Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

VVT + Supertech pistons = interference engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2010, 08:48 PM
  #21  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

I don't have a 99 head lying around. The VVT intake cam supposedly has more lift.

The c/r of the pistons shouldn't matter because the depth and location of the cutouts are fixes wrt to the piston pin. The outer edge of the deck of the piston is the same across the different c/r pistons.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 03-03-2010, 12:58 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rennkafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Mostly trying to get an idea for what the limitation is as far as valve lift goes.

Jason, do you have a '99 head laying around that you can take the same measurement on? If the '99 head is still non-interference with 8.6:1 Weiscos then IMO it's safe to assume that full advance on the VVT won't cause an issue (if more cam retard = tighter clearances as neo said).
Retarding the cams = more clearance, advancing = less clearance.
Rennkafer is offline  
Old 03-03-2010, 02:11 AM
  #23  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

I have a '99 head lying around, albeit with oversize intake valves. Bring one of your pistons over and we can check it.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 03-03-2010, 08:20 AM
  #24  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Rennkafer
Retarding the cams = more clearance, advancing = less clearance.
Don't forget V-V clearance if we are talking about higher lift cams. Although on a miata I don't know what lift it would take to ever make V-V contact happen.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 03-04-2010, 01:16 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rennkafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
Don't forget V-V clearance if we are talking about higher lift cams. Although on a miata I don't know what lift it would take to ever make V-V contact happen.
I wasn't, but the topic was piston to valve clearance. It's usually a combination of lift and more duration that gets you valve to valve clearance issues.

You're completely right though, if I were going to be making larger cams for a VVT engine I'd be checking valve to piston and valve to valve clearance carefully.
Rennkafer is offline  
Old 03-04-2010, 03:30 AM
  #26  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by JKav
Jason, out of curiosity what is the deck clearance with those pistons?
I just measured them and they are about 0.028" below the deck.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 03-05-2010, 05:46 AM
  #27  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Duckie_uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 439
Total Cats: 0
Default

Modify the pistons slightly? As a bonus you get an even lower CR.
Duckie_uk is offline  
Old 03-05-2010, 07:29 AM
  #28  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Faeflora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
Default

Originally Posted by Duckie_uk
Modify the pistons slightly? As a bonus you get an even lower CR.
That sounds like a good idea. Just hacksaw off that protruding edge.
Faeflora is offline  
Old 03-05-2010, 04:14 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Duckie_uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 439
Total Cats: 0
Default

I was thinking more along the lines of getting an end mill in to increase the depth of the valve reliefs but your way sounds good too
Duckie_uk is offline  
Old 03-05-2010, 04:29 PM
  #30  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,176
Total Cats: 1,680
Default

Originally Posted by faeflora
That sounds like a good idea. Just hacksaw off that protruding edge.
Then add a quarter in the middle with JB Weld to get the compression back to 8.6:1.
shuiend is offline  
Old 03-05-2010, 09:23 PM
  #31  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Faeflora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
Default

Well if you want, you could go to 8.6.2 so you would have a balanced even ratio. The extra .1 could be gained by jb welding a dime to add the .1. The quarter actually adds .25.
Faeflora is offline  
Old 03-06-2010, 12:41 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rennkafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Duckie_uk
I was thinking more along the lines of getting an end mill in to increase the depth of the valve reliefs but your way sounds good too
A flycutter works better as you can put a larger radius in the base of the valve pocket. The sharp corners a regular end mill leaves aren't radiused enough.
Rennkafer is offline  
Old 03-06-2010, 03:44 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Duckie_uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 439
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rennkafer
A flycutter works better as you can put a larger radius in the base of the valve pocket. The sharp corners a regular end mill leaves aren't radiused enough.
You can buy radiused end mills. We refer to them as bull nosed cutters in my shop. I suppose it would be up to whoever did the job.
Duckie_uk is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 02:52 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rennkafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Duckie_uk
You can buy radiused end mills. We refer to them as bull nosed cutters in my shop. I suppose it would be up to whoever did the job.
I know... but you can grind a flycutter in a few minutes and not have to order it. You're right though, it is sort of a preference thing. If I was going to be doing a ton of valve pocket cutting of the same pocket size I'd get the mill. For a once in a while thing or if you're doing a bunch of different pocket sizes I'd use the flycutter.
Rennkafer is offline  
Old 03-28-2010, 10:55 PM
  #35  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Piston to valve clearance with my 8.6:1 84mm Supertech pistons, to standard size intake valves on my VVT head with stock cam, around 3 mm at full cam advance.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:09 PM
  #36  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
AbeFM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 12
Default

Sigh, guess I'll want to be checking my wisecos, they aren't FM's... Is there an easy way to tell FM's part number from the "regular" miata wisecos?

The VVT cam does have more lift. I have both heads, but not the pistons handy. I would love to go to a higher lift cam at some point.... Would like to think I'm not going to be in any trouble here. Certainly more pocketing and less compression would work well.

Jason - your measurements are vertical, or in the slope of the valve?
AbeFM is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 05:30 PM
  #37  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

3 mm = thinnest point of the lump of clay that got squished.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 05:46 PM
  #38  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,176
Total Cats: 1,680
Default

Jason,
I just ordered a set of these last week and from what I have understood from this thread is that as long as I change my timing belt religiously and it does not break I should be fine right?
shuiend is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 08:06 PM
  #39  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
AbeFM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Does anyone have a page of the 01 cam belt / tooth alignment procedure handy? The VVT intake cam gear doesn't have a convenient mark and the mark I made got erased.
Did you ever find these? I'm just about to plop a head on my motor.....

Originally Posted by Savington
Mostly trying to get an idea for what the limitation is as far as valve lift goes.
You and me both. :-) I've got wisecos, but I'm really curious

Originally Posted by shuiend
Jason,
I just ordered a set of these last week and from what I have understood from this thread is that as long as I change my timing belt religiously and it does not break I should be fine right?
That's the idea. :-)

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
3 mm = thinnest point of the lump of clay that got squished.
I meant when you posted measurements from the ring land down. So I can measure mine.
AbeFM is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 08:53 PM
  #40  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Correct. I think only badly neglected miata motors break their timing belts.
JasonC SBB is offline  


Quick Reply: VVT + Supertech pistons = interference engine



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.