Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

3d printed intake for N/A NA miatas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2016, 11:00 AM
  #301  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
dleavitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 757
Total Cats: 223
Default

You guys should get yourself on the list for the Carbon Fiber versions he is working on.
dleavitt is offline  
Old 01-10-2016, 11:09 AM
  #302  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

This is the problem with sharing a design and not having control over the quality of the printing. Also, it turns out that most consumer grade 3d printers suck at large hollow structures made from ABS.

Ideally you want to find someone with a good quality printer and a heated build chamber setup.

I can send you the info for the guy I use to print my plugs, but he doesn't do assembly or acetone vapor bath. I do that part myself. Acetone vapor baths are not super difficult but you will need to buy a few things to do it. There is some info online, just don't do it inside and don't use an open flame for your heat source. Also, if you are unsure, have a plan to deal with a solvent fire.
asmasm is offline  
Old 01-10-2016, 12:50 PM
  #303  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
btabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 610
Total Cats: 12
Default

Sounds good, I found a local guy here in Indy who is an engineer and went to Purdue. He has a Makergear m2 and wants to meet me at a brewery to discuss the plans. Sounds good to me! I'll let you know how it comes out.
btabor is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 01:29 PM
  #304  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
btabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 610
Total Cats: 12
Default

Do you have the cad drawings for the filter heatshield? Does anyone know if the rc-9310 will clear the ac rad?
btabor is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 01:48 PM
  #305  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

FWIW the rc-9310 is used for the 3d printed kits but not the carbon version (the OD of the part is much smaller with the carbon and uses 2.5" filters and elbows).

No idea what will or won't clear the AC since I don't have it on my car. I think the rc 9310 is a pretty tight squeeze.

I abandoned the heatshield. I made a crude one and tested it, there was not a measurable difference in IAT.
asmasm is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 02:23 PM
  #306  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
btabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 610
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by asmasm
FWIW the rc-9310 is used for the 3d printed kits but not the carbon version (the OD of the part is much smaller with the carbon and uses 2.5" filters and elbows).

No idea what will or won't clear the AC since I don't have it on my car. I think the rc 9310 is a pretty tight squeeze.

I abandoned the heatshield. I made a crude one and tested it, there was not a measurable difference in IAT.
Sounds good. I think I'll wait until the 3d part comes back and measure what filter I can fit in there. I may position the 3d part on the hood latch area since I have aero latches and no hood latch I'll just cut a hole on my garage star panel. My car doesn't have the round whole yours has.
I'll post a picture and silicone part numbers when im done.
btabor is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 02:25 PM
  #307  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

if oyu want to mock up the filter location, you can line it up under the radiator support hole.
asmasm is offline  
Old 01-25-2016, 10:08 AM
  #308  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

The design I have been working with was built around the original 3mm plastic wall thickness. Moving to 1mm carbon walls there is a lot of clearance, which is good, but the design is less optimal than it could be. Also, my labor on these is out of control. The process currently looks like this:

Lay up two halves under vacuum (this is the easy part)
->Oven cure for 12 hours
Trim flanges by hand
Place halves back into mold and tack corners with epoxy
->Oven cure for 6-8 hours
Fill gap with hysol 1c
-> Oven cure for 6 hours
Sand joint smooth to about 200 grit
Laminate strips of carbon over joint and vac bag
-> Oven cure for 12 hours
Hand sand and polish final part

There is a ton of hand trimming and sanding and parts have to wait on 4 epoxy cure cycles.

On the new redesign I have used up the available space better- The flat section is thicker and less wide. I also modeled it with surfaces so it can go into cad software easily. The plan is to move the process over to some machined aluminum or fiberglass molds and then bladder mold biaxial sleeves in one shot. No joining, minimal trimming, one epoxy cure cycle.




Compared to the last version:
Name:  hFFG7oZ.png
Views: 222
Size:  160.8 KB



Another small detail. I also adjusted this design to be a more viable option for over the radiator intercooler piping. I would probably throw an extra layer of carbon into those and I would want to use a resin with a TG closer to 250F. It should be doable at only a small cost difference (maybe 10%?)
Attached Thumbnails 3d printed intake for N/A NA miatas-80-yfo2jqf_d7170a4b24acaf3edf953d4fff6d1b5062d7fb4c.png  

Last edited by Joe Perez; 02-03-2016 at 06:54 PM. Reason: Put the comparison image inline
asmasm is offline  
Old 02-03-2016, 06:52 PM
  #309  
Newb
 
cravenju's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 20
Total Cats: 4
Default

Working link to .stl file? A local group in Ohio wants me to run a few prototypes at our University Lab that I currently work in. We have a dimension 1200 and Uprint(both ABS with heated chambers), a projet and a connex (polyjet), a smaller abs printer, a nylon printer with carbon, kevlar, and fiberglass inlay, and finally, an SLS printer.

