I call BS on these IRTB/1.9 numbers...
11-09-2009, 01:31 PM
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,199
Total Cats: 145
I call BS on these IRTB/1.9 numbers...
ClubRoadster.net
The car is dope, but those Japs are lying.
Engine
Maximum Output: 320PS (315hp) @ 8500 RPM
Maximum torque: 35Kg (253 ft-lb) @ 6,700 RPM
Built by: Maruha Motors
Displacement: 1930cc
Bore × stroke: 85.0mm × 85.0mm
Compression ratio: 12.7: 1
Intake system: TOYOTA 4AG individual throttles
ECU: MoTeC M48-ADV ROG
Ignition coil: MoTeC
CDI: MoTeC
Cam: Toda Racing 300 degree 10.7mm lift
Lifter: Toda Racing shim under bucket solid mechanical type
Valve spring: Toda Racing strengthened type
Timing gear: Toda Racing adjustable
Piston: Toda Racing forged 85.0mm φ
Connecting rod: Crower
Crank: Original crank lightened and polished
Head Gasket: Toda Racing 0.8 mm
Oil cooler radiator
Nitrous oxide: Dry shot × 8
Drivetrain
Clutch: ATS carbon clutch
Transmission: MATSUDA SUPIDO FURUKUROSUMISSHON (???)
LSD: ATS carbon LSD
Final Drive Ratio: 5.1:1
Edit: just reread the post and it looks like their claiming that with nitrious...wtf, thats kind of lame
The car is dope, but those Japs are lying.
Engine
Maximum Output: 320PS (315hp) @ 8500 RPM
Maximum torque: 35Kg (253 ft-lb) @ 6,700 RPM
Built by: Maruha Motors
Displacement: 1930cc
Bore × stroke: 85.0mm × 85.0mm
Compression ratio: 12.7: 1
Intake system: TOYOTA 4AG individual throttles
ECU: MoTeC M48-ADV ROG
Ignition coil: MoTeC
CDI: MoTeC
Cam: Toda Racing 300 degree 10.7mm lift
Lifter: Toda Racing shim under bucket solid mechanical type
Valve spring: Toda Racing strengthened type
Timing gear: Toda Racing adjustable
Piston: Toda Racing forged 85.0mm φ
Connecting rod: Crower
Crank: Original crank lightened and polished
Head Gasket: Toda Racing 0.8 mm
Oil cooler radiator
Nitrous oxide: Dry shot × 8
Drivetrain
Clutch: ATS carbon clutch
Transmission: MATSUDA SUPIDO FURUKUROSUMISSHON (???)
LSD: ATS carbon LSD
Final Drive Ratio: 5.1:1
Edit: just reread the post and it looks like their claiming that with nitrious...wtf, thats kind of lame
Last edited by jacob300zx; 11-09-2009 at 01:43 PM.
Reply
0
0
11-09-2009, 01:44 PM
#3
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,199
Total Cats: 145
yup just read that, well anything is possible with nitrious so i guess this is a fail.
Would that even work for 1 lap, idk if a big bottle would even last that long. they are obviously running a 100 shot or more.
Would that even work for 1 lap, idk if a big bottle would even last that long. they are obviously running a 100 shot or more.
Reply
0
0
11-09-2009, 01:44 PM
#4
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Yah its impossible to make those numbers N/A.
I cant remember if it was on here or on M.net, but at some poin I did the calculations to show that it would require an impossibly high brake mean effective pressure to make that much torque from a 1.9L engine, the power numbers are possibly from a 1.9L but it would require reving the engine to an extremely high rpm. Ill see if I can find the thread...
EDIT: found it.
I cant remember if it was on here or on M.net, but at some poin I did the calculations to show that it would require an impossibly high brake mean effective pressure to make that much torque from a 1.9L engine, the power numbers are possibly from a 1.9L but it would require reving the engine to an extremely high rpm. Ill see if I can find the thread...
EDIT: found it.
O ****, I thought they said they were making 215 hp, not 315.
315 hp/250 ft lbs is impossible, those numbers have to be with the nitrous...
BMEP = 150.8 x TRQ / Displacement
1930cc = 117.8 ci
150.8 x 253 ft-lbs / 117.8 cu in = 323 PSI
Its pretty widely accepted that 190-200 PSI is the limit for a otto cycle engine
Not even Formula 1 engines exceed 200 PSI by much.
So yah, those numbers are impossible without nitrous of forced induction.
315 hp/250 ft lbs is impossible, those numbers have to be with the nitrous...
BMEP = 150.8 x TRQ / Displacement
1930cc = 117.8 ci
150.8 x 253 ft-lbs / 117.8 cu in = 323 PSI
Its pretty widely accepted that 190-200 PSI is the limit for a otto cycle engine
Not even Formula 1 engines exceed 200 PSI by much.
So yah, those numbers are impossible without nitrous of forced induction.
Lets say that they put huge amounts of money into the engine and really maximized it in every way and were able to get a brake mean effective pressure of 200 psi.
200 psi = 150.8 x TRQ / 117 ci in
TRQ = 155 ft lbs
so the maximum torque output possible would be around 155 ft lbs
now lets say that they tuned the power band so it makes peak torque at 8000 rpm, for maximum power
155 ft lbs x 8000 rpm / 5252 = 236 hp
so there yah go, the maximum output of a 1.93 L engine in the sub-9k rpm range is going to be 155 ft lbs/ 236 hp
EDIT:
but yah, for a 2.1L engine it would be 170 ft lbs and 259 hp at 8000 rpm
200 psi = 150.8 x TRQ / 117 ci in
TRQ = 155 ft lbs
so the maximum torque output possible would be around 155 ft lbs
now lets say that they tuned the power band so it makes peak torque at 8000 rpm, for maximum power
155 ft lbs x 8000 rpm / 5252 = 236 hp
so there yah go, the maximum output of a 1.93 L engine in the sub-9k rpm range is going to be 155 ft lbs/ 236 hp
EDIT:
but yah, for a 2.1L engine it would be 170 ft lbs and 259 hp at 8000 rpm
Reply
0
0
11-09-2009, 03:15 PM
#8
that car is sick. old news tho'. it was already determined that the car made
2xx.xx whp. the 320 is some other form of measurement, and on an engine dyno, not a chassis dyno.
and i would take the easy route and kill hustler for that car.........................
....after he killed all of y'all!
2xx.xx whp. the 320 is some other form of measurement, and on an engine dyno, not a chassis dyno.
and i would take the easy route and kill hustler for that car.........................
....after he killed all of y'all!
Reply
0
0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frank_and_Beans
Supercharger Discussion
13
09-12-2016 08:17 PM
