Surface Pro for tuning?
#42
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,590
For a simple dedicated tuning machine, I am aware of no advantage offered by 7 or 8 over XP, especially if the machine is small enough not to benefit from a 64 bit OS.
#44
Windows XP support has ended - Microsoft Windows
#45
Thought I posted this earlier, but I guess I never hit post.
I recently started tuning on a Surface Pro 2 instead of a laptop, though I admittedly having been tuning for long, nor am by any means proficient. Once you get the font settings and theme set correctly in TunerStudio, changing settings etc. is perfectly easy, and causes me no problems. The times that I miss my laptop are almost entirely a result of the smaller screen. When using the offline VEAL, it is very difficult to see the cell change while in the car, like when you hover over a cell to see what it originated at. The 3D graphs also leave something to be desired when using.
Basically the way things go for me right now: On the surface I use VEAL, MLV Offline Analyzer, and make Setting changes. I keep my tune files in dropbox. When I get home, it uploads any logs I've taken, desktop downloads them, and then I use that to examine VE tables, 3D graphs, and other things that require more screen real estate.
Tl;Dr: Works just as well as a laptop, but has the grievances that accompany a small screen.
I recently started tuning on a Surface Pro 2 instead of a laptop, though I admittedly having been tuning for long, nor am by any means proficient. Once you get the font settings and theme set correctly in TunerStudio, changing settings etc. is perfectly easy, and causes me no problems. The times that I miss my laptop are almost entirely a result of the smaller screen. When using the offline VEAL, it is very difficult to see the cell change while in the car, like when you hover over a cell to see what it originated at. The 3D graphs also leave something to be desired when using.
Basically the way things go for me right now: On the surface I use VEAL, MLV Offline Analyzer, and make Setting changes. I keep my tune files in dropbox. When I get home, it uploads any logs I've taken, desktop downloads them, and then I use that to examine VE tables, 3D graphs, and other things that require more screen real estate.
Tl;Dr: Works just as well as a laptop, but has the grievances that accompany a small screen.
#46
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,176
Total Cats: 1,680
XP support ended in April which means no more security updates. If you're going to disable WiFi and never connect it to the internet then that's fine but you don't want to be running around with an infected tuning laptop to save a couple bucks. That already incredibly slow netbook will slow to a crawl as it gets infected over and over and over.
Windows XP support has ended - Microsoft Windows
Windows XP support has ended - Microsoft Windows
#47
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,590
I've somehow managed to make it nearly a full decade running a mishmash of Win2k and WinXP on my tuning machines, with Windows Update completely disabled and no third-party antivirus software running, without anything bad happening. When everyone started re-tweeting about how "MICROSOFT HAS DISCONTINUED UPDATES FOR XP!!!!one", my only reaction was "Huh, I didn't even realize they'd still been supporting it."
Now, if you happen to find a machine for $100-$150 that comes with 7 or 8, then great. I'm not poo-pooing either OS- they're just fine. All I'm saying is that if you find a killer deal on an XP machine, there is no reason at all why you should hesitate to buy it merely because "7 is better." For the purpose of tuning a Megasquirt, Windows 98SE would work just fine*.
* = I know that MegaTune will run under 98SE- the documentation for TunerStudio suggests that it may require XP at a minimum.
#48
In this case, "retarded" relative to personal computer security.
I have antivirus software installed on my home desktop and general use laptop. The primary purpose for having antivirus software installed is because other people use my PC. Unfortunately, efforts by Microsoft and other major software developers over the last decade have effectively dumbed the average computer user down. The "golden age" of mass computer user knowlege was probably circa 2000. In those years, you had to actually have a pretty good clue as to what you were doing in order to use a computer. Since then, software has been "easy mode", then "super easy mode", then "so easy a caveman can do it", to now "so easy a mac user / 4-year-old can do it" It just doesn't require any intelligence at all to go online, download some malware, enter your credit card number, address, phone number, social security number, email address, email password, and everything else about you, and then press the "deliver to criminal organization" button at the bottom of the page.
Example: my fiancee works in IT dealing with infrastructure, enterprise and cloud security, BYOD, etc., so I would not really call her a retard with regard to computers - but on Friday of last week she got home from work several hours before I did, and decided she wanted to download a Youtube -> MP3 converter program. (Joe already knows where this is going.) She obviously blew right through all of the installation prompts (Next, Next, Next, I Agree, Next, Install, Finish.) And succeeded in installing her Youtube -> MP3 converter. I have no idea if it actually worked for her - I didn't ask. Experience tells me that it most likely did not work for her, nor did it provide any functionality beyond frustration for her. Several hours later, when I got home from work, ready to enjoy my Labor Day weekend and opened chrome, I let out a loud and angry "****!" upon noticing that my browser homepage had been hijacked. I immediately asked her "what did you download?" Asking her "did you download something?" would have been redundant.
