The Random Pictures Thread. Only Rule: Post here more and entertain me. - Page 1210 - Miata Turbo Forum -Boost cars, acquire cats.

Welcome to Miataturbo.net   Members
 


Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2015, 08:42 AM   #24181
Boost Czar

iTrader: (60)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 70,179
Total Cats: 1,402
Default

click to play

Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 09:48 AM   #24182
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 24,679
Total Cats: 1,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
doesn't mean there was no plot, just means they were horrible movies.
I didn't say there was no plot, I said they were shitty movies. And furthermore, I'm ashamed that I didn't burn (with fire) my DVD copies of them before out 4 year old could discover them. He now prefers II and III to ESB and ROTJ, much to my horror.
Joe Perez is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 10:16 AM   #24183
Boost Czar

iTrader: (60)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 70,179
Total Cats: 1,402
Default

im still trying to figure out the thought process of introducing a Michelle Tanner character.
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 11:17 AM   #24184
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 24,679
Total Cats: 1,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
im still trying to figure out the thought process of introducing a Michelle Tanner character.
Dunno.

Is the Force strong with her?



Also, I finally figured out why the trailer touched a special place in my heart.


This:



= this:




That had to be done on purpose.


Attached Thumbnails
The Random Pictures Thread. Only Rule: Post here more and entertain me.-greatest-star-wars-characters-worst-0694eb25-d8e5-4cbf-8bfd-9128b07cf045.jpg   The Random Pictures Thread. Only Rule: Post here more and entertain me.-chewie-han-bike.jpg  
Joe Perez is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 11:25 AM   #24185
Boost Czar

iTrader: (60)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 70,179
Total Cats: 1,402
Default

you'd like this too:

Into the Great Unknown - Wookieepedia, the Star Wars Wiki
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 11:33 AM   #24186
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 24,679
Total Cats: 1,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
To be honest, I just don't "get" fan-fiction, be it Star Wars, Galactica, or Pony.

Unrelated:

Attached Thumbnails
The Random Pictures Thread. Only Rule: Post here more and entertain me.-demons.png  
Joe Perez is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 11:36 AM   #24187
Boost Czar

iTrader: (60)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 70,179
Total Cats: 1,402
Default

because it's cute and clever?

is episode 7 not fanfiction?
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 06:51 PM   #24188
Elite Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,189
Total Cats: 325
Default

Attached Thumbnails
The Random Pictures Thread. Only Rule: Post here more and entertain me.-mess.jpg  
rleete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 07:03 PM   #24189
Boost Czar

iTrader: (60)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 70,179
Total Cats: 1,402
Default

whom seems incorrect in this usage.

The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle.

the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he.


"I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont **** with me."

would be better.
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 07:18 PM   #24190
Elite Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,189
Total Cats: 325
Default

Did you go to Southern Illinois University by any chance?
rleete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 07:26 PM   #24191
Destroyer of Inconel
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In ur driveway, abusin' ur WPA
Posts: 8,764
Total Cats: 750
Default

Sky Pods Show Rise of New York Skyline - Video - NYTimes.com
EO2K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 07:54 PM   #24192
Crumple Zone Tester
iTrader: (6)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,490
Total Cats: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
whom seems incorrect in this usage.

The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle.

the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he.


"I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont **** with me."

would be better.
No, "whom" refers not to "I" (the cat) but to "someone".

Since the structure is "I am not someone," that means that "whom" is referring to the object of the sentence, and is therefore correct.
mgeoffriau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 08:14 PM   #24193
SadFab Sales Lady
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 14,842
Total Cats: 937
Default

aidandj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 08:45 PM   #24194
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 24,679
Total Cats: 1,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
whom seems incorrect in this usage.

The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle.

the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he.


"I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont **** with me."

would be better.

The cat is correct.

The cat is not someone with whom you should trifle.
Joe Perez is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 08:47 PM   #24195
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 24,679
Total Cats: 1,576
Default







Attached Thumbnails
The Random Pictures Thread. Only Rule: Post here more and entertain me.-truffe_noire_du_p%25c3%25a9rigord.jpg  
Joe Perez is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 09:02 PM   #24196
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,875
Total Cats: 486
Default

This is much cooler since the guy lands all over the place. Like on mountains and hills and ****.

triple88a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 09:05 PM   #24197
Boost Czar

iTrader: (60)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 70,179
Total Cats: 1,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgeoffriau View Post
No, "whom" refers not to "I" (the cat) but to "someone".

Since the structure is "I am not someone," that means that "whom" is referring to the object of the sentence, and is therefore correct.
yeah that makes sense.



dunce cap.


but I am someone who still thinks that I am correct.

Last edited by Braineack; 04-20-2015 at 09:44 PM.
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 09:42 PM   #24198
Elite Member
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 1,786
Total Cats: 159
Default

Well, it's actually the object of the preposition. "with", hence the objective case.

A reverse case is when you say something like, "He is cross with whoever gets in his way". In that case, "whoever gets" is a noun clause, in which, "whoever" is the subject, "gets" is the verb, respectively of that clause; so use the nominative case, "whoever" instead of "whomever". The clause is the object of the preposition "with" in that instance.
DNMakinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 10:33 PM   #24199
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,654
Total Cats: 209
Default

Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2015, 10:37 PM   #24200
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 24,679
Total Cats: 1,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie View Post
Little things like that are precisely why I have a sandbox VM.
Joe Perez is online now   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project Gemini - Turbo Civic on the Cheap Full_Tilt_Boogie Build Threads 53 12-07-2016 05:52 PM
1991 special edition with hard top full part out JC, NJ russian Miata parts for sale/trade 6 10-08-2015 04:01 PM
wiring wideband ground to battery terminal btabor ECUs and Tuning 10 09-28-2015 06:33 PM


Tags
bbbjtcws, fap damage critical, fapanoidus, fapanomanon, furious fap damage, joe perez, mlp porn, mods' asleep; post ponies, pirate treasure, redhead fine art, wetwork, where's my pants

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 PM.