Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

N/A is best (weight loss)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2015, 09:22 PM
  #1  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default N/A is best (weight loss)



Attached Thumbnails N/A is best (weight loss)-20151028_160624.jpg   N/A is best (weight loss)-20151028_160524.jpg  
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 10-28-2015, 11:13 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
AlwaysBroken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: TAMPA, FL
Posts: 817
Total Cats: 20
Default

So you saved 11 pounds and gave up only a few hundred hp? Sweet.

edit- please don't ban me
AlwaysBroken is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 08:55 AM
  #3  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

No, I'm building a very lightweight tube chassis car. Target 1500lbs wet with cage. It was always going to be n/a. 11 lbs savings up front is huge.

I don't want the 40+ lbs that a turbo would add. May do a K24 swap later...
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 10:11 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
OneTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 396
Total Cats: 36
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
No, I'm building a very lightweight tube chassis car. Target 1500lbs wet with cage. It was always going to be n/a. 11 lbs savings up front is huge.

I don't want the 40+ lbs that a turbo would add. May do a K24 swap later...
You'll save a few more Oz with those carbon horns! Glad to see you got them Ok!
OneTwo is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 10:18 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
AlwaysBroken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: TAMPA, FL
Posts: 817
Total Cats: 20
Default

So why not a rotary swap? It would be a bunch lighter. The only downsides are crappy fuel efficiency and other practical concerns.
AlwaysBroken is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 12:21 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
So why not a rotary swap? It would be a bunch lighter. The only downsides are crappy fuel efficiency and other practical concerns.
Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
So why not a rotary swap?
Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
.
Dunning Kruger Affect is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 12:54 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Huntington, Indiana
Posts: 2,885
Total Cats: 616
Default

Monk is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 01:05 PM
  #8  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
.
Wish I could prop
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TorqueZombie
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
10-13-2015 10:40 PM
GeneSplicer
Race Prep
71
11-05-2012 04:19 PM
Gryff
Race Prep
1
03-16-2011 09:15 PM



Quick Reply: N/A is best (weight loss)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM.