Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

The AI-generated cat pictures thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2015, 07:42 AM
  #24181  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

click to play

Braineack is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 08:48 AM
  #24182  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
doesn't mean there was no plot, just means they were horrible movies.
I didn't say there was no plot, I said they were shitty movies. And furthermore, I'm ashamed that I didn't burn (with fire) my DVD copies of them before out 4 year old could discover them. He now prefers II and III to ESB and ROTJ, much to my horror.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 09:16 AM
  #24183  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

im still trying to figure out the thought process of introducing a Michelle Tanner character.
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 10:17 AM
  #24184  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
im still trying to figure out the thought process of introducing a Michelle Tanner character.
Dunno.

Is the Force strong with her?



Also, I finally figured out why the trailer touched a special place in my heart.


This:



= this:




That had to be done on purpose.


Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-greatest-star-wars-characters-worst-0694eb25-d8e5-4cbf-8bfd-9128b07cf045.jpg   The AI-generated cat pictures thread-chewie-han-bike.jpg  
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 10:25 AM
  #24185  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

you'd like this too:

Into the Great Unknown - Wookieepedia, the Star Wars Wiki
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 10:33 AM
  #24186  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
To be honest, I just don't "get" fan-fiction, be it Star Wars, Galactica, or Pony.

Unrelated:

Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-demons.png  
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 10:36 AM
  #24187  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

because it's cute and clever?

is episode 7 not fanfiction?
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 05:51 PM
  #24188  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,593
Total Cats: 1,259
Default

Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-mess.jpg  
rleete is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 06:03 PM
  #24189  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

whom seems incorrect in this usage.

The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle.

the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he.


"I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont **** with me."

would be better.
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 06:18 PM
  #24190  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,593
Total Cats: 1,259
Default

Did you go to Southern Illinois University by any chance?
rleete is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 06:26 PM
  #24191  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

Sky Pods Show Rise of New York Skyline - Video - NYTimes.com
EO2K is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 06:54 PM
  #24192  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
whom seems incorrect in this usage.

The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle.

the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he.


"I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont **** with me."

would be better.
No, "whom" refers not to "I" (the cat) but to "someone".

Since the structure is "I am not someone," that means that "whom" is referring to the object of the sentence, and is therefore correct.
mgeoffriau is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 07:14 PM
  #24193  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

aidandj is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 07:45 PM
  #24194  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
whom seems incorrect in this usage.

The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle.

the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he.


"I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont **** with me."

would be better.

The cat is correct.

The cat is not someone with whom you should trifle.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 07:47 PM
  #24195  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default







Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-truffe_noire_du_p%25c3%25a9rigord.jpg  
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 08:02 PM
  #24196  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

This is much cooler since the guy lands all over the place. Like on mountains and hills and ****.

triple88a is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 08:05 PM
  #24197  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
No, "whom" refers not to "I" (the cat) but to "someone".

Since the structure is "I am not someone," that means that "whom" is referring to the object of the sentence, and is therefore correct.
yeah that makes sense.



dunce cap.


but I am someone who still thinks that I am correct.

Last edited by Braineack; 04-20-2015 at 08:44 PM.
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 08:42 PM
  #24198  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 856
Default

Well, it's actually the object of the preposition. "with", hence the objective case.

A reverse case is when you say something like, "He is cross with whoever gets in his way". In that case, "whoever gets" is a noun clause, in which, "whoever" is the subject, "gets" is the verb, respectively of that clause; so use the nominative case, "whoever" instead of "whomever". The clause is the object of the preposition "with" in that instance.
DNMakinson is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 09:33 PM
  #24199  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Name:  15vKIcu.jpg
Views: 13
Size:  472.3 KB
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 09:37 PM
  #24200  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
Little things like that are precisely why I have a sandbox VM.
Joe Perez is offline  


Quick Reply: The AI-generated cat pictures thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.