can't be of more help and post actual discussion threads, but I'd browse that section more if I were you.
*edit: then again, none of us had IRTB's so maybe that wouldn't help you.
In fact, I'm almost positive that by messing with those 2 settings I actually got mine to do EXTREMELY rich tip in, which ironically enough, was just as terrible as your lean tip in. I remember the car bogging like crazy then lurching forward.
Sorry I can't be of more help and post actual discussion threads, but I'd browse that section more if I were you.
*edit: then again, none of us had IRTB's so maybe that wouldn't help you.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granada, Spain
Posts: 341
Total Cats: 2
Thanks Vlad. I think your talking about the "predicted MAP" option that was introduced in the firmware when a lot of users were having problems dialing the transient throttle.
This car is a pain in the *** to tune because you need to think in 4D instead of the traditional 3D fuel and spark tables. The theory says that acceleration enrichments are not very important when tuning using a TPS x RPM method. The ecu is configured to use a primary table to determine fuel and spark values based on TPS position, and a secondary table used as a multiply factor to attend for changes in manifold pressure, this indicates that the change in fuel values is going to happen faster based on a TPS table rather than using the traditional MAP x RPM method, so once the tables are correctly tuned, the transient throttle settings become less important.
This makes me think that there is some physical problem with fuel delivery or triggering.
This car is a pain in the *** to tune because you need to think in 4D instead of the traditional 3D fuel and spark tables. The theory says that acceleration enrichments are not very important when tuning using a TPS x RPM method. The ecu is configured to use a primary table to determine fuel and spark values based on TPS position, and a secondary table used as a multiply factor to attend for changes in manifold pressure, this indicates that the change in fuel values is going to happen faster based on a TPS table rather than using the traditional MAP x RPM method, so once the tables are correctly tuned, the transient throttle settings become less important.
This makes me think that there is some physical problem with fuel delivery or triggering.
#15
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Warrington/Birmingham
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
It's not anything to do with this is it?
https://www.miataturbo.net/adaptroni...sitions-65816/
Also tip in is effected by the VE table, look at the cells you hit when you stab the throttle and try playing with those.
https://www.miataturbo.net/adaptroni...sitions-65816/
Also tip in is effected by the VE table, look at the cells you hit when you stab the throttle and try playing with those.
#16
With just your fueling scheme you should be to about 80% of the fuel you need on tip in with no stomp comp, at least for the rpms where you cant build boost, thats the nature of tps based fueling. I bet you need a **** of a lot less fuel at that RPM level of tip in, and its showing lean on the wideband because you're actually making it misfire with all that fuel.
Also, did you change your injection angle? The injectors are further from the head than stock so you need to have the injectors inject sooner.
Also, did you change your injection angle? The injectors are further from the head than stock so you need to have the injectors inject sooner.
#17
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Warrington/Birmingham
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
With just your fueling scheme you should be to about 80% of the fuel you need on tip in with no stomp comp, at least for the rpms where you cant build boost, thats the nature of tps based fueling. I bet you need a **** of a lot less fuel at that RPM level of tip in, and its showing lean on the wideband because you're actually making it misfire with all that fuel.
Also, did you change your injection angle? The injectors are further from the head than stock so you need to have the injectors inject sooner.
Also, did you change your injection angle? The injectors are further from the head than stock so you need to have the injectors inject sooner.
He tried from zero fuel to lots.
You can't adjust the injection angle on his ECU.
#20
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
no way, my tip-in enrichments go fat as what. and it shows up as so...you'd have to go 100%dc for something like you're saying to happen.
so the adaptronic might not be great at tps enrichments, but at least the adaptronic can do tip-in retard.