Vaccuum block a solution for strong boost signal?
#1
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
Vaccuum block a solution for strong boost signal?
I've read more than one thread from people trying to get a good strong boost signal to their MS and that has gotten me thinking.. I seem to have a good vac signal to my MS - the line is straight off the intake manifold and has no T's or anything, but my MAP does oscillate a bit according to my datalogs and I wonder if an even cleaner signal could be had... also, my boost gauge is not spot on accurate - it seems to read just about 1 psi lower than what the MS is seeing. The vac line for my boost gauge T's into the same line that supplies my FPR.. So I got to wondering if using a Vac distribution block could ensure a clean MAP signal to the MS, boost gauge, FPR, etc. better than all these T's and stuff and if buying one would be worth it... anyone's thoughts?
If I knew how to take a screenshot I would take one of a datalog to show what I mean about my MAP oscillations.
-Ryan
If I knew how to take a screenshot I would take one of a datalog to show what I mean about my MAP oscillations.
-Ryan
#2
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 0
on the ms pages theres a solution to this
they recommend taking a good old fashioned fuel filter and putting that inline from the mani to the map sensor
i have jsut run a really long pipe and looped it and it worked well for me
try the fuel filter and post back if it solves it
they recommend taking a good old fashioned fuel filter and putting that inline from the mani to the map sensor
i have jsut run a really long pipe and looped it and it worked well for me
try the fuel filter and post back if it solves it
#3
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
I will give that a shot but I am also very curious about why my boost gauge (jackson racing brand if it matters) is reading lower than what MS tells me the car is seeing..
On partial throttle, when I start hearing the turbo begin to do some work and the MS is registering 0 - 0.5 psi, the gauge is pointing at -2 psi. At full boost if I have the car set for 7 psi according to MS, the boost gauge will only go up to 6 psi. This seems to me that perhaps T'ing off an existing vac line is not the optimal way to supply things like the gauge or the FPR with vac signal... this is why I was looking into the vacuum blocks..
I liked the look of the one Tuner Toyz was selling but their website now says the 'merchant's store has been closed'...
-Ryan
On partial throttle, when I start hearing the turbo begin to do some work and the MS is registering 0 - 0.5 psi, the gauge is pointing at -2 psi. At full boost if I have the car set for 7 psi according to MS, the boost gauge will only go up to 6 psi. This seems to me that perhaps T'ing off an existing vac line is not the optimal way to supply things like the gauge or the FPR with vac signal... this is why I was looking into the vacuum blocks..
I liked the look of the one Tuner Toyz was selling but their website now says the 'merchant's store has been closed'...
-Ryan
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
Differences in calibration and/or accuracy (and resolution) of the design. If you try a third gauge, you will either get a consensus with one of your other gauges or a third answer entirely.
I have three dial type tire pressure gauges (one in each of three different vehicles) and they have a 4 psi variance between them. Go figure.
I have three dial type tire pressure gauges (one in each of three different vehicles) and they have a 4 psi variance between them. Go figure.
#5
I was going to post this same question today. Begi says to cut into the line going to the brake booster before the check valve and install their "line tap". I was wondering if the vacuum signal is the same everywhere, whether pulled from the booster line or the manifold. At this time, I only need vacuum for the recirc BOV.
#7
I had my gauge and ECU tapped into the brake booster line and didn't like it. You could even see in the datalogs each time that I hit and released the brakes. It's also not a good idea to share a vac port between the BOV and ECU, that caused some really wacky stuff when I was at part throttle just enough to make the BOV bounce a bit. I finally tapped two 1/8 NPT holes on top of my manifold. One offset a little from the PCV line with a T on it for the gauge and BOV, and one by itself offset a little from where the brake booster connects for the computer.
#9
You don't want to 'stabilize' the vac, a vac canister will dampen and really slow the response. That would cause even more problems. You just want a good reliable representation of the current manifold pressure.
#10
I think that I am getting confused here. Vacuum is different from manifold pressure, right? I mean, manifold pressure can go from negative to positive, depending on whether you are in boost or not. This obviously won't work for, say the brake booster which is vacuum only. The BOV needs to be attached to vacuum. I guess that is why Begi cuts it into the brake booster line. Vacuum all the time. Positive pressure would be bad, right?
#11
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Outside Portland Maine
Posts: 2,023
Total Cats: 19
I think that I am getting confused here. Vacuum is different from manifold pressure, right? I mean, manifold pressure can go from negative to positive, depending on whether you are in boost or not. This obviously won't work for, say the brake booster which is vacuum only. The BOV needs to be attached to vacuum. I guess that is why Begi cuts it into the brake booster line. Vacuum all the time. Positive pressure would be bad, right?
Positive pressure for the BOV is not bad, it's actually helpful for keeping the valve closed. I *think* the check valve for the brake booster is very close to the booster itself, leaving plenty of room for your BOV attachment before that check valve.
#12
As for a signal to MS, you want a very small diameter vacuum hose going from the back of the manifold to the MS. You don't want a "strong" signal. You just want a smooth signal as to reduce noise and keep acceleration enrichments from coming on. As mentioned, a filter inline helps to damp the signal. Running a huge line to MS would be a bad idea. Oh, and this topic has been beat to death by the way.
#14
Yeah there is some confusion and I'm partially responsible, sorry.
The ECU, Boost Gauge, and BOV need to see manifold pressure.
The brake booster, cruise control, emissions stuff and VICS need to see vac only.
For an accurate signal to the ECU, you need a narrow ID hose attached to an independent tap on the manifold to reference manifold pressure.
For things that need vac only you can install a check valve and a vac canister to ensure that they still have vac while the manifold is under pressure from the turbo.
The ECU, Boost Gauge, and BOV need to see manifold pressure.
The brake booster, cruise control, emissions stuff and VICS need to see vac only.
For an accurate signal to the ECU, you need a narrow ID hose attached to an independent tap on the manifold to reference manifold pressure.
For things that need vac only you can install a check valve and a vac canister to ensure that they still have vac while the manifold is under pressure from the turbo.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zaphod
MEGAsquirt
47
10-26-2018 11:00 PM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
09-30-2015 02:44 PM