MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Calling all MS gurus - scooter EFI conversion help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2013, 04:48 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
JustinHoMi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hillsborough, NC
Posts: 273
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by curly
It's not, you yourself said you were off. Big difference between 11:1 and 14.6:1. NB doesn't know this difference.
The NB doesn't know the difference, but the math works. Like was mentioned before, if you tune for 14.7, then you can do the math to hit your target rpm. This is how I tune on the dyno too, and it works. To make it even easier, MLV and Autotune do the math for you! No, it won't be perfect, but you can get very acceptable results.

For instance, if you tune for 14.7, and you want to take a cell (or range) to 12.5 AFR, then you just need to calculate the multiplier:

14.7 / 12.5 = 1.176

Now multiply the cell(s) by 1.176, and you'll be at about 12.5 AFR.

Last edited by JustinHoMi; 04-10-2013 at 05:11 PM.
JustinHoMi is offline  
Old 04-10-2013, 05:10 PM
  #22  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
richyvrlimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Warrington/Birmingham
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
Default

Originally Posted by JustinHoMi
The NB doesn't know the difference, but the math works. Like was mentioned before, if you tune for 14.7, then you can do the math to hit your target rpm. This is how I tune on the dyno too, and it works. To make it even easier, MLV and Autotune do the math for you! No, it won't be perfect, but you can get very acceptable results.

For instance, if you tune for 14.7, and you want to take a cell (or range) to 12.5 AFR, then you just need to calculate the multiplier:

14.7 / 12.5 = 1.176

Now multiple the cell(s) by 1.176, and you'll be at about 12.5 AFR.
I have to concur, I've tuned with a NB sensor, albeit on an n/a car.

It's a complete ball ache and takes way longer, but you can achieve a satisapfactory tune.

Mine too concurred once id installed a wideband. I think I did it the same method as yourself, with MLV.

Using brains suggestion of ncorporate AFR and tuning everything to stoich then adjust the targets to what you want is also sound advice as long as the engine is n/a IMO.
richyvrlimited is offline  
Old 04-10-2013, 05:12 PM
  #23  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

yep, it's simple math at that point.
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-10-2013, 05:55 PM
  #24  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,976
Total Cats: 355
Default

Maybe I am on a wrong forum.

Do people on this forum actually tell others to do power runs aiming for 14.7 so that they can then do the math? And how do you verify that your tune is actually ok?

Is that you John Wayne? Is this me?
Reverant is offline  
Old 04-10-2013, 05:59 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
 
JustinHoMi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hillsborough, NC
Posts: 273
Total Cats: 1
Default

No, I don't tune for 14.7. But MLV or Autotune can see 14.7, and therefore determine what 12.5 (or whatever) is. Verify on a dyno... or with a wideband :-D
JustinHoMi is offline  
Old 04-11-2013, 11:25 AM
  #26  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

Originally Posted by Reverant
Do people on this forum actually tell others to do power runs aiming for 14.7 so that they can then do the math? And how do you verify that your tune is actually ok?
Initially, you'd tune the VE table, with incorporate AFR on, and your AFR targets pretty much set at stoich throughout. Then, adjust your AFR targets, once the VE table has been tuned and you will be hitting your targets as inputted in the AFR table. By doing it this way, you're making a true VE table, not a "PW" table.

Because if your VE table is able to hit stoich throughout, and since the AFR targets are part of the fuel equation, then changing the AFR targets will add/subtract fuel based on the equation.

where:

PW = ReqFuel * VE * MAP * stoich / targetAFR * GammaE

as opposed to:

PW = ReqFuel * VE * MAP * GammaE


tuning at stoich will mean stoich / targetAFR = 1

then if you want to target 12.0:1, 14.7 / 12 = 1.225, so you'll add 22.5% more fuel.

I dont really see how else you can tune a NB.
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-11-2013, 11:39 AM
  #27  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Brain pretty much explained how to tune on a refined ecu. IMO anything else that doesnt allow the use of a VE and target afr table like MS does with incorporate afr is a massive waste of time and shouldn't be bought because the people who made it are either lazy or idiots.
Leafy is offline  
Old 04-11-2013, 11:47 AM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
JustinHoMi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hillsborough, NC
Posts: 273
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Brain pretty much explained how to tune on a refined ecu.
FWIW, I created a tune from complete scratch using a NB sensor. I sorta guessed on my initial map. Then I tuned idle... then added 500 rpms... then 500 more, and so on.

I had to do this because I was using Airflow Meter mode (no MAP sensor).
JustinHoMi is offline  
Old 04-11-2013, 11:48 AM
  #29  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Godless Commie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 3,214
Total Cats: 1,687
Default

Here is my action plan:

I will first upgrade the firmware to 3.2.4 so I can use TS for tuning.

Then, I will install a wideband + gauge to get all values right. Keeping the WB setup, or reverting back to NB once it is tuned is something that is up in the air at this point.

My biggest fear is completely screwing it up with this method. This is because the system is modified to begin with, and I really do not know if they used standard I/O ports. In other words, I am not sure whether or not I will be able to use the existing wiring harness once I upgrade the firmware in the ECU.

What the hell... It will be a great learning experience. The scooter has tons more power already. Push comes to shove, I can always start from scratch and build a dedicated MS for it.

Right, Rev?
Godless Commie is offline  
Old 04-11-2013, 11:48 AM
  #30  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

with that being said, I still dont do it that way*.




* only cause I dont want to retune to end up with the same end result.
Braineack is offline  
Old 04-11-2013, 11:52 AM
  #31  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Godless Commie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 3,214
Total Cats: 1,687
Default

I will however, have a ton of questions for you guys.

Here's the first one:

What's best for a single cylinder, 4 cycle engine:
* Speed density
* Alpha-N
* Hybrid

I see that quite a few bike engines use Alpha-N.

What do you guys think?
Godless Commie is offline  
Old 04-11-2013, 04:27 PM
  #32  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Oscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bolton, UK
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
Default

Depends, can you get a decent MAP signal? You could do hybrid/ITB mode if your ecu supports that.
Oscar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frank_and_Beans
Supercharger Discussion
13
09-12-2016 08:17 PM
LucaCarMods
Build Threads
11
02-14-2016 06:13 AM
E=MC^2
DIY Turbo Discussion
29
10-20-2015 12:03 AM
elior77
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
14
09-17-2015 09:20 PM
compuw22c
MEGAsquirt
0
09-14-2015 06:08 PM



Quick Reply: Calling all MS gurus - scooter EFI conversion help



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.