ECUs and Tuning Discuss Engine Management, Tuning, & Programming

Replaced NB O2 sensor with WBO2, shop claims WBO2 caused detonation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2009, 03:35 PM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
bompus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default Replaced NB O2 sensor with WBO2, shop claims WBO2 caused detonation?

Yeah.. this is a fun one.. Working on a 99 Miata for my friend, has a turbo on it.

Basically, he had his engine redone by this shop with forged pistons, rods, lowered compression, etc to beef it up. The first thing I noticed when he got it back was that they snipped the wire leading to his AFR gauge inside the car (odd.. I thought.. why would they do that). So I hooked up a WB02 sensor and a wideband gauge, sending the 0-1v signal to the stock ECU. As I had thought, the stock ECU could not provide enough fuel to the engine even at 3psi boost, as it would go lean enough to keep the engine from revving at that point. Only did that maybe 2-3 times, not even getting on the gas hard, just to test the AFR's on the new engine.

Turns out his engine had some internal damage (keep in mind, this is less than stock horsepower with the lowered compression, and with forged rods and forged pistons). They claimed it was his rods that needed replacing, but would not say why, and they said his pistons were fine. They blamed the entire thing on "detonation due to changing the oxygen sensor from NB to WB" and it was "making the stock computer not give enough fuel", which is cannot give in either case, since he has stock injectors, stock fuel, stock ECU.

Now they are trying to charge even more $ for valves, etc, basically saying the entire engine was messed up.. and all because of what?? "the oxygen sensor did it".

Let me know your thoughts. If anything, all I can think of is the ECU was getting too lean of a signal (due to the faster response of the WB), and was trying to give it more fuel, and it could not. However, I thought about it more and realized that the stock ECU's fuel mixture is probably controlled by air temp/water temp/MAF readings to provide the fuel, and may not even use the stock O2 sensor to adjust fuel at all, and at least not in that much that would cause that kind of damage.

Let me know what you think.
bompus is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 03:45 PM
  #2  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
bompus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

Update - now the shop says the heads need to be redone as the bearings failed and they can spin the cam inside the head freely - again with no explanation besides "detonation". They now said the rods are not damaged, pistons are not damaged, but they need to replace the rods anyways because of the bearings inside the head.

I'd love to hear your replies to this one and what you think of the shop and if what they say is even possible. We did ask to have the old parts back that they were going to replace and they were pretty reluctant to do that but said they would.
bompus is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 04:06 PM
  #3  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
crashnscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
Default

Bring it to another shop.... There aren't even bearings on the cams....

And please post the shops name so that nobody goes to them again.

Edit: and why doesn't he have any engine management?
crashnscar is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 05:15 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Alta_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 228
Total Cats: 7
Default

To put it bluntly, "O2 sensor is king" when it comes to fuel. If there is no O2 sensor signal, the ECM is going to think the engine is running at about .45v, or about stoich. Under power the ecm is going to see this as lean, as it is programed to want to see a richer mixture under load, therefor it will be adding fuel.

Lean and detonation will not harm cam bearings, or saddles. My bet is they sandblasted the head, and did not get all the sand out, if there is indeed a cam bearing problem. If the valves are out, (or just the followers) the cam had dam well better spin free, or it will eat the cam in a hurry! If it spins free with the valves and followers still in place, the valves are all bent and staying open, = timing belt was off, or again the sand thing!

Was it running when it went to them?

I'm with the above comment, FIND A REAL SHOP TO DEAL WITH!

Ron
Alta_Racer is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 05:20 PM
  #5  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
And please post the shops name so that nobody goes to them again.
Braineack is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 05:28 PM
  #6  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

get a lawyer. No, seriously.
hustler is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 07:03 PM
  #7  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
bompus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
Edit: and why doesn't he have any engine management?
The engine started knocking the night before we would have been installing the new injectors and microtech ecu on the car. The car had previously been taken to someone who did not know what they were doing with fuel injection, engines, and boosting in general and it required a complete engine rebuild before I could even touch it with the new injectors + computer.
bompus is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 07:09 PM
  #8  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
bompus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Alta_Racer
To put it bluntly, "O2 sensor is king" when it comes to fuel. If there is no O2 sensor signal, the ECM is going to think the engine is running at about .45v, or about stoich. Under power the ecm is going to see this as lean, as it is programed to want to see a richer mixture under load, therefor it will be adding fuel.
So are you agreeing with me when I say that even if there was lack of an O2 signal or receiving too lean of an O2 signal would make the stock ECU give it MORE fuel instead of leaning it out, as the shop is saying? It sounded like they were smoking something from the beginning but I needed some backup to my thoughts.
bompus is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 07:11 PM
  #9  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
bompus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
And please post the shops name so that nobody goes to them again.
B & M Automotive Specialties Inc
Tucson, AZ

I'm convinced there is not a shop in Tucson that has any clue what they are doing.. Kind of worries me since I am sure they've destroyed other cars as well.
bompus is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 08:29 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Alta_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 228
Total Cats: 7
Default

Originally Posted by bompus
So are you agreeing with me when I say that even if there was lack of an O2 signal or receiving too lean of an O2 signal would make the stock ECU give it MORE fuel instead of leaning it out, as the shop is saying? It sounded like they were smoking something from the beginning but I needed some backup to my thoughts.
Yes
Alta_Racer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elesjuan
Build Threads
9
11-14-2018 12:18 PM
ThunderFox
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
2
09-10-2015 03:19 PM
AlwaysBroken
Engine Performance
5
09-06-2015 12:53 AM
bripab007
General Miata Chat
9
08-17-2007 09:35 AM
airbrush1
DIY Turbo Discussion
7
04-26-2007 08:35 PM



Quick Reply: Replaced NB O2 sensor with WBO2, shop claims WBO2 caused detonation?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.