CR-Z: Another fail Honda
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
CR-Z: Another fail Honda
The CR-Z was supposed to be the new CRX; small, lightweight, cheap, great handling. What a colossal failure this thing appears to be. 122hp, 2725lbs and it even gets the same gas mileage my 1985 CRX Si use to get, what amazing progress they've made in the past 25 years.
2011 Honda CR-Z First Drive
2011 Honda CR-Z First Drive
This Fit-based 1.5 is no sports-car engine and starts to get loud at around 5,000 rpm. Keep the hammer down and all too soon you find the engine stuttering as it hits the ignition cutout at 6,500 rpm. Worked hard, the engine sounds flat and hard — not exciting at all. And when you're on the limit rather than just pushing along, the CR-Z gives in to soggy, plowing understeer, and the body rolls over in distress. And a few hot runs up and down the hills soon had the brakes smoking. Yikes.
#4
I'll agree that it is not completely in the spirit of the original car, but the fact is that they can not make those cars anymore because your government has passed safety laws that would make it illegal. On your original points above though, I think you are retarded.
#6
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
You're right, its a total disappointment that they have managed to get the same MPG in a car that weighs almost 800lbs more and makes 2x as much power. They must be retarded.....
I'll agree that it is not completely in the spirit of the original car, but the fact is that they can not make those cars anymore because your government has passed safety laws that would make it illegal. On your original points above though, I think you are retarded.
I'll agree that it is not completely in the spirit of the original car, but the fact is that they can not make those cars anymore because your government has passed safety laws that would make it illegal. On your original points above though, I think you are retarded.
#8
I agree the car is huge amounts of fail. Looks like no fun what so ever. TDI's get better mileage and are probably more fun. I'll take my 25/34 and still have fun. If this car does come out, i really don't think any one would buy it. I would be much more excited if it didn't have that electro garbage on it. My wifes 08 civic gets about 40mpg on the interstate and 28-30 in town. (30 is her driving). I think the 1.8 vtecs like my wifes car has make 140 hp too. So compared to cars made 3 years before this by the same company? Epic fail.
#12
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
I just think it looks terrible.
All of my honda hatred aside, 9/10 cars they offer look like total ****.
I would sex0r the **** out of a new TL-S, or even just a TL.. Those things are HOT! To be quite honest I'd even drive an RSX if it were RWD. Hell I'd even daily drive a 5th Gen Prelude, ESPECIALLY if RWD!
Just looking at their cars driving down the street.. The pilot used to be okay looking then they boxed it off and just looks like an ulgy ******* turd.
When someone posted the published specs of the japan version CR-Z it didn't look too bad.. The specs, the car always looked like garbage... But seeing the actual specs for the USDM, Pass.
All of my honda hatred aside, 9/10 cars they offer look like total ****.
I would sex0r the **** out of a new TL-S, or even just a TL.. Those things are HOT! To be quite honest I'd even drive an RSX if it were RWD. Hell I'd even daily drive a 5th Gen Prelude, ESPECIALLY if RWD!
Just looking at their cars driving down the street.. The pilot used to be okay looking then they boxed it off and just looks like an ulgy ******* turd.
When someone posted the published specs of the japan version CR-Z it didn't look too bad.. The specs, the car always looked like garbage... But seeing the actual specs for the USDM, Pass.
#13
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
Oh hey, lets compare a car to like 50 other cars to find all its faults compared to those 50 cars. Then lets completely forget about our original post about comparing it to the original car that it resembles in spirit. This will really keep with the premise of the thread.
#14
I'm not defending the car, just pointing out that the current logic behind the posted argument is fully retarded. If what you stated is in fact his position then he needs to articulate that. It is not apparent in his OP.
I own a 89 CRX HF currently myself and I <3 it. I think the CRZ is an abomination. But I also feel dumber after having read this thread so, rightly, I'm a little annoyed.
I own a 89 CRX HF currently myself and I <3 it. I think the CRZ is an abomination. But I also feel dumber after having read this thread so, rightly, I'm a little annoyed.
#15
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
Oh hey, lets compare a car to like 50 other cars to find all its faults compared to those 50 cars. Then lets completely forget about our original post about comparing it to the original car that it resembles in spirit. This will really keep with the premise of the thread.
I was actually excited about this car coming out. I've always owned hondas before and was thinking this would probably be my next car. Unfortuantely it didn't measure up to any of my personal expectations. If you like it, great, maybe they will sell some afterall.
#18
The friggin US govt. won't let us have fun cars like the original CRX. Now we have to have crumple zones, 18 air bags and all the other BS that makes cars heavy. Look at how tiny the CRX really was. There is nothing like that available. CRX's and our Miatas make the new "Mini" cooper look like a box truck. My 94 Saturn Wagon was rated for the same EPA mileage as that CRZ.
I want a truly light, tiny and yes, underpowered car! I love driving a car with no hp but likes to rev and handle. You can have fun pushing it's limits on public roads without other drivers or the cops knowing or caring.
The euro's get all sorts of fun little cars that either won't meet our standards or that car makers believe wouldn't sell to us fat Americans.
I want a truly light, tiny and yes, underpowered car! I love driving a car with no hp but likes to rev and handle. You can have fun pushing it's limits on public roads without other drivers or the cops knowing or caring.
The euro's get all sorts of fun little cars that either won't meet our standards or that car makers believe wouldn't sell to us fat Americans.
#19
I had one of the very first '86 Integras...and man was that car FUN!
You could push it on any road, without being too crazy. The best part was all the performance envelopes matched. You ran out of brakes, suspension and power all at the same time. Great visibility, lovely gear box and willing motor.
Those had the DOHC version of the D16, and mine looked brand new internally at 140K miles. Brakes were 4 wheel discs, uncommon at the time. Everything on that car still worked even though it was almost 20yrs old.
I really wish they still could make cars like that.