thesnowboarder

iTrader: (15)

Taken from Solomiata cited here:
Solomiata : Engine : Miata MX5 camshaft specifications

The head i am having built had to get decked .020, which means ill be left with a 9.2:1 motor rather than a 8.7:1. My timing wont be spot on, which i guess could be cured with a set of adjustable gears. But my main concern is how safe a lets call it 9.5:1 motor would be with a 2860 absurd flow strapped to it.

I don't like the idea of a thicker headgasket, and i guess the other option would be getting another 99 head and throwing all the supertech hardware into that.

Thoughts guys?

wildfire0310

iTrader: (1)

As for the whole 9.5:1 I wouldn't worry about it. Think about all the people that are running the 99+ block are running 9.5 or more so you be fine.

sixshooter

iTrader: (12)

I'd personally try to find somebody who was going to remain naturally aspirated and see if they would swap with you. That decked head would be ideal for them. I've had roughly half a point make the difference between running 87 octane and 92 octane on a 5.0 Ford I built for my brother many years ago.

You will be able to run a little less boost and a little less timing and make a few less horses with the decked one. That is your trade off. Or you might make the same power with the same tune but have less margin for error.

Life is a series of trade-offs.

NA6C-Guy

iTrader: (1)

I suck, so my head was machined about .035-.040 and the block deck machined another .005 or so. At 15* timing, I sense a little pinging in really hot weather on regular gas. Premium helps a bit. On a turbo, I wouldn't really want any higher compression. My vote is new head.

UrbanSoot

iTrader: (24)

i say you are fine

Rennkafer

iTrader: (3)

If you can get a .020ish thicker head gasket I'd do it... That minimal amount of difference in HG thickness won't make any difference in its sealing ability but could make a fair amount of difference in your power output and what gas you'll have to run. We juggle HG thicknesses all the time at work to get CR's and/or piston to valve clearances where we want.

Savington

iTrader: (31)

Bill, I've seen several folks say that the reduction in squish zone causes a lot of detonation when you deck our heads and then use a thicker head gasket.

I say you're an idiot.

thesnowboarder

iTrader: (15)

A fair amount of difference? This part worries me slightly, i would like to be able to run pump 91 pretty much all the time. Safely. Will a thicker HG mean ill have to fill the car with something higher?

My builder mentioned something about shims, i kind of ignored that thought but does anyone know anything about this and how safe/unsafe it would be?

sixshooter

iTrader: (12)

Thicker gasket means lower compression ratio, not higher, so that might be a solution to the problem.

y8s

iTrader: (8)

thicker head gasket reduces compression
thicker head gasket reduces squish and quench area effectiveness

the latter tends to have a greater negative effect is what Sav is suggesting.


I vote for hogging out the combustion chamber.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

I vote for 11:1 pistons.

LowBoostn

I feel the only potential problem would be if you were to also install high lift turbo cams. High lift, long duration with almost no overlap. i.e. piston to valve contact. Otherwise You can work around all the other stuff so any manifold and turbo combo is not going to change a thing and will be safe. Unless you are asking for the impossiable then nothing is safe.

AlexandertheOk

iTrader: (1)

Dude, just buy shorter rods, duh.

thesnowboarder

iTrader: (15)

It CCed to 8.5:1 so i have nothing to worry about. Thanks for the replies guys

sixshooter

iTrader: (12)

How'd it do that?

thesnowboarder

iTrader: (15)

The pistons were ordered for a 94-95 motor, apparently the 99+ heads have slightly larger combustion chambers? At least that is what my builder is assuming, since it was decked and no porting involved tha'ts the only logical thing we can both think of.

Any other ideas?