Thanks!

-Josh
cravenju is offline  
Old 02-03-2016, 07:27 PM
  #310  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
btabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 610
Total Cats: 12
Default

It's on the thread. Look for it, he has several updates, find the last one and the link works
Originally Posted by cravenju
Working link to .stl file? A local group in Ohio wants me to run a few prototypes at our University Lab that I currently work in. We have a dimension 1200 and Uprint(both ABS with heated chambers), a projet and a connex (polyjet), a smaller abs printer, a nylon printer with carbon, kevlar, and fiberglass inlay, and finally, an SLS printer.

Thanks!

-Josh
btabor is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 05:46 PM
  #311  
Newb
 
cravenju's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 20
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by btabor
It's on the thread. Look for it, he has several updates, find the last one and the link works
Well, evidently, I cannot find his thingiverse model (404). Also, the .rar file on his site is broken. So, who has either an .stl or even better a .sldprt for it?
cravenju is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 09:17 PM
  #312  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

I'll re-upload the rar. It shouldn't be broken.
asmasm is offline  
Old 02-05-2016, 06:18 PM
  #313  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
btabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 610
Total Cats: 12
Default

I just got my 3d intake and I am about to install it. However, I dont have that round hole in my car. I bought a 3" hole saw, the one on the passenger side is 2.75". Should I return it and get a 2.75" hole saw or will the extra room help the intake move with engine movement and not crack?
btabor is offline  
Old 02-05-2016, 06:20 PM
  #314  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

The stock hole is oval- I would go with a 3" hole if it is going to be round.
asmasm is offline  
Old 02-10-2016, 11:47 PM
  #315  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
cyotani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Azusa, CA
Posts: 1,407
Total Cats: 116
Default

I finally got around to running the CFD. The new tube is much improved over the old tube. I compared it to a traditional 90 of the same diameter tube (2.5") since I was curious. This new tube even outflows that!

The CFM numbers speak for itself and give a good summary of the new design which flow 12% better for a set 0.25 PSI pressure drop.

NOTE: RUN AT 0.25 PSI! Not 2.5 PSI (I will edit this pics when I get home).





The best plot to see the differences between the tubes is the velcoity plot. All of the tubes show higher velocity around the bend. But the new design does the best job of keep the velocity consistent throughout the tube, especially around the bend. It's a major improvement over the old design.






Here are the pressure and flow tragector plots just for the hell of it.










Attached Thumbnails 3d printed intake for N/A NA miatas-80-results_00c646b6db315f1d16ac0a569ffdcdd465508d37.png   3d printed intake for N/A NA miatas-80-velocity_cut_plots_33f52ff8367fd22f09664bb93ca9953987637edc.png   3d printed intake for N/A NA miatas-80-pressure_cut_plots_2a877c60fe4e8d6be6d9bb8ada161db4a69284b9.png   3d printed intake for N/A NA miatas-80-flow_trajectory_8791ceb1ab75f96cb93bb3e9471b9b6ff1e89611.png   3d printed intake for N/A NA miatas-80-summary_458b10600d3a31feb26fddde583f5c3aeb7635bb.png  


Last edited by cyotani; 02-11-2016 at 10:21 AM.
cyotani is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 12:10 AM
  #316  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

I like pictures.
triple88a is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 12:21 AM
  #317  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,451
Total Cats: 479
Default

Originally Posted by cyotani

OK guys, I think you might need to call this the "Cobra CAI"
cordycord is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 12:36 AM
  #318  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

Indeed, it does sound better than the 3d printed intake for N/A
triple88a is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 07:52 AM
  #319  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

Awesome results. I guess the clean sheet design was worth it. A naturally aspirated miata engine is never going to flow close to 350 CFM. An online calculator says a engine with 2000cc displacement at 8500rpm and VE of 110 would be consuming 240 cfm.

Yeah, I probably need a name for it. I was thinking just Durham Composite intake.

Also, everyone should be giving cyotani props for doing CFD for me.

Last edited by asmasm; 02-11-2016 at 08:40 AM.
asmasm is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 08:51 AM
  #320  
Newb
 
creon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
Total Cats: 0
Default

I saw yesterday on discovery dream cars
and I immediately thought to this topic
from 13 minutes
maybe some inspiration for you

creon is offline  


Quick Reply: 3d printed intake for N/A NA miatas



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM.