MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Stranded; warm no-start

Old 03-02-2008, 10:38 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
Default Stranded; warm no-start

Took the car for a spin; first time it had been driven in months. Went to the grocery store, and the car didn't start when I came back out. Felt like there was no fuel. I figured my warm start enrichment settings were wonky, so let the car cool down a bit. Sure enough, started up after 10 minutes or so of sitting. It hadn't been a long drive over, and I don't think coolant was fully up to temp, but pretty sure IAT was.

Anyway, this gives me some motivation to get my PalmEdit worked out, so I can change cranking settings in a pinch without lugging around a laptop constantly. Anybody use PalmEdit?
Atlanta93LE is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 10:39 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Saml01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
Default

I doubt warm up has anything to do with it not wanting to start up after driving.
Saml01 is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 11:56 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,482
Total Cats: 372
Default

You do. Having a palm in the glovebox to make adjustments whenever for whatever is a nice option.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 12:09 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

Man, setup some serious IAT based enrichment to conquer that IAT heatsoak. Make sure your cranking settings are not averaging CLT and IAT as well that will cause some serious issues.
These are my current IAT based enrichment values. Scott uses like 2 times the correction I do but this is working for me right now. I only do this to keep my idle stable as the sensor heat soaks at idle sometimes. Shouldn't have anything to do with it not starting unless you're averaging the two.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:00 AM
  #5  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,483
Total Cats: 4,076
Default




this is what i was using, mine would heatsoak like crazy within 30secs of shutting off the car and I'd no fuel. this put me at 13:1 for a few moments after cranking until the temps dropped down, i used to have a nice log of it but lost it when i dropped my laptop.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:05 AM
  #6  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
Default

Thanks guys; I'll take a look tonight at what's going on with my current settings, and give these things a try.
Atlanta93LE is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:06 AM
  #7  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

is this the coolant related air density table you guys are posting?
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:29 AM
  #8  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,483
Total Cats: 4,076
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
is this the coolant related air density table you guys are posting?

yes, but it's setup for AIT corrections, not CLT.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:33 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
richard_ha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 0
Default

So it puts more fuel in the hotter the air?
richard_ha is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:37 AM
  #10  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
Default

The more I look at things, the more I think I was just in a spot of untuned cranking pulse widths. It was a short drive, so coolant was in that "warmer than ambient, but not fully warmed up" zone that hadn't ever been tuned. I may try out Scott's cranking PWM values he posted a while back; same engine and injectors I have.
Atlanta93LE is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:40 AM
  #11  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
yes, but it's setup for AIT corrections, not CLT.
Yeah I get it.

Originally Posted by richard_ha
So it puts more fuel in the hotter the air?
Sort of, but in an opposite approach. It doesn't allow a fuel cut due to an artificial IAT reading.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:43 AM
  #12  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Saml01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by richard_ha
So it puts more fuel in the hotter the air?
Computer thinks the air is hot, when it actually is cold and cuts back the fuel. So it just adds more fuel.
Saml01 is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:50 AM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
richard_ha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 0
Default

Well, my intake temperature is always between ambient (9c, 48f today) and never goes over 26c (79f) and my table looks like this... does it need changing?

Name:  dcdb7170.jpg
Views: 90
Size:  62.4 KB
richard_ha is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 12:08 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

I only use the IAT enrichments for idle correction i have them disabled by 1800 RPM i think. I think the default option disables it by like 3k rpm?
cjernigan is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 12:12 PM
  #15  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,483
Total Cats: 4,076
Default

i have mine weening out starting at 1500RPM and fully off at 2000RPM.

I also only have AIT corrections on past 85°F, i don't want the rest of the fuel map touched by them. As it looks above, at 50°F you're getting 5% more fuel. at 70°F your have 21% more fuel...the whole purpose is for heat soaked hot starts, not full time enrichments.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 12:15 PM
  #16  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

I guess you could use this for intercooler heatsoak after running lots of BOOOSSSSTTTTT but that's not really an issue considering how fast they cool off once out of boost. Maybe on the track this would be necessary. Adding 10% once your IAT temps are above 100-110 or something like that. You could even set it up that way considering your IATs would only be that high at idle, before starting, or under lots of hot n heavy boostin.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 03-04-2008, 08:50 AM
  #17  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
Default

Name:  IATcorrection.jpg
Views: 77
Size:  6.8 KB

Well, these are my MSPNP default IAT corrections, so I'm thinking it wasn't IAT heatsoak.
Atlanta93LE is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:21 AM
  #18  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
Default

I hate to bring this back from the dead, but it was my thread originally, so

Anyway...I noticed after some hard driving that my idle is pretty rich. Well, quite rich. Like, 11:1 rich. I'm thinking this is a direct result of the awfully high IAT correction values from the mspnp base map that I posted earlier. I'm posting here for a sanity check: am I off base about this?

My IAT was only ~80°F +/- 5°F, which would still increase fuel by a significant amount based on my table. I think I'll try something closer to Brain's table tonight.
Atlanta93LE is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:23 AM
  #19  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

I'm going to say yes, knock them down my 10 unit a piece and see if that's good enough.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 06:03 PM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
kotomile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
Default

Feel free to give me the MS-n00b smackdown, but I thought cranking enrichments didn't have anything to do with idle or anything once the engine was running.
kotomile is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Stranded; warm no-start



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 AM.