Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

New Merc AMG: 2.0L, 26 psi, 355 hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2013, 11:44 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default New Merc AMG: 2.0L, 26 psi, 355 hp

I wonder what its torque curve will look like.

Winding Road | Review: Mercedes-Benz CLA45 AMG
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 11:45 PM
  #2  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

A luxurious evo? Nice
18psi is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 12:28 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
elesjuan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
Default

Kinda sexy..



Gets no love from me, no manual gearbox.
Attached Thumbnails New Merc AMG: 2.0L, 26 psi, 355 hp-2014-cla45-amg-1.jpg  
elesjuan is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 09:24 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thenuge26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
Default

Even if I'll never even think about buying one, more 4-cylinder turbos are always a good thing.

More factory turbos = more turbo R&D = better turbos. Everybody wins!
thenuge26 is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 10:24 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

Only available with 2 pedals and it spends most of its life in front-wheel drive?

Originally Posted by Mercedes press release
Torque split is fully variable: in normal driving, the CLA45 AMG has front-wheel drive bias in the interests of optimum efficiency. If the driving dynamics require, the variable AMG 4MATIC all-wheel drive splits the torque between front and rear axle at a ratio of up to 50 : 50 percent. The variables influencing the torque split ratio are vehicle speed, lateral and longitudinal acceleration, steering angle, speed difference between the individual wheels, selected gear and accelerator position.
I'll pass.

I am curious to see how the power delivery is with that much HP and torques and only 2.0L.
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 11:08 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
2ndGearRubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,163
Total Cats: 12
Default

Torque curve will be the following: 4000rpm - noneofit / 4500rpm - allofit
2ndGearRubber is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 11:15 AM
  #7  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Well if they're running 26psi that suggests the turbo isn't going to be all that big. And since its a benz I'd be surprised if it wasn't something twin scroll. So there is hope for it yet.

But its still a 50+k sedan. Most of us can't afford it lol. Who cares
18psi is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 11:57 AM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thenuge26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
Default

It is twin scroll according to the press release.

2.0L + twin scroll + EFR-like turbo = winning. I'm thinking it's probably 6258-sized if it's making 350hp@26PSI.
thenuge26 is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 12:19 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
It is twin scroll according to the press release.

2.0L + twin scroll + EFR-like turbo = winning. I'm thinking it's probably 6258-sized if it's making 350hp@26PSI.
Probably much smaller. Remember this is a larger engine with a head that flows much better than ours and you can make that much at the wheels with a 6258 on our engines at 26psi.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 12:21 PM
  #10  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Yeah but take into account all the OEM intake/exhaust parts choking it down.

Or so I'm guessing.
18psi is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 12:29 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Good point. I did not even think about that aspect.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:03 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by elesjuan
Gets no love from me, no manual gearbox.
PDK and DCT > three pedals.

All day everyday.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:12 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
TheScaryOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 592
Total Cats: 47
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
PDK and DCT > three pedals.

All day (Except for the hours of 7 AM to 10 AM, and 4 PM to 7 PM) everyday (Except for days that end in Y).
FTFY

But seriously. On the track? Awesome. On a long windy road? Awesome. Doing 3 MPH on the freeway in bumper to bumper traffic?
TheScaryOne is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:17 PM
  #14  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

you'd rather have a manual in 3mph bumper-to-bumper?
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:27 PM
  #15  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by TheScaryOne
FTFY

But seriously. On the track? Awesome. On a long windy road? Awesome. Doing 3 MPH on the freeway in bumper to bumper traffic?
pretty sure you misread his statement.....
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:31 PM
  #16  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

Objectively and from a purely rational perspective, I can't argue that a PDK is superior to a 3-pedal gearbox on a racetrack. However, a car like the AMG CLA (or my M3) is going to spend somewhere between 0% and 1% of its lifetime on a racetrack. My preference will always be a 3-pedal gearbox for subjective reasons.


After all, car purchases and ownership are almost never purely rational and objective or we would all be driving Pontiac Vibes and Honda Fits.
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:35 PM
  #17  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
After all, car purchases and ownership are almost never purely rational and objective or we would all be driving Pontiac Vibes and Honda Fits.
While I agree with the bolded part I do not necessarily agree with the second part. I think accounting for how much fun your car will be and how much it will make you smile is perfectly rational and objective. Happiness is the ultimate utility and should be considered in respect to every decision we make. However, you need to consider not just immediate satisfaction but the satisfaction over the entire life of the purchase/decision.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:36 PM
  #18  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by TheScaryOne
FTFY

But seriously. On the track? Awesome. On a long windy road? Awesome. Doing 3 MPH on the freeway in bumper to bumper traffic?
Originally Posted by Braineack
you'd rather have a manual in 3mph bumper-to-bumper?
Hahaha, perfect.

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
pretty sure you misread his statement.....
It appears that way.

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
Objectively and from a purely rational perspective, I can't argue that a PDK is superior to a 3-pedal gearbox on a racetrack. However, a car like the AMG CLA (or my M3) is going to spend somewhere between 0% and 1% of its lifetime on a racetrack. My preference will always be a 3-pedal gearbox for subjective reasons.


After all, car purchases and ownership are almost never purely rational and objective or we would all be driving Pontiac Vibes and Honda Fits.
I don't know, I got to spend quite a bit of time driving my buddies '10 M3 with the DCT box..........I thought it was fantastic. If I were in the market to drop that kind of coin, even on a car that would be 99% DD, I'd still go for the DCT.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:46 PM
  #19  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
Probably much smaller. Remember this is a larger engine with a head that flows much better than ours and you can make that much at the wheels with a 6258 on our engines at 26psi.
Remember, a turbo doesn't know what size an engine is. It only cares about flow and pressure ratio. 26 psi means a very high pressure ratio. The higher the pressure ratio, the later a turbo tends to make full boost.

I want to see the RPM it makes 80% of max torque.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:51 PM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Remember, a turbo doesn't know what size an engine is. It only cares about flow and pressure ratio. 26 psi means a very high pressure ratio. The higher the pressure ratio, the later a turbo tends to make full boost.

I want to see the RPM it makes 80% of max torque.
I understand that but a larger engine that is atleast of the same efficeincy of a smaller engine will make more power at the same psi on an identical turbo. That was my point.
Ryan_G is offline  


Quick Reply: New Merc AMG: 2.0L, 26 psi, 355 hp



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 AM.