Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Track crew: What do you have in the top end?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2009, 12:54 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rennkafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
shim under bucket conversion
Why?

In my experience this is generally done to accept larger lifters to deal with long duration and/or super high lift cams. Is there a Miata-specific reason for this or are you changing cams too?
Rennkafer is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 01:04 AM
  #22  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,180
Total Cats: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Oh thank god. Mazdacomp FTW.
HLA's FTW.

What do I have in the top end? Nada. Refreshed stock head with about 20,000 miles on it and a dozen or so track days.

I know this doesn't help you what so ever, but I thought I'd point out the lameness of my car one more time.
curly is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 07:46 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
bryanlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 291
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Oh thank god. Mazdacomp FTW.
Do I dare ask? How much are they thru Mazdacomp?
bryanlow is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 10:24 AM
  #24  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Rennkafer
Why?

In my experience this is generally done to accept larger lifters to deal with long duration and/or super high lift cams. Is there a Miata-specific reason for this or are you changing cams too?
I may do cams at some point (I phrase it this way because my build is as yet unscheduled and unbudgeted), but it's mostly because it's a little awesome and is one more thing that will let me spin a few grand higher more safely.

I just like to do things to do things.
y8s is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 12:18 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rennkafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
Default

[QUOTE=y8s;431826]I may do cams at some point... but it's mostly because it's a little awesome and is one more thing that will let me spin a few grand higher more safely. [QUOTE]


A fair number of the engines I deal with at work are shim under bucket (Cosworth BD, Cosworth DFV, BMW M12, Lotus Twincam) and they're without exception a PITA and time consuming to adjust shims on. I'd think twice about that mod unless you really need it.
Rennkafer is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 02:24 PM
  #26  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Rennkafer
A fair number of the engines I deal with at work are shim under bucket (Cosworth BD, Cosworth DFV, BMW M12, Lotus Twincam) and they're without exception a PITA and time consuming to adjust shims on. I'd think twice about that mod unless you really need it.
good thing I only plan to do it once!
y8s is offline  
Old 07-20-2009, 12:58 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
blrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO.
Posts: 133
Total Cats: 0
Default

Do HLA's need to be replaced as well? I'm looking at upgrading springs but hardly ever hear of anyone getting new lifters.
blrx7r1 is offline  
Old 07-20-2009, 01:51 PM
  #28  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

The money you'll spend on springs, retainers and seats will get you most of the way to a '99 head swap. Do that instead - the benefit is far greater.
Savington is offline  
Old 07-20-2009, 08:49 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
l_bader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Alamo City, Tejas
Posts: 771
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
Headwork is great and all, but its a lot cheaper to slap on a 99 head and twist the boost controller.
Do the headwork on the 99 head before putting it on an earlier engine...

- L

(The answer to the cry, "more power!" is simply, "more money!")
l_bader is offline  
Old 07-20-2009, 09:37 PM
  #30  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by l_bader
Do the headwork on the 99 head before putting it on an earlier engine...

- L

(The answer to the cry, "more power!" is simply, "more money!")
actually rumor has it that you can take off more material on the early head and it will flow better than the 99. A friend of mine just dropped his head off at Endyne, so we'll know something soon.
hustler is offline  
Old 07-20-2009, 10:19 PM
  #31  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
actually rumor has it that you can take off more material on the early head and it will flow better than the 99. A friend of mine just dropped his head off at Endyne, so we'll know something soon.
Total bullshit. Port height is like 50 degrees on the 94 head, 20-something on the 99 head. I remember seeing flowbench numbers of 175cfm for a stock 94 head, 205cfm for a fully ported 94 head, and 210cfm for a stock 99 head.
Savington is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 03:34 AM
  #32  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
thesnowboarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Incline Village, NV
Posts: 2,034
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Total bullshit. Port height is like 50 degrees on the 94 head, 20-something on the 99 head. I remember seeing flowbench numbers of 175cfm for a stock 94 head, 205cfm for a fully ported 94 head, and 210cfm for a stock 99 head.
Good to know that the ported 95 head in my garage should flow relatively close to a 99 head.
thesnowboarder is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 07:56 AM
  #33  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Total bullshit. Port height is like 50 degrees on the 94 head, 20-something on the 99 head. I remember seeing flowbench numbers of 175cfm for a stock 94 head, 205cfm for a fully ported 94 head, and 210cfm for a stock 99 head.
Supposedly Endyn has an NA miata motor that made 240crank ponies. I'll let them tell me what to do, not some kid who lives in his mom's basement.
hustler is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 12:34 PM
  #34  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
blrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO.
Posts: 133
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
The money you'll spend on springs, retainers and seats will get you most of the way to a '99 head swap. Do that instead - the benefit is far greater.
I'm already in to deep on the 94 head (it's been mildly ported) that I've got. So I think I'll just stick with it.

So as to HLA's anyone know if it's a good idea to replace them?
blrx7r1 is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 03:12 AM
  #35  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
thesnowboarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Incline Village, NV
Posts: 2,034
Total Cats: 5
Default

Alright so it looks like their are a few different strength supertech springs avaliable for the miata. I assume that we would want the stiffest ones, but am unsure.

Any specific springs we should be looking at?

Specifically:
49lbs@36.80mm
74lbs @ 34.20mm
70lbs @ 33.50mm
56lbs @ 34.20mm
58lbs @ 34.10mm

Link:
BELFAB RACING PRODUCTS

Is there any place other than belfab that we can get miata specific supertech springs? I had a pretty bad experience with their rods and all around dealing with them.
thesnowboarder is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 08:18 AM
  #36  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

You want the lightest spring per rpm/lift range.
hustler is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 03:44 PM
  #37  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
thesnowboarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Incline Village, NV
Posts: 2,034
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
You want the lightest spring per rpm/lift range.
Thanks for the response, but why do we want lighter vs heavier?
thesnowboarder is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 03:51 PM
  #38  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

From what I understand, heavier springs will excessively load the cam lobes and wear down the cams and lifters faster. You want enough spring load to keep the valves from floating at max RPM, with a little margin, and not more than that.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 03:53 PM
  #39  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

zx-tex speaks the gospel. Put money in the cup!
hustler is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 06:55 PM
  #40  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
thesnowboarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Incline Village, NV
Posts: 2,034
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
From what I understand, heavier springs will excessively load the cam lobes and wear down the cams and lifters faster. You want enough spring load to keep the valves from floating at max RPM, with a little margin, and not more than that.
So lightest is best, but how light?

Anyone know what the length of the 99 springs are?

Thanks guys
thesnowboarder is offline  


Quick Reply: Track crew: What do you have in the top end?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.