Hey guys
04-23-2010, 09:37 AM
#22
your car should easily do 140
it just wont do it in MPH
That '94 will do 118mph WOT on a good day going downhill with a tailwind topless - you MIGHT get to 125 with the HT. Thats BEFORE you increased the aerodynamic cross section of the car by installing the body kit.
Any post you make on this forum is null and void until you openly admit that you didn't do 138mph in that car. Short of dropping it out of an airplane or off a cliff IT DIDN'T HAPPEN
it just wont do it in MPH
That '94 will do 118mph WOT on a good day going downhill with a tailwind topless - you MIGHT get to 125 with the HT. Thats BEFORE you increased the aerodynamic cross section of the car by installing the body kit.
Any post you make on this forum is null and void until you openly admit that you didn't do 138mph in that car. Short of dropping it out of an airplane or off a cliff IT DIDN'T HAPPEN
Reply
0
0
04-23-2010, 10:42 AM
#27
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,645
Total Cats: 3,009
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner. A 100whp car will not respond favorably to the addition of 3 square feet of frontal area and an increased coefficient of drag. But then again, all high school kids believe that any car should automatically be able to go as fast as the top number on the speedometer, or did you already know that?
Reply
0
0
04-23-2010, 04:17 PM
#35
Newb
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 19
Total Cats: 0
I imagine it was in the 135-140 range. Highway driving and playing around with a mazdaspeed 3 it took a while to get there. My weight might have something to do with it as well.. I only weigh 140. Also I removed the AC/ + the soft top and the soft top framing so who knows how much weight that was.
My question is why should I stay here? Barely any of you have any respect for the work I have done to my car and all you can do is be negative with the train.
My question is why should I stay here? Barely any of you have any respect for the work I have done to my car and all you can do is be negative with the train.
Reply
0
0
04-23-2010, 04:27 PM
#37
I imagine it was in the 135-140 range. Highway driving and playing around with a mazdaspeed 3 it took a while to get there. My weight might have something to do with it as well.. I only weigh 140. Also I removed the AC/ + the soft top and the soft top framing so who knows how much weight that was.
My question is why should I stay here? Barely any of you have any respect for the work I have done to my car and all you can do is be negative with the train.
My question is why should I stay here? Barely any of you have any respect for the work I have done to my car and all you can do is be negative with the train.
We would respect your work if you werent so full of ****. You will definetely feel better in CR.net where everything is mad JdM tIgTh Yo!!!!!
Reply
0
0
04-23-2010, 04:30 PM
#38
Newb
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 19
Total Cats: 0
Where the **** are you pulling this jdm bullshit, do people just make **** up out of thin air? I dont care if you beleive what I say, I know what my speed was at that time and I never claimed to have won againts a ms3.
Half of you ******* morons prolly skipped past the intro post and jumped on the bandwagon with absolute no clue or any merit to that of which I said in my introduction.
Board is full of minorities...
Half of you ******* morons prolly skipped past the intro post and jumped on the bandwagon with absolute no clue or any merit to that of which I said in my introduction.
Board is full of minorities...
Reply
0
0
