Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Build: VVT and JRSC in 93 NA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2013, 03:34 AM
  #41  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,977
Total Cats: 355
Default

There are two issues here:

1) Fueling
2) Timing

Fueling: The VVT engine needs more fuel across the board than the 1.6. At some RPM/Load areas, it will require significantly more (ie near the redline), in some areas less than that. With a stock 1.6 ECU and a pressure regulator, you won't be able to make the fueling right. You will be very rich in some areas and very lean in others. And since something tells me that you won't even install a wideband, you won't even know, but you will be happy in your ignorance.

Timing: The stock 1.6 ECU commands more timing than the stock 1.8 w/VVT ECU. Add the supercharger (which significantly raises the IAT) and the boost it provides, and you now have a recipe for certain detonation. You need to be able to pull timing somehow, and there's no easy/cheap way to do it with a VVT engine.
Reverant is offline  
Old 04-07-2013, 08:46 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
Default

Wonder if blow-through carbs wouldn't be easier and safer...
Chop the FW a bit and add a distro as well.

Those electronics are scary...
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 04-07-2013, 09:04 AM
  #43  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
miata2fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dover, FL
Posts: 3,143
Total Cats: 174
Default

Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
Wonder if blow-through carbs wouldn't be easier and safer...

Those electronics are scary...
The dying art is almost dead.
miata2fast is offline  
Old 04-07-2013, 09:33 AM
  #44  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by pakron1122
Anyway, gasoline burns best at a certain ratio, say 14.7:1. Adding more air via a supercharger throws off the ratio, which you must add more fuel to compensate. Now, I can do that mechanically with fuel delivery. The curve may not be exact, as the 1.6 ecu is expecting certain things at certain rpms which are now off. But you can get it close enough. So that is my thinking. Is that not correct?
The curve is going to suck ***. it'll be either lean before 5.5K so it's not too rich after 5.5K. or it'll be rich before 5.5K and then HELLA SUPER DUPER rich at 5.5K and then you'll wash out your ringlands and blow the motor.
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-07-2013, 10:46 AM
  #45  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by pakron1122
My plan is to use the stock 1.6 ecu.
You're in the running for the prestigious "retard of the year" award.
hustler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
01-03-2016 07:18 PM
konmo
MEGAsquirt
22
11-05-2015 02:32 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
7
09-24-2015 03:50 PM
curly
MEGAsquirt
11
09-22-2015 11:54 AM



Quick Reply: Build: VVT and JRSC in 93 NA



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.