Got a blog about tuning my car - hope you like.
#21
I think that you wouldn't want EGO (or it is not effective) in boost.
I haven't had problems with AFR in boost that needed correction - sometime getting in and out of boost happen to fast for EGO to even react.
The AFR areas where EGO is most needed (as I see it) are idle and cruise.
I haven't had problems with AFR in boost that needed correction - sometime getting in and out of boost happen to fast for EGO to even react.
The AFR areas where EGO is most needed (as I see it) are idle and cruise.
Let me fix the one sentence:
I haven't had problems with AFR in boost that needed correction that I have noticed yet - sometime getting in and out of boost happen to fast for EGO to even react, but I will risk my engine by not putting any kind of safeguard on the boosted cells, where it being off can cause the most harm to the motor.
#22
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
let me be clear:
But I dont run closed loop at WOT either.
There's plenty of cruising situations that you get into a little boost. There's no reason to go into open loop the instant you make boost.
But I dont run closed loop at WOT either.
There's plenty of cruising situations that you get into a little boost. There's no reason to go into open loop the instant you make boost.
#24
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
and even then you just need one/two rows for boost.
one for your low boost slightly leaner AFR target and then your target for 11.8:1. all boost above that row would target the same. and also remember MS interpolates between cells.
you really dont need THAT much resolution in the AFR table if youre pretty much just targeting 15.0:1 throughout the entire map. a 1x1 table would be sufficient.
I'd also like to see people start using "include AFR table" in the fueling algorithm.
one for your low boost slightly leaner AFR target and then your target for 11.8:1. all boost above that row would target the same. and also remember MS interpolates between cells.
you really dont need THAT much resolution in the AFR table if youre pretty much just targeting 15.0:1 throughout the entire map. a 1x1 table would be sufficient.
I'd also like to see people start using "include AFR table" in the fueling algorithm.
#26
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
your adaptive timing curve should have positive and negative values.
and you should be clear about how the curve works: if the idle strays from your idle target by the amount in the curve, it adjusts the timing to get it back instead of opening/closing the idle valve.
so if the idle is ever above your target, you're not using timing to slow it back down.
you can tune it by turning on/off headlights and a/c without idle up active.
and you should be clear about how the curve works: if the idle strays from your idle target by the amount in the curve, it adjusts the timing to get it back instead of opening/closing the idle valve.
so if the idle is ever above your target, you're not using timing to slow it back down.
you can tune it by turning on/off headlights and a/c without idle up active.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post