Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Honda intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2010, 10:28 AM
  #341  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by shifty35
Staged injection isn't a bad idea. The upstream injectors are way to slow for idle / low rpm, so you'd want to use the stock injectors for idle / low rpm, and switch completely to the upstream injectors at some point.

or you use this:

Braineack is offline  
Old 07-27-2010, 10:31 AM
  #342  
Junior Member
 
shifty35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 56
Total Cats: 0
Default

Eh, I'm not convinced there is enough port velocity at idle for that to actually work, but I could be wrong.

Bisimoto did quite a few staged injection tests that lead him to stick with carbs on his race cars for a long time until injector technology got a lot better.

You have to place an injector like 4 feet upstream to obtain the same atomization quality as a carb!
shifty35 is offline  
Old 07-27-2010, 10:33 AM
  #343  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

basically i can alter when I inject fuel based on load/rpm...so i can compesate for velocities and get a more ideal burnzzzzzzzzzzz and increase MPG and efficiency.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-27-2010, 10:36 AM
  #344  
Junior Member
 
shifty35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 56
Total Cats: 0
Default

Yeah, I understand the table.

I just have doubts that you could get a comparable idle to a port firing injector through injector phase adjustment alone. If you could, I would wager the OEMs would be doing it, since port firing injector is a horrible design compromise for improved idle and lower emissions at the expense of power.

If they could make it work with some software trickery, I imagine you'd see it done from the factory.
shifty35 is offline  
Old 07-27-2010, 12:52 PM
  #345  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Doesn't matter, they're both turds. The square top, while still not ideal, is a vast improvement over any variation of USDM manifolds. That includes hogged out and ported USDM manifolds. The best performing 1.8 N/A manifold I've witnessed is an aftermarket Honda manifold grafted onto a BP4W manifold flange. Big gains everywhere.
OK so this proves my point, that the IM will provide gains for BOTH NA and turbo cars.

What's puzzling is why the NA hp junkies haven't been switching IM's since the first miata, and why it was the turbo ****** who did it in a big way.

I was always skeptical of the claim that "big IM provides gains on turbo cars but not NA cars".
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-27-2010, 12:55 PM
  #346  
Junior Member
 
shifty35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 56
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'd guess it's because the stock manifolds give decent low RPM torque, which the autocross crowd prizes above all else.

Not hard to find a manifold that will perform better up top, but the "gains everywhere" part is probably harder to pull off with a shorter runner manifold.
shifty35 is offline  
Old 07-27-2010, 01:02 PM
  #347  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Agreed.

4000~6500 RPM gains may be considered "everywhere" for autox/track ******.

A manifold that gains from 6000~7000 but loses from 4000~6000 would be a loser if the revlimit is <8000.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 07:17 PM
  #348  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

So I just picked up a D16 stock manifold for free to play around with. the ports match up almost perfectly with the B6, but they are a bit more "oval" and the head will need a bit of port matching.

Other than that, seems like it can be re-drilled.

I'll update with more info later on. Also going to try a B16 mani as well.


How much narrower is the B6 VS the BP for port spacing?
falcon is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 07:42 PM
  #349  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

The honda D series intake manifolds flow like **** compared to honda B series engines.
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 07:45 PM
  #350  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

even the performer x from edelbrock? I'd imagine the D and B edelbrocks are similar if not almost the same.
falcon is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 07:45 PM
  #351  
Junior Member
 
shifty35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 56
Total Cats: 0
Default

So you're comparing a manifold to a whole engine?

There are a ton of aftermarket D series manifolds as well. Edelbrock and Skunk2 make great ones, so does Blox.

Golden Eagle also makes a great FI manifold for D series.
shifty35 is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 07:56 PM
  #352  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

the only reason I'm looking at a D series is because the port spacing is closer and better suited to the B6.
falcon is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 08:08 PM
  #353  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
baron340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lompoc, CA
Posts: 577
Total Cats: 13
Default

The d16y8 intake manifold actually flows really well from the factory. It's a very common swap for a cheap upgrade on turbo setups. I would wager that it doesn't flow quite as well as the factory b16 manis but close enough. They are dirt cheap too.
baron340 is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 09:12 PM
  #354  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

If I am going through the hassle of making a manifold fit, it's going to be done to one that's worth it.

IE... Skunk2 or Performer X
falcon is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 10:03 PM
  #355  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

So it looks like the only way I am going to be able to do this is if I get a B16 manifold, chop the flange off, weld new flange on and use the secondary injector ports further up the runners as the primary and use the edelbrock fuel rail.

Injector tip to injector tip on B16 is 90mm and on B6 is 86mm.
falcon is offline  
Old 08-07-2010, 10:05 PM
  #356  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

Anyone think of trying a 4A-GE manifold on the B6?
falcon is offline  
Old 08-09-2010, 04:54 PM
  #357  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
leatherface24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pembroke Pines
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
Default

No but try it
leatherface24 is offline  
Old 08-09-2010, 07:10 PM
  #358  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

nah... I just saw levnubbin's build thread and I'm going to do the same thing with an edelbrock manifold.
falcon is offline  
Old 08-09-2010, 08:08 PM
  #359  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

So this is a type R manifold and B6 flange.

Name:  IMG_0788.jpg
Views: 709
Size:  66.3 KB

By the looks of the runners on there, it seems they line up alright but by the looks of it it seems the edelbrock may line up almost perfect because the runners dont taper in as much.

What do you think?

falcon is offline  
Old 08-09-2010, 08:55 PM
  #360  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

My manifold is a blox manifold. Savington put the same manifold on his VVT head, check his build thread for 1.8 fitment.

I don't like the price of the edelbrock manifold, leatherface just scored a Blox mani on ebay for $135 shipped. If you search google you can find them for under $200 brand new.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  


Quick Reply: Honda intake manifold



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.