MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Megasquirt vs Microsquirt for my rebuild.

Old 09-06-2012, 11:28 AM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default Megasquirt vs Microsquirt for my rebuild.

All that I seem to find online is that the Microsquirt is similar to megasquirt 2 but for smaller applications.

The Map sensor being external is fine for me assuming that you can adjust the parameters required to run different sensors.


What kind of actual differences would there be in a build where I will be building a complete engine and chassis wiring harness in a chassis up race build where i wont need the ECU to control everything like fuel pumps and idle valves...

I found this link and it seems like it would work totally fine i just dont see why its not used more in the MT area...
Megasquirt Product Comparison

Matt
shlammed is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 11:45 AM
  #2  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,483
Total Cats: 4,076
Default

the DIYPNP and MSPNP2 are built using microsquirt. it's all the same bro.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 12:02 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

same software and all?

So i can use the wealth of knowledge here and the basemaps etc just plug them in and (presuming i wired the engine correctly) go to town?


Unreal. This is perfect!
shlammed is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 03:05 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
WestfieldMX5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 999
Total Cats: 73
Default

microsquirt can run ms2extra firmware, so yes it uses the same maps. It cannot use (or be upgraded to) ms3 though.
WestfieldMX5 is offline  
Old 09-13-2013, 12:05 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

I want to bump this back up....


I am looking at the microsquirt info again and im looking at the following:


1.The fuel injector drives will max out at 5 amps each, enough to drive one low-impedance (or 4 high-impedance) injector per bank. To get everything to fit without lots of heat sinking, MicroSquirt uses the ST VND5N07 from STMicroelectronics to drive the injectors. This is not a 'peak and hold' driver, but it does clamp the current at 5 amps, so it can be used with one low-impedance injector per bank, however the close time may be a tad higher (or you can use resistors). For up to 4 high-impedance injectors per bank, it should work fine. For example, for motorcycle use MicroSquirt will be perfect!
So what would this mean for running a miata engine? would stock injectors be fine if i wanted to use them for the time being?
shlammed is offline  
Old 09-13-2013, 04:21 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
southernmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 328
Total Cats: 4
Default

Yes
southernmx5 is offline  
Old 09-13-2013, 05:28 PM
  #7  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,015
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
I want to bump this back up....

I am looking at the microsquirt info again and im looking at the following:

So what would this mean for running a miata engine? would stock injectors be fine if i wanted to use them for the time being?
The Miata, like most OEM applications, uses high impedance injectors. Thus, micro squirt would work fine in your application.

That said,MS3 rocks your world.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 09-13-2013, 05:30 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
southernmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 328
Total Cats: 4
Default

Interesting note: the microsquirt and ms3x share the same fuel injector driver ICs.
southernmx5 is offline  
Old 10-30-2013, 03:56 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Im reading over the wiring diagrams and such for the microsquirt now prepping (mentally) for the wiring.

I am a bit confused on a few fronts.
Keep in mind- 1.6 Miata engine with mostly stock sensors

1. Cam position sensor wiring. there are 4 wires, 2 signals, 12v and gnd. what respective pins on the MICROsquirt do these go to?
Im guessing these are the VR (1/2) in? the Microsquirt harness has two wires for each of those inputs (positive and negative) Total wild guess would be positive. If i were to use a Miata basemap for this, would the CKP or CMP be VR IN#1?


Ok, now that question is out of the way...this should be the more simple one...

2. I am planning to run LS truck coils in wasted spark. The microsquirt has logic level outputs, and There is the IGN out #1 and #2. Am I able to just split the wire for each outputs to the coil signal pins to set this up on wasted spark?

Thanks!
shlammed is offline  
Old 10-30-2013, 08:39 PM
  #10  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,015
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
1. Cam position sensor wiring. there are 4 wires, 2 signals, 12v and gnd. what respective pins on the MICROsquirt do these go to?
Im guessing these are the VR (1/2) in? the Microsquirt harness has two wires for each of those inputs (positive and negative) Total wild guess would be positive.
The inputs of the Microsquirt are non-differential. Only the + input is truly active, the so-called - input is just a ground.

So yes, both to the + inputs. The pullups appear to be built-in, so no worries there.

EDIT: I just looked at the latest (rev 3) schematic, and they have, in fact, changed this in the current version. The new ones DO have differential inputs, using the MAX9926 chip (an excellent design). Same advice holds, though. Use the + inputs, leave the - inputs unconnected.

I do NOT, however, see any pullup resistors in the Rev 3 design, so those will need to be added externally. Splice a 1k resistor in between 5v and each of the two signal wires.

(Now I know who DIY copied when they designed the tach input section of the MS3P.)


I really like what they did here- this is a nice circuit, and very similar to what I used to build on my custom units:



For those who have been wondering (I certainly had been, since I was deemed not good enough to see the schematic for it) I can pretty much guarantee that this is what the TachIn section of the MS3Pro looks like.



If i were to use a Miata basemap for this, would the CKP or CMP be VR IN#1?
CKP is always the primary input, on any generation of MS, running any maps. CMP can never be the #1 input.