"Don't we have computer virus software installed?"
"Yes, it is great at protecting against computer viruses, but it doesn't protect against stupid."
(I didn't actually say that, but that's what I was thinking. My quote is below.)
"Yes, but if you tell the computer that you want to install a program that happens to do bad things, what's the antivirus supposed to do about it? You told it to install."
Thus began two days of malware removal processes - so much for that enjoyable 3-day weekend. She is apparently great at protecting enterprise networks and proprietary information, but is a complete retard when it comes to personal computer security.
Physical home security is another thing I'm working with her on, progress is slow but good.
#49
For untrusted software, virtual machines are great. These days it's easy to make a small VM, throw on junk apps, and not worry about your real machine being compromised.
Ultimately people still need to know what they're doing.
For a dedicated tuning laptop, it doesn't hold anything critical so who cares if it gets hacked. But in general it's better to VM an older OS like WinXP for tuning software that can't run on newer versions. Nobody can guard against remote exploits, and I'm sure WinXP has some good ones left in it.
Last edited by arrgh; 09-03-2014 at 03:39 PM.
#50
I'll be blunt, if you can't manage to prevent your tuning laptop from being infected with a virus / malware / whatever in the absence of Windows updates, then you're a retard. It involves running TunerStudio and Dropbox, and occasionally connecting to either MiataTurbo.net or MSExtra.com to check some documentation.
You might be surprised at the content served up by ad servers by malicious advertisers and the ad servers weak security. Legit sites can and do serve up malware through advertisers from time to time.
Wordpress has an incredibly poor track record and is often deployed by those not familiar with running publicly exposed services and don't know that it is essential to subscribe to security notices and stay up to date on patches. That link you just clicked from MT or MSExtra to some random guys blog that was just owned yesterday? Yeah it's serving up malware.
Connect to your buddies WiFi to share maps? Guess what, one of his machines is owned and now your tuning laptop is too.
I've somehow managed to make it nearly a full decade running a mishmash of Win2k and WinXP on my tuning machines, with Windows Update completely disabled and no third-party antivirus software running, without anything bad happening.
When everyone started re-tweeting about how "MICROSOFT HAS DISCONTINUED UPDATES FOR XP!!!!one", my only reaction was "Huh, I didn't even realize they'd still been supporting it."
Now, if you happen to find a machine for $100-$150 that comes with 7 or 8, then great. I'm not poo-pooing either OS- they're just fine. All I'm saying is that if you find a killer deal on an XP machine, there is no reason at all why you should hesitate to buy it merely because "7 is better." For the purpose of tuning a Megasquirt, Windows 98SE would work just fine*.
* = I know that MegaTune will run under 98SE- the documentation for TunerStudio suggests that it may require XP at a minimum.
#51
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,590
For a dedicated tuning laptop, it doesn't hold anything critical so who cares if it gets hacked. But in general it's better to VM an older OS like WinXP for tuning software that can't run on newer versions. Nobody can guard against remote exploits, and I'm sure WinXP has some good ones left in it.
#52
Example: ...
Doesn't matter how safe / smart you are. **** happens. Sure would suck to lose a bunch of tunes and log files over a mistake though.
#53
Let's keep this thread on topic here please.
Good to know. Thanks for your input. I kind of do the same currently as well. Everything just syncs with google drive so I can do my logging and autotuning on the go but do actual troubleshooting and manual tweaking on my desktop when I get home. The surface seems ideal for that type of setup.
Thought I posted this earlier, but I guess I never hit post.
I recently started tuning on a Surface Pro 2 instead of a laptop, though I admittedly having been tuning for long, nor am by any means proficient. Once you get the font settings and theme set correctly in TunerStudio, changing settings etc. is perfectly easy, and causes me no problems. The times that I miss my laptop are almost entirely a result of the smaller screen. When using the offline VEAL, it is very difficult to see the cell change while in the car, like when you hover over a cell to see what it originated at. The 3D graphs also leave something to be desired when using.
Basically the way things go for me right now: On the surface I use VEAL, MLV Offline Analyzer, and make Setting changes. I keep my tune files in dropbox. When I get home, it uploads any logs I've taken, desktop downloads them, and then I use that to examine VE tables, 3D graphs, and other things that require more screen real estate.
Tl;Dr: Works just as well as a laptop, but has the grievances that accompany a small screen.
I recently started tuning on a Surface Pro 2 instead of a laptop, though I admittedly having been tuning for long, nor am by any means proficient. Once you get the font settings and theme set correctly in TunerStudio, changing settings etc. is perfectly easy, and causes me no problems. The times that I miss my laptop are almost entirely a result of the smaller screen. When using the offline VEAL, it is very difficult to see the cell change while in the car, like when you hover over a cell to see what it originated at. The 3D graphs also leave something to be desired when using.
