Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Power Potential of Turbo vs. Motor... Uh, maybe not the best title

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2013, 03:37 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
hankclaussen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 369
Total Cats: 62
Default Power Potential of Turbo vs. Motor... Uh, maybe not the best title

So I may be subject to being put on blast for this as I haven't researched, but I may also be a little buzzed...

When a motor is built it is assumed that higher boost may be used, but why? I am comparing the puny 2554 output at 15psi to say a 2560 at 12psi, and I am not sure (in my current state) why, if a 1.6 can handle a 2560 at 12psi relative to power output of the motor why it couldn't take a 2554 at 15psi; or could it?

In any discussion I have seen about selecting the right turbo for a built motor, it seems to be stated that the big power guys say ditch the 2860 'cuz the motor can handle high psi of a bigger more powerful turbo and the track guys go with the 2860 only for heat.

can I has mor booosht? Really probably not going to do it either way, just curious to be spoon fed. please and thank you.
hankclaussen is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 04:02 AM
  #2  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,022
Total Cats: 304
Default

thirdgen is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 08:18 AM
  #3  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

lolwut?
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 08:18 AM
  #4  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,179
Total Cats: 1,129
Default

I think I get you. Think of a straw vs tube. 15 psi out of a straw wouldn't be too much but out of a 3" tube would be a considerable amount of force. Now the rods bend at the same torque figures, about 225ish for stock, so 15psi out of a 2554, or 8psi out of one of the larger turbos.

However, I can't tell you why, but I seem to remember there being a reason why the same power with less pressure in a bigger turbo is better, even after ignoring head room and compressor efficiency maps. Someone better than I will have to comment.

Edit: wait, does it have something to do with p=v*t or whatever? Cause more pressure with the same volume would equal more heat.
curly is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 08:19 AM
  #5  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

to limit all the low end torque and impress your friends with the shitty boost threshold?
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 09:20 AM
  #6  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

:NewOrleansWest:
hustler is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 02-02-2013, 01:01 PM
  #7  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,022
Total Cats: 304
Default

More boost equals higher intake temps. That's why it's better to run a big turbo at low boost than I small turbo at high boost.
thirdgen is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 05:54 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Lee04vr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia Beach, Va
Posts: 139
Total Cats: 5
Default

Higher intake temps = less timing advance = less torque.
Lee04vr is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 05:57 PM
  #9  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

id rather have a 2554 making 225hp than a 2560 doing the same.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 06:15 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
hankclaussen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 369
Total Cats: 62
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
id rather have a 2554 making 225hp than a 2560 doing the same.
Right. Me too, but that's going to be higher than 12psi right?

Last edited by hankclaussen; 02-02-2013 at 06:41 PM.
hankclaussen is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 06:19 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gearhead_318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
Default

Originally Posted by thirdgen
More boost equals higher intake temps. That's why it's better to run a big turbo at low boost than I small turbo at high boost.
Plus you have the option to up the boost when you get tired of what you currently have without having to swap out the turbo.
gearhead_318 is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 06:37 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
hankclaussen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 369
Total Cats: 62
Default

Originally Posted by gearhead_318
Plus you have the option to up the boost when you get tired of what you currently have without having to swap out the turbo.
but laaaaaaaaag?
hankclaussen is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 07:01 PM
  #13  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
id rather have a 2554 making 225hp than a 2560 doing the same.
OMFG you little turbo crybaby ------s never shut up about this ****. Try vagina, seriously. I want a turbo that won't make target boost earlier than 3500rpm. That way I can get a larger turbine housing to make real torque.

I am a turboless ------.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 07:48 PM
  #14  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,022
Total Cats: 304
Default

I liked when my sr20 made 225whp @ 12psi, I'd love a 3076 that makes 225 at like 8 psi. I just feel that I'd be wasting a turbo unless I use it to it's max.
thirdgen is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 07:50 PM
  #15  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

to aim for 225 on a 3076 is stupid. might as well buy a honda with boltons
I was at 300 and often felt I was wasting the turbos potential
18psi is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 08:08 PM
  #16  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

IMO, you first get a power goal, then you figure out the smallest turbo that will meet that power goal without having to seriously over stress the turbo. IE if you want to make 230 wheel, you can squeeze that out of a td04-13t, but you'll have to run right up to or maybe past the edge of the compressor map.
Leafy is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 08:16 PM
  #17  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,022
Total Cats: 304
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
to aim for 225 on a 3076 is stupid. might as well buy a honda with boltons
I was at 300 and often felt I was wasting the turbos potential
Exactly. Since my goal is 240whp, I'm just gonna max out my sr20 and not feel bad.
thirdgen is offline  
Old 02-03-2013, 01:03 AM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
viperormiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
Default

With the current drought in proper street tires I'm starting to wonder if it's worth even going above 300whp.

OP, ****, just read the stickies and get a ride in a turbo car.
viperormiata is offline  
Old 02-03-2013, 01:08 AM
  #19  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

OP is assuming that there's a boost limit on our engines.

OP needs to never think this again.
Savington is offline  
Old 02-03-2013, 02:28 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
mr_hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 798
Total Cats: 24
Default

Pressure build heat. Heat is stress. Little turbos spool fast and blow hot air at the top. Big turbos blow hurricane status at a lower pressure with cool air but take a bit longer to get there. It's all a balance.

EFRs blow unicorn farts that spool instantly with air from the arctic. Compressor map gives me wood but makes my wallet hurt. Maybe next season...
mr_hyde is offline  


Quick Reply: Power Potential of Turbo vs. Motor... Uh, maybe not the best title



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.