thenuge26

iTrader: (2)

Hey, I am a 26 year old software developer currently living in Indy.

I have a red 99 5MT with an open diff (that will change eventually) that is pretty much stock (I put in a WOLO air horn).

I am lucky enough to say that my first 2 cars I ever owned were FI, the first being a 98 Grand Prix GTP and the second a 02 Audi A6 w/ 2.7TT. Despite being N/A, the miata is by far the most fun of the three. Eventually, I will want to change that.

I was pretty set on getting an FFS SC, since I am really just looking for the flattest torque curve you can get, but it hasn't happened yet so you still have time.

If I have somewhere to work on the car this winter, I will definitely be putting on the FM VMaxx kit (taking suggestions as to which one to get). I know I want something pretty adjustable, as I think I have learned a decent amount of car setup from gaming (specifically Live For Speed), but I am unsure of how much adjustment I really need. But if I had a place, I might do both the coilovers and a SC/turbo.

I am not looking for a track monster, this will be purely for street and maybe a few autocrosses (and maybe a track day or 2 eventually). But easy (and fun) driving on the street is much more important to me than getting 400ft-lbs 5 RPM before the redline.

Thanks for reading, and commence the berating for mentioning I want a supercharger

Edit: Oh yeah, pictures. I only have one decent one, but it is already on my credit card:


We will keep it low-quality so you can't see that she needs new paint

Miater

Welcome .

blaen99

iTrader: (6)

Welcome, but keep away from the FFS SC. Keep far away from it.

rleete

iTrader: (21)

You two aren't very good at reading thread titles.


Oh.


Damn!

pusha

iTrader: (5)

Don't buy an FFS kit.

hochkis

+1

pusha

iTrader: (5)

If you buy that FFS kit after reading even a single thread on this forum, you are more retarded than the kraut who thought tucking those tiny K03s way up close to a 2.7t before shoehorning it into the B5 was a good idea.

pusha

iTrader: (5)

And yes, I had k16 Buehn Bombs in my S4.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

why a flat torque curve?

pdexta

iTrader: (17)

The tq curve on a stock car is pretty flat. If that's your goal, I don't see any need to waste any extra money.

thenuge26

iTrader: (2)

If I was happy with the stock torque, would I have registered on miataturbo.net

I love this car, but it is still the slowest car I have ever owned, and I plan to change that. If I had the time/knowhow/money, I would just pull the 4.6L from my MkVIII and shove it in there. But since I am new to the car modification world, I figure a turbo would be a bit more cost effective. Can I still get one even if I don't need a 350HP fully built track beast?

One serious question I need answered is how much of the work can I expect to do myself? I understand a lot about how everything works, I just have basically no experience working on cars. I helped my roommate take his transmission out of his '95M last year and put it back after it was rebuilt. Am I crazy thinking that I could do some of this myself (with the help of a neighbor who works on all his cars but probably has little experience with turbos)? Or should I plan on professional installation from the start? And what will that cost me?

Thanks for your help already.

pusha

iTrader: (5)

With the help of this forum, you can do everything yourself. I don't think you fully appreciate the resource you've tapped into.

thenuge26

iTrader: (2)

That's what I like to hear!

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

flat torque engaged:

olderguy

iTrader: (19)

The Machine lives on.......

thenuge26

iTrader: (2)

lol@260ft-lbs of tq. That's more than the A6 had.

You guys win. I have always liked turbos better than SCs, but I thought that an SC would be better for the street and a turbo better for the track. But between that and reading this thread, I am starting to think a GT2560 might be a better idea.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

the above plot is a 2560 on a 99 motor (car weighed less than 2000lbs). Of course, coupled with good manifolds, but easy to recreate none-the-less.

olderguy

iTrader: (19)

If I remember correctly(and I am old), it was a '99 head and gutted intake on an earlier bottom end(maybe '94) which gave it a pretty low compression ratio which nobody I know of has yet to calculate.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

i thought it was was on his 99 block. unless that was after he blew it? i know he kept his underdrive pulley on it which is a no-no and it blew up at one point.

or was that just his 270rwhp pull, before the BEGi IM?

phillyb

iTrader: (8)

don't stare at the sun
don't stare at the sun
don't stare at the sun
don't stare at the sun
don't stare at the sun
don't stare at the sun
don't stare at the sun

stare at the sun