Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

To VVT or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2010, 10:16 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
longuyen88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 332
Total Cats: 0
Default To VVT or not?

I currently have a perfectly smooth running 94R with 130k miles. My power goals are 200-250hp from a BEGI shanghai setup. Engine management will be a DIYPNP with 460cc injectors. This will be my first turbo.

I also have a VVT engine with 35k miles.

1) Is it worth it to swap in the VVT engine when my 1.8 can easily handle my goals?

2) If I decide to swap in the VVT, will a 94-95 shanghai kit still work on my car? Would I need a different DP/turbo manifold?

Thanks in advance.
longuyen88 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 11:00 AM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
flier129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
Default

You'll want something to control VVT or just have it set to full retard. You'll still see the higher rpm gains but lose mid-range with VVT set to full retard.

I believe the new MSIII will be able to control VVT, but don't hold me to it, heh.
But the ones that will are : AEM, Adaptronic(?), Haltech, Hydra, Xede, and thats all I know of lol.
flier129 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 11:20 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

If you have a means to control it you would be stupid not to utilize it.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 11:46 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
longuyen88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 332
Total Cats: 0
Default

Since I already have a DIYPNP, I am looking forward to the DIY VVT control unit. I heard that even at full retard, the VVT engine is still faster than my 94 1.8 because of the increased compression, better flowing head, and the full retard is actually 12.5 degrees so that's actually more base timing than my current engine anyways.

But the dilemma is that both will be reliable at 200 whp. The VVT would be more complex for me to install since I am a turbo noob. Should I swap the engine just to make about the same HP?
longuyen88 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 11:53 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
flier129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
Default

They say 94-95 blocks are stronger. When I say they I mean random threads on m.net.

But FWIW the 94-95 blocks have the pre-tapped hole for oil feed in a very convenient place, on the exhaust side near where the heater hoses are.
flier129 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 12:09 PM
  #6  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

not worth it
y8s is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 12:10 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by longuyen88
But the dilemma is that both will be reliable at 200 whp. The VVT would be more complex for me to install since I am a turbo noob. Should I swap the engine just to make about the same HP?
Why not put the 01 head on the 94 block?

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 12:14 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Doppelgänger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,850
Total Cats: 71
Default

From a cost/simplistic approach, you'll make your goals on the engine you have in there now. VVT won't hurt you, but to properly control it is going to be the key factor. Yes, the 01+ block has 10:1 compression which helps with off-boost power and throttle response and you may make a small gain by swapping in the 01+ block. Or you could throw the whole VVT engine in, forget about controlling the VVT for now, make a good base tune and hold out for the proper ECU to run the VVT. Remember that your current harness has no provision for the VVT solenoid and you'll have to add that yourself if you get a VVT enabled ECU.

If I were you and wanted to be impatient, I'd just skip the 01+ engine and boost what you have.
Doppelgänger is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 12:15 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
JayL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,881
Total Cats: 2
Default

Your car currently runs fine, just leave it alone and put the turbo setup on it.
JayL is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 12:15 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
buffon01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
Default

Originally Posted by flier129
But FWIW the 94-95 blocks have the pre-tapped hole for oil feed in a very convenient place, on the exhaust side near where the heater hoses are.
Didnt that stop with the 94 models??
buffon01 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 02:02 PM
  #11  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

You don't need it, but it would be a wicked street setup (10:1 + 2554R). Not a ton of torque, but all of it everywhere.
Savington is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 02:11 PM
  #12  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

The VVT motor has the potential to run stronger than the non-VVT motor, if you want to deal with the extra cost/hassle of dealing with it.

VVT control *is* coming...
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 02:58 PM
  #13  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
You don't need it, but it would be a wicked street setup (10:1 + 2554R). Not a ton of torque, but all of it everywhere.
believe me I've pondered this. if I make full boost at 3700 with the big mother of a turbo and VVT optimized... what kind of crazy low end would I have with a 2554....

does a 2554 CHRA fit in a GT2876 hotside housing?
y8s is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 03:05 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

wtfs? im sure the chras are identical. Its only the compressor, turbine, and housings that are completely different.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 03:44 PM
  #15  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

you can't replace the wheels on the GT28XX turbos. you buy the CHRA.
y8s is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 04:20 PM
  #16  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
flier129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
Default

Originally Posted by buffon01
Didnt that stop with the 94 models??
Oh your right, stopped in 94.



Originally Posted by Savington
You don't need it, but it would be a wicked street setup (10:1 + 2554R). Not a ton of torque, but all of it everywhere.
This sounds fun, I've got an extra 01 motor atm that I could use with my 99-00 head. All I need is the hotside parts! 230ft-lbs on a wide range of rpms would be pleasing

Where is the oil feed location on 01 blocks, same as a 95-97 block? Beside the oil filter?
flier129 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 05:55 PM
  #17  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Putting on the 99-00 head would completely remove the added effect of VVT....you would no longer have a broad tq curve.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 02-25-2010, 08:42 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
longuyen88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 332
Total Cats: 0
Default

Ok so it seems like the consensus is to turbo my stock engine.

Let's say I decide to go VVT next year, would the manifold/turbo/downpipe still fit on the VVT engine? Keep in mind I will be running a shanghai-S
longuyen88 is offline  
Old 02-25-2010, 11:08 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
The Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lakewood (Green Mountain) CO.
Posts: 250
Total Cats: -63
Default

I don't know dude, I'm pro VVT...

https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/t43108/
The Driver is offline  
Old 02-25-2010, 11:46 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
kcbhiw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 116
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by longuyen88

Let's say I decide to go VVT next year, would the manifold/turbo/downpipe still fit on the VVT engine? Keep in mind I will be running a shanghai-S
Everything on the exhaust side of the head is interchangeable between all of the 1.8L engines.
kcbhiw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
01-03-2016 07:18 PM
konmo
MEGAsquirt
22
11-05-2015 02:32 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
7
09-24-2015 03:50 PM
curly
MEGAsquirt
11
09-22-2015 11:54 AM



Quick Reply: To VVT or not?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 PM.