2. Am I able to just split the wire for each outputs to the coil signal pins to set this up on wasted spark?
Yes. Parallel each output to two coils. This is how we've been doing the Toyota COP conversions for years.
Attached Thumbnails Megasquirt vs Microsquirt for my rebuild.-micro.gif  

Last edited by Joe Perez; 10-30-2013 at 08:49 PM.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 08:52 AM
  #11  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I do NOT, however, see any pullup resistors in the Rev 3 design, so those will need to be added externally. Splice a 1k resistor in between 5v and each of the two signal wires.
this?
Attached Thumbnails Megasquirt vs Microsquirt for my rebuild.-like-.jpg  
shlammed is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 09:08 AM
  #12  
Supporting Vendor
 
Matt Cramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,332
Total Cats: 67
Default

Yep - we used the exact same schematic on the MS3-Pro as on the MicroSquirt. It was working great on the MicroSquirt, so we brought the whole thing over.
__________________
Matt Cramer
www.diyautotune.com
Matt Cramer is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 10:01 AM
  #13  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Great. Thanks.


I am planning in these early stages to run the car (1.6) off a Honda Throttle body on a custom inlet manifold. I wont have provisions for an idle valve.

This car is RACE ONLY. Is there going to be a problem with running it without the idle valve?
shlammed is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 10:06 AM
  #14  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,483
Total Cats: 4,076
Default

no. but that setup doesn't stop you from running a valve.
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 10:09 AM
  #15  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Use the + inputs, leave the - inputs unconnected.
Reading the microsquirt setup guide again... I noticed this...

VR return ground (Ampseal pin 33) - there is a separate VR(-) input on the AMPSEAL, this needs to be connected to the VR sensor(s). If you are using two VR sensors, return both back to this wire (these are low current and can be shared on the one wire return path) Do not ground the VR sensor anywhere else, return the ground back to the VR(-) terminal. On the MicroSquirt® EFI controller, this return goes directly back to the VR input circuit's transistor/op amp and not to the ground plane, this keeps the high amplitude VR voltages (and resulting currents) isolated to the VR circuit.
So I hook the VR1in+ to the crank signal wire from the CAS, VR1in- to the CAS ground and then feed the CAS its required input voltage seperate from the microsquirt harness?
shlammed is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 11:02 AM
  #16  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,176
Total Cats: 1,680
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
Great. Thanks.


I am planning in these early stages to run the car (1.6) off a Honda Throttle body on a custom inlet manifold. I wont have provisions for an idle valve.

This car is RACE ONLY. Is there going to be a problem with running it without the idle valve?
As long as the Honda TB has an idle adjust screw to crack it open, I see not problem running without an idle valve. I know Savington does not use them on his race cars.

Last edited by shuiend; 10-31-2013 at 12:09 PM.
shuiend is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 11:44 AM
  #17  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,015
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
this?
It's hard to tell from that drawing.

You want this:



In which the two resistors that I forgot to label are around 1k. (Doesn't have to be exact. You could use 5k and it'd still work fine. Don't go any lower than 1k.)
Attached Thumbnails Megasquirt vs Microsquirt for my rebuild.-pullup.gif  
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 11:47 AM
  #18  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,015
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
Reading the microsquirt setup guide again... I noticed this...
VR return ground (Ampseal pin 33) - there is a separate VR(-) input on the AMPSEAL, this needs to be connected to the VR sensor(s). If you are using two VR sensors, return both back to this wire (these are low current and can be shared on the one wire return path) Do not ground the VR sensor anywhere else, return the ground back to the VR(-) terminal. On the MicroSquirt® EFI controller, this return goes directly back to the VR input circuit's transistor/op amp and not to the ground plane, this keeps the high amplitude VR voltages (and resulting currents) isolated to the VR circuit.
So I hook the VR1in+ to the crank signal wire from the CAS, VR1in- to the CAS ground and then feed the CAS its required input voltage seperate from the microsquirt harness?
NO!

That documentation is obsolete (it refers to the OLD circuit), and it ALSO applies only to the use of actual VR sensors, which are inherently differential. You are not using differential VR sensors, so you don't have to worry about keeping the circuits balanced and dealing with high voltage.

You only need two wires between the CAS and the MS- CKP and CMP, as shown in my post above.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 11:51 AM
  #19  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
You only need two wires between the CAS and the MS- CKP and CMP, as shown in my post above.
ok. plus the 12v and gnd, correct? Just seperate of the MS.
Switched on with part of the main relay- same circuit as the injector power and ecu power.

Im pretty sure this is how you mentioned it, but I am just making sure.
shlammed is offline  
Old 10-31-2013, 12:49 PM
  #20  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,015
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
ok. plus the 12v and gnd, correct? Just seperate of the MS.
Switched on with part of the main relay- same circuit as the injector power and ecu power.
Yeah, I assumed that you would just be leaving the existing 12v and GND connections alone- they do not go to the ECU, they're just part of the car's front harness. Assuming you're starting with a complete, stock Miata harness, you don't need to do anything all all with the power and ground wires- they're taken care of already.
Joe Perez is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Megasquirt vs Microsquirt for my rebuild.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 AM.