Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

[carnage] Savington throws a rod, hilarity ensues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2009, 05:56 PM
  #21  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
\The goal is to source a 1.8, get the turbo setup swapped over

that's what i should have done, with a new begi manifold everything else would have pretty much been a direct swap.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 07:07 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
l_bader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Alamo City, Tejas
Posts: 771
Total Cats: 1
Default

Sav -

Sorry to hear about the loss.

Have already sourced a replacement block or are you hoping all the damage is internal and reusing the current block?

Like Hustler, I built the motor and sized the turbo to exceed my power requirements. As long as I don't get stupid with the tune or have cooling issues, it should hold together for whatever abuse I put it through.

As soon as the budget allows, I'll start tracking the car and see how well the theory holds up...

- L
l_bader is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:23 PM
  #23  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Epic carnage update:

Pretty cut and dry case of number 4 rod failure. Popped the rod, snapped it into 3 clean pieces, punched a nice neat hole in the block. The piston came up to the head, just barely tapped it (nearly no damage to the head), but it did blow the head gasket when it came up, which quickly joined the oil and coolant passages and spun all the rod and main bearings in short order.

These motors are ******* TANKS, though. I drove this motor 1 mile at 55mph with 3 rods intact. It ran, albeit roughly, until I shut it down myself. It even kept oil pressure until the end.

On the way out:
Name:  DSCN1271.jpg
Views: 453
Size:  64.8 KB

Name:  DSCN1274.jpg
Views: 297
Size:  64.0 KB

Name:  DSCN1276.jpg
Views: 316
Size:  74.4 KB

"uhh, thats not good."

Name:  DSCN1270.jpg
Views: 207
Size:  55.5 KB

Number 4 head:
Name:  DSCN1279.jpg
Views: 305
Size:  67.9 KB

There's the hole:


The rest of the rod:
Name:  DSCN1289.jpg
Views: 301
Size:  25.7 KB

Big end:
Name:  DSCN1290.jpg
Views: 270
Size:  54.6 KB

Small end:
Name:  DSCN1291.jpg
Views: 304
Size:  61.5 KB

4, 3, 2, 1. The rest of the rods actually look straight.
Name:  DSCN1292.jpg
Views: 293
Size:  70.8 KB

Cylinder 1
Name:  DSCN1282.jpg
Views: 323
Size:  51.1 KB

Cylinder 2
Name:  DSCN1281.jpg
Views: 265
Size:  55.5 KB

Cylinder 3
Name:  DSCN1280.jpg
Views: 319
Size:  62.7 KB

I think the head is salvageable, provided the cam bearing caps are good (doubt it). The bottom end is a throwaway.

Last edited by Savington; 03-03-2009 at 01:01 AM.
Savington is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:32 PM
  #24  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Epic carnage update:

Pretty cut and dry case of number 4 rod failure. Popped the rod, snapped it into 3 clean pieces, punched a nice neat hole in the block.
That sounds familiar... Is there another hole under the starter?
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:40 PM
  #25  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

So whats the plan Sav?
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:44 PM
  #26  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
crashnscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
That sounds familiar... Is there another hole under the starter?
That hole was under the starter.... the only one.
crashnscar is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:45 PM
  #27  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
So whats the plan Sav?
I don't want to rush a build. The plan is to source another stock longblock and just do a straight swap, keep the boost around 12-13psi, and then move my built motor timetable way up.
Savington is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:55 PM
  #28  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
thesnowboarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Incline Village, NV
Posts: 2,034
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
I don't want to rush a build. The plan is to source another stock longblock and just do a straight swap, keep the boost around 12-13psi, and then move my built motor timetable way up.
eBay Motors: 99 miata engine motor , 96k miles, NB to NA (item 130290719915 end time Mar-05-09 14:35:33 PST)

That would source your 99 head

Although i cannot take credit for it as Mark linked me to this.
thesnowboarder is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:05 PM
  #29  
Newb
 
mk128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Total Cats: 0
Default

Nick, he already knows about it
mk128 is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:10 PM
  #30  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Purchased.

This thread is now about what I need to purchase to get the '99 motor swapped into my '94 chassis. I will keep my '94 alternator, purchase a longer oil feed line, and use my COP setup, but what am I missing?
Savington is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:10 PM
  #31  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
crashnscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
Default

And may or may not have already purchased it....

Edit: Crap, too late.

Anyways, what about controlling the VCIS?

Edit2: Just found: http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread...=311587&page=1
crashnscar is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:11 PM
  #32  
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 2,518
Total Cats: 30
Default

Good time for that coolant reroute.

Keep the sensors and throttle body from your '94. Maybe not the dummy oil pressure sender, but the rest of them. The rear temp sensor is different between the two.
RotorNutFD3S is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:12 PM
  #33  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

carnage indeed
18psi is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:12 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
firedog25's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 917
Total Cats: -8
Default

Name:  DSCN1270.jpg
Views: 309
Size:  55.5 KB

Looks like chocolate milk!

So, what you're saying is the rods are the weak point?
firedog25 is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:13 PM
  #35  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

The 99 i just bought is from an automatic car. Any complications arising from that?
Savington is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:13 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
jsisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas Panhandle
Posts: 211
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Epic carnage update:
mmm... Chocolate Milk!

EDIT: haha firedog beat me to it.
jsisco is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:16 PM
  #37  
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 2,518
Total Cats: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
The 99 i just bought is from an automatic car. Any complications arising from that?
You may already know this, but thrust bearing failure was prevalent in some of those motors, but less likely on the auto cars since the thrust bearing was technically unused. There's a vin range posted somewhere on m.net.
RotorNutFD3S is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:18 PM
  #38  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Thrust bearing shows up within 40k miles or so. This one has 96k. Good idea, though, thanks.
Savington is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:31 PM
  #39  
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 2,518
Total Cats: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Thrust bearing shows up within 40k miles or so. This one has 96k. Good idea, though, thanks.
IIRC, that's mainly applicable to the manual cars. In any case, here's the Mazda TSB, worth checking out just to make double sure. That would sour a mood real quick.
http://www.miata.net/garage/tsb/sb00-01-014r-808r2.pdf
RotorNutFD3S is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:49 PM
  #40  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

****. It's within the VIN range, but it was an auto motor and only a few of the cars in the range were affected. I'll check the endplay when I throw it in, but I don't think it will be an issue that needs immediate involvement.
Savington is offline  


Quick Reply: [carnage] Savington throws a rod, hilarity ensues



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM.