Obama Pic
03-12-2009, 06:21 PM
#101
But if we legalize Marijuania, it will start a chain-reaction...Ectasy isn't harmful....Shrooms aren't harmful....etc. I say we just enforce what we got on the books already and after some potheads spend a few months in the new jail system, they won't need rehab, cause the high would never be worth the time.
And I've never smoked pot. Been stuck in a room with some friends who were, that's as close as I got. I prefer natural highs, it's free, no side-affects.
And I've never smoked pot. Been stuck in a room with some friends who were, that's as close as I got. I prefer natural highs, it's free, no side-affects.
Reply
0
0
03-12-2009, 06:37 PM
#102
But if we legalize Marijuania, it will start a chain-reaction...Ectasy isn't harmful....Shrooms aren't harmful....etc. I say we just enforce what we got on the books already and after some potheads spend a few months in the new jail system, they won't need rehab, cause the high would never be worth the time.
And I've never smoked pot. Been stuck in a room with some friends who were, that's as close as I got. I prefer natural highs, it's free, no side-affects.
And I've never smoked pot. Been stuck in a room with some friends who were, that's as close as I got. I prefer natural highs, it's free, no side-affects.
Reply
0
0
03-12-2009, 07:16 PM
#106
But if we legalize Marijuania, it will start a chain-reaction...Ectasy isn't harmful....Shrooms aren't harmful....etc. I say we just enforce what we got on the books already and after some potheads spend a few months in the new jail system, they won't need rehab, cause the high would never be worth the time.
And I've never smoked pot. Been stuck in a room with some friends who were, that's as close as I got. I prefer natural highs, it's free, no side-affects.
And I've never smoked pot. Been stuck in a room with some friends who were, that's as close as I got. I prefer natural highs, it's free, no side-affects.
Now Ectasy on the other hand can have the potential to kill you on the first try. Those more hardcore drugs could be sold but in much lower quantities. IDK, I understand the concern but seriously, more drunk drivers kill people than drug users.
And if we ever decided to read history, the big Mafias of the past all had their hand in when there was prohibition. I bet they wouldn't have had the power so quickly those laws were not enacted. Lots of people wanted their booze then. Lots of people want their drugs now. Who supplies them? The same ones that chop off heads at the border.
Reply
0
0
03-12-2009, 08:34 PM
#107
I say the government should legalize weed, and they be the only ones to sell it. That way all the dope smokers can help pay into the system to pay for ****. The government could make a killing. They could tax the crap out of the stuff and fund the transportation system.
I don't smoke, don't drink, don't smoke weed, never tried it, never will. However, I don't care if other peeps do.
I don't smoke, don't drink, don't smoke weed, never tried it, never will. However, I don't care if other peeps do.
Reply
0
0
03-13-2009, 12:03 AM
#110
I say the government should legalize weed, and they be the only ones to sell it. That way all the dope smokers can help pay into the system to pay for ****. The government could make a killing. They could tax the crap out of the stuff and fund the transportation system.
I don't smoke, don't drink, don't smoke weed, never tried it, never will. However, I don't care if other peeps do.
I don't smoke, don't drink, don't smoke weed, never tried it, never will. However, I don't care if other peeps do.
Reply
0
0
03-13-2009, 12:07 AM
#111
Bullshit, there is documented scientific evidence that those other drugs you mention has some serious affects. There is also plenty of research that will tell you weed is no more harmfull than cigs and alcohol. People that have never used maijuana always resort to this inaccurate arguement because they don't know any better. And for the record, I don't use drugs of any kind. I did as a teenager but I'm 45 now and haven't since I was 17.
For the record:
Most of my friends do pot. I just don't hang out with them when they do, and they know they aren't to do it around me. Same goes for drinking and smoking. I'm not gonna make alcohol and tobacco illegal, even though I am 100% against it.
Reply
0
0
Ecstasy, LSD, coke, crack, etc.
03-13-2009, 04:39 PM
#116
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 698
Total Cats: 0
Right, and a delusional and paranoid mass public is totally what we need...
The difference is that Marijuana is mind altering to a level that makes them dysfunctional. Similar to Alcohol. Think about how much money is spent just trying to keep drunk drivers off the streets, now double it. It's potentially more cancerous that cigarettes (no one has any paper filters on em yet), and it really almost comes down to more of a matter of principle.
The difference is that Marijuana is mind altering to a level that makes them dysfunctional. Similar to Alcohol. Think about how much money is spent just trying to keep drunk drivers off the streets, now double it. It's potentially more cancerous that cigarettes (no one has any paper filters on em yet), and it really almost comes down to more of a matter of principle.
Reply
0
0
03-13-2009, 06:31 PM
#117
Right, and a delusional and paranoid mass public is totally what we need...
The difference is that Marijuana is mind altering to a level that makes them dysfunctional. Similar to Alcohol. Think about how much money is spent just trying to keep drunk drivers off the streets, now double it. It's potentially more cancerous that cigarettes (no one has any paper filters on em yet), and it really almost comes down to more of a matter of principle.
The difference is that Marijuana is mind altering to a level that makes them dysfunctional. Similar to Alcohol. Think about how much money is spent just trying to keep drunk drivers off the streets, now double it. It's potentially more cancerous that cigarettes (no one has any paper filters on em yet), and it really almost comes down to more of a matter of principle.
Reply
0
0
03-13-2009, 06:34 PM
#118
Right, and a delusional and paranoid mass public is totally what we need...
The difference is that Marijuana is mind altering to a level that makes them dysfunctional. Similar to Alcohol. Think about how much money is spent just trying to keep drunk drivers off the streets, now double it. It's potentially more cancerous that cigarettes (no one has any paper filters on em yet), and it really almost comes down to more of a matter of principle.
The difference is that Marijuana is mind altering to a level that makes them dysfunctional. Similar to Alcohol. Think about how much money is spent just trying to keep drunk drivers off the streets, now double it. It's potentially more cancerous that cigarettes (no one has any paper filters on em yet), and it really almost comes down to more of a matter of principle.
Reply
0
0
03-14-2009, 01:00 AM
#119
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
I'm a political schizo...
pro-choice, pro-gun, atheist (actually anti-religion), support the flat tax, I believe drug laws are too stiff and the rest are too soft, anti-earmark, I'm a tax and spend proponent for brick and mortar, and did I mention I'm not religious and believe that religion is a mental illness that should be treated with psychoactive medication?...and that leaves me with pretty much no party.
pro-choice, pro-gun, atheist (actually anti-religion), support the flat tax, I believe drug laws are too stiff and the rest are too soft, anti-earmark, I'm a tax and spend proponent for brick and mortar, and did I mention I'm not religious and believe that religion is a mental illness that should be treated with psychoactive medication?...and that leaves me with pretty much no party.
Reply
0
0