Basically the way things go for me right now: On the surface I use VEAL, MLV Offline Analyzer, and make Setting changes. I keep my tune files in dropbox. When I get home, it uploads any logs I've taken, desktop downloads them, and then I use that to examine VE tables, 3D graphs, and other things that require more screen real estate.
Tl;Dr: Works just as well as a laptop, but has the grievances that accompany a small screen.
#54
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Dont do that on your tuning laptop. Problem solved.
Who downloads **** anyway?
Imbedded player + adblock + not clicking on anything = boner time - computer aids
If you need a PDF reader and google it, click the first link, and start hammering on big "DOWNLOAD HERE" buttons, then you should not use XP.
No pro hacker is going to waste his kung fu trying to break into your PC directly. You get viruses from downloading them and you get "hacked" by letting yourself get phished.
My idea of a perfect tuning laptop is an old toughbook of thinkpad with XP on it.
Who downloads **** anyway?
Imbedded player + adblock + not clicking on anything = boner time - computer aids
If you need a PDF reader and google it, click the first link, and start hammering on big "DOWNLOAD HERE" buttons, then you should not use XP.
No pro hacker is going to waste his kung fu trying to break into your PC directly. You get viruses from downloading them and you get "hacked" by letting yourself get phished.
My idea of a perfect tuning laptop is an old toughbook of thinkpad with XP on it.
#55
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,590
I am going to append my previous advice. While I still support the use of old Asus EeePCs of the 900/1000 series, it turns out that it is possible to install Windows onto some Chromebooks as well, such as:
Acer 11.6 C7 Chromebook 2GB 16GB Chrome OS| C710-2856 | Refurbished (NU.SH7AA.016) at TigerDirect.com
While I have no personal experience with this unit, the Celeron 847 in it does outperform the lower-tier Atoms (so that Erat can surf for **** while he tunes), it has a 1366 x 768 display (so that Leafy can run crappy tuning software on it without having to suffer the indignity of scrolling) and it can run Win 7 (so that midpack can have a false sense of security while he accidentally installs malware onto it.)
For $160 refurbed, this particular unit would be competitive against an Eee, and at 11.6", it's on the larger end of "small enough to comfortably use in a Miata."
Acer 11.6 C7 Chromebook 2GB 16GB Chrome OS| C710-2856 | Refurbished (NU.SH7AA.016) at TigerDirect.com
While I have no personal experience with this unit, the Celeron 847 in it does outperform the lower-tier Atoms (so that Erat can surf for **** while he tunes), it has a 1366 x 768 display (so that Leafy can run crappy tuning software on it without having to suffer the indignity of scrolling) and it can run Win 7 (so that midpack can have a false sense of security while he accidentally installs malware onto it.)
For $160 refurbed, this particular unit would be competitive against an Eee, and at 11.6", it's on the larger end of "small enough to comfortably use in a Miata."
#60
I am going to append my previous advice. While I still support the use of old Asus EeePCs of the 900/1000 series, it turns out that it is possible to install Windows onto some Chromebooks as well, such as:
Acer 11.6 C7 Chromebook 2GB 16GB Chrome OS| C710-2856 | Refurbished (NU.SH7AA.016) at TigerDirect.com
Natively Running Windows 7 on Acer C7 Chromebook - YouTube
While I have no personal experience with this unit, the Celeron 847 in it does outperform the lower-tier Atoms (so that Erat can surf for **** while he tunes), it has a 1366 x 768 display (so that Leafy can run crappy tuning software on it without having to suffer the indignity of scrolling) and it can run Win 7 (so that midpack can have a false sense of security while he accidentally installs malware onto it.)
For $160 refurbed, this particular unit would be competitive against an Eee, and at 11.6", it's on the larger end of "small enough to comfortably use in a Miata."
Acer 11.6 C7 Chromebook 2GB 16GB Chrome OS| C710-2856 | Refurbished (NU.SH7AA.016) at TigerDirect.com
Natively Running Windows 7 on Acer C7 Chromebook - YouTube
While I have no personal experience with this unit, the Celeron 847 in it does outperform the lower-tier Atoms (so that Erat can surf for **** while he tunes), it has a 1366 x 768 display (so that Leafy can run crappy tuning software on it without having to suffer the indignity of scrolling) and it can run Win 7 (so that midpack can have a false sense of security while he accidentally installs malware onto it.)
For $160 refurbed, this particular unit would be competitive against an Eee, and at 11.6", it's on the larger end of "small enough to comfortably use in a Miata."
What would you do about hard drive space? W7 alone takes more than 16gig in my experience. Just take it apart and dump a bigger drive in it?
Oof, nevermind... watched the video. That looks scary!
How well does Tunerstudio and stuff play with Linux and/or will a serial Windows user like myself be able to even use Linux without feeling incredibly stupid?