Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Compression for an early BP block w/99 head

Old 03-02-2011, 03:31 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
astroboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: oahu
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
Default Compression for an early BP block w/99 head

I did the math using the 49cc combustion chamber measurement, and all the stock 94 measurements that I found (rods, crank, compressed hg ect) and came up with stock compression but then there was a large sub discussion in wes65's thread about the combo of an early BP (94/95) bottom end coupled with a 99-00 head = lower compression engine than one would expect. Can anybody weigh in on this?

Here's the sub discussion:

Originally Posted by hustler
It's even lower if he's on an early 1.8 bottom end and a 99 head.
Originally Posted by wes65
I am running a 96 bottom end and 99 head, does that mean my compression is lower than 9:1?
Originally Posted by hustler
John and I put a few 99-heads on early 1.8 bottom ends and they never seem to make more power aside form a slight increase in mid-range. I'm not sure if the cams mount higher, altering the cam timing (VW issue) or if the deck is higher but something strange is going on. The next time we have the two lying around maybe he and I can measure.
Originally Posted by MartinezA92
Does anyone have any more insight on this? It would explain a lot of things. I'm assuming its the difference in cam profile but I never got any better than 165 psi on a compression test (all 4), 94 block/99 head, 9:1 pistons. Also, cylinder leakage was 1-2%. No complaints as far as power (other than the fact that I'm N/A), but I found it kind of odd.
astroboy is offline  
Old 03-03-2011, 07:35 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mazpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Trailer County
Posts: 531
Total Cats: -18
Default

Ok!
mazpr is offline  
Old 03-03-2011, 10:48 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
inferno94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ON
Posts: 521
Total Cats: 2
Default

I'm just assuming the miata bp's are the same but the earlier bp's in fwd applications were 8.8:1 CR when they were labeled as 9:1 this was corrected to a true 9:1 for 96+ bp's.

//////SIDE NOTE:
I can't remember for sure if the valve relief cuts line up (iirc they do) but a sohc b8 short block with a bp head gives an 8.6:1 CR. The sohc crank is substantially lighter though not forged.
inferno94 is offline  
Old 03-04-2011, 12:56 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
MartinezA92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 1,784
Total Cats: 42
Default

I'm interested in the total CC's of the combustion chamber in a 94-97 head compared to a 99 head. I should have done this when I had both heads on a bench

Also, if anyone has cam specs for both, that might explain a lot. I do remember reading long ago that the 99 head was more "aggressive".
MartinezA92 is offline  
Old 03-04-2011, 07:24 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
astroboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: oahu
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
Default

Originally Posted by MartinezA92
I'm interested in the total CC's of the combustion chamber in a 94-97 head compared to a 99 head. I should have done this when I had both heads on a bench

Also, if anyone has cam specs for both, that might explain a lot. I do remember reading long ago that the 99 head was more "aggressive".
From what I read the 94-97 and the 99-00 heads have the same 49cc combustion chamber. When I get my 99 head back I WILL be verifying it. Here is a link to solomiata's cam page:

http://www.solomiata.com/cams.html
astroboy is offline  
Old 03-04-2011, 09:24 AM
  #6  
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,666
Total Cats: 336
Default

Originally Posted by astroboy
From what I read the 94-97 and the 99-00 heads have the same 49cc combustion chamber. When I get my 99 head back I WILL be verifying it. Here is a link to solomiata's cam page:

http://www.solomiata.com/cams.html
While they might have the same size combustion chamber, that chamber is formed completely different. The top shape of the '99 piston enters further into the head than does the 94-97 piston, which only comes to the top of the bore. This leaves a much larger combustion chamber area, which in turn drops the compression quite a bit.

It would be nice to know what the effective compression ratio is by combining the older bottom end with the '99 head.
olderguy is offline  
Old 03-04-2011, 11:18 AM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
leatherface24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pembroke Pines
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
Default

Hmmmmm this has me wondering if this maybe part of the reason that my 94 bottom end with 140k miles on it and my MSM head is taking 25psi without blowing up
leatherface24 is offline  
Old 03-04-2011, 04:27 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
MartinezA92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 1,784
Total Cats: 42
Default

Originally Posted by olderguy

It would be nice to know what the effective compression ratio is by combining the older bottom end with the '99 head.
Definitely this. 165 psi compression with 1-2% cylinder leakage must mean its quite a drop.
MartinezA92 is offline  
Old 03-04-2011, 06:51 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
astroboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: oahu
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
Default

Originally Posted by olderguy
While they might have the same size combustion chamber, that chamber is formed completely different. The top shape of the '99 piston enters further into the head than does the 94-97 piston, which only comes to the top of the bore. This leaves a much larger combustion chamber area, which in turn drops the compression quite a bit.

It would be nice to know what the effective compression ratio is by combining the older bottom end with the '99 head.
When I get my 99 head back I will be measuring the combustion chamber and taking lots of measurements. I can even do some side by side shots to try to get to the bottom of this caper.
astroboy is offline  
Old 03-05-2011, 06:16 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
Default

^ I would greatly appreciate it. Looking forward to the results.
pdexta is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
Corky Bell
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
18
11-22-2016 09:01 PM
shooterschmidty
Engine Performance
8
09-30-2015 10:28 PM
zephyrusaurai
Meet and Greet
2
09-28-2015 10:59 PM
btabor
ECUs and Tuning
10
09-28-2015 05:33 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Compression for an early BP block w/99 head



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.