Meet and Greet Say Hi. De-noob yourself.

Noob that is beginning aspiration conversion.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2013, 08:14 AM
  #41  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

So far manifold options for that sucker are few. Very few.
18psi is offline  
Old 05-22-2013, 11:52 AM
  #42  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Welcome danduv, to the best site on the net!
sixshooter is offline  
Old 05-22-2013, 12:39 PM
  #43  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

If you want a ramhorn style manifold that will work with an EFR and retain AC/PS talk to abe at ARTech. I know he has a top mount that will work and I am fairly positive he has a bottom mount that will work too. I know I asked him about it in another thread and he said he would have to test it with an EFR to make sure but he said it should work.

FrankB is also putting an EFR on his stock motor and he went out and got the low boost wastegate which is 6psi, I believe, to be sure he did not vent the block. I for one say buy once. Always try to modify with your absolute end goal in mind so you don't have to redo your setup every time you get the itch for more power.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 05-22-2013, 10:16 PM
  #44  
Newb
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
danduv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -5
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
If you want a ramhorn style manifold that will work with an EFR and retain AC/PS talk to abe at ARTech. I know he has a top mount that will work and I am fairly positive he has a bottom mount that will work too. I know I asked him about it in another thread and he said he would have to test it with an EFR to make sure but he said it should work.

FrankB is also putting an EFR on his stock motor and he went out and got the low boost wastegate which is 6psi, I believe, to be sure he did not vent the block. I for one say buy once. Always try to modify with your absolute end goal in mind so you don't have to redo your setup every time you get the itch for more power.
Exactly what I was thinking.

Any benefits to top or bottom mount? I think I am going this route.
danduv is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 09:53 AM
  #45  
Junior Member
 
charchri4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 79
Total Cats: 2
Default

I don't know what any of these acronyms mean - log mani, MS, fmic, etc – but I have enjoyed reading this thread very much. I find it amusing that this turbo thing has a complete language all its own and I am glad you guys know what it is!

I’m a bit on the old school side and never got past V8…
charchri4 is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 11:21 AM
  #46  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Fireindc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Taos, New mexico
Posts: 6,603
Total Cats: 564
Default

Originally Posted by charchri4
I don't know what any of these acronyms mean - log mani, MS, fmic, etc – but I have enjoyed reading this thread very much. I find it amusing that this turbo thing has a complete language all its own and I am glad you guys know what it is!

I’m a bit on the old school side and never got past V8…
log mani = cast turbo manifold, ms = megasquirt, fmic = front mount intercooler.

I looked through your build, looks good man.
Fireindc is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 11:33 AM
  #47  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by danduv
Exactly what I was thinking.

Any benefits to top or bottom mount? I think I am going this route.
Bottom mounts are better for flow because of the downpipe path not having so many hard bends. The packaging for bottom mounts usually makes retaining AC/PS very difficult. They are also harder to work on.

Top mount manifolds sacrifice optimal flow for ease of packaging and maintenance. The turbo is very easy to get to in the engine bay and is clear from the AC/PS. This also places the turbo near some items in the engine bay that need to be protected from the heat including but not limited to the dipstick, fluid lines/resevoirs, etc.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 11:52 AM
  #48  
Newb
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
danduv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -5
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
Bottom mounts are better for flow because of the downpipe path not having so many hard bends. The packaging for bottom mounts usually makes retaining AC/PS very difficult. They are also harder to work on.

Top mount manifolds sacrifice optimal flow for ease of packaging and maintenance. The turbo is very easy to get to in the engine bay and is clear from the AC/PS. This also places the turbo near some items in the engine bay that need to be protected from the heat including but not limited to the dipstick, fluid lines/resevoirs, etc.
Generally speaking, would it to safe to say a good top mount would still flow better than log?
danduv is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 11:56 AM
  #49  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

For sure. Leaps and bounds better. They still flow very well, it is just not as optimal as a bottom mount. Most people around here with ramhorn manifolds run top mount for ease of packaging and access.
Ryan_G is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LucaCarMods
Build Threads
11
02-14-2016 06:13 AM
interestedofold
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
09-29-2015 01:42 PM
asmasm
MEGAsquirt
21
09-23-2015 10:53 AM
Squiblez
Meet and Greet
1
09-23-2015 01:50 AM
shanesauce
General Miata Chat
1
09-06-2015 08:47 PM



Quick Reply: Noob that is beginning aspiration conversion.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.