MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Using GM MAF sensor?

Old 10-23-2006, 01:13 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
StankCheeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 375
Total Cats: 0
Default Using GM MAF sensor?

Megasquirt seems pretty flexible, is there any reason we couldn't use a typical GM MAF sensor as long as we had the MAF tables?
StankCheeze is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 02:29 AM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,976
Total Cats: 355
Default

None apparently, you just need to make sure that the MAF you have outputs 0-5V (or use a voltage divider if Vmax>5V).
Reverant is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 06:24 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
kingofl337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 248
Total Cats: 0
Default

Why would you want to use MAF over MAP? Especialy when you can retune the MAP?
kingofl337 is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 11:49 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
StankCheeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 375
Total Cats: 0
Default

Edit: Nevermind, it seems this won't work for my application

Last edited by StankCheeze; 10-23-2006 at 12:16 PM.
StankCheeze is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 12:46 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
bripab007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,450
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by kingofl337
Why would you want to use MAF over MAP? Especialy when you can retune the MAP?
The hotwire MAF is more precise?
bripab007 is offline  
Old 10-24-2006, 08:31 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Alta_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 228
Total Cats: 7
Default

It seems to me at WOT a MAP is going to be fixed value. A MAF will actually tell the ecm someting about what is actually happening.

At WOT is not the intake pressure allways going to be near atmosphere no matter what the rpm?

I should think a MAF should be able to correct the fuel curve better.


Ron
Alta_Racer is offline  
Old 10-24-2006, 12:30 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
richyvrlimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Warrington/Birmingham
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
Default

Originally Posted by Alta_Racer
It seems to me at WOT a MAP is going to be fixed value. A MAF will actually tell the ecm someting about what is actually happening.

At WOT is not the intake pressure allways going to be near atmosphere no matter what the rpm?

I should think a MAF should be able to correct the fuel curve better.


Ron
At WOT the MAP signal is constantly varying. it's not a flatline as you're suggesting, there are fluctuations in the signal.
richyvrlimited is offline  
Old 10-24-2006, 01:59 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
kingofl337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 248
Total Cats: 0
Default

The MS supports dual pressure sensors so you can calculate for altitude on the fly. The diffrence really doesn't do alot unless you like to run on the edge. I which ccase a WB02 would fix that issue.
kingofl337 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM
slomiata
MEGAsquirt
5
10-07-2015 01:11 PM
viriiguy
General Miata Chat
5
09-28-2015 07:39 PM
Greasyman
General Miata Chat
2
09-28-2015 10:44 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Using GM MAF sensor?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 AM.