MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Wideband 02 heatsink...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2011, 04:48 AM
  #21  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
wayne_curr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 4
Default

This is happening to me all of a sudden too. This thread is win. Going to try the new (old) firmware tomorrow.
wayne_curr is offline  
Old 02-08-2011, 10:39 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
southernmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 328
Total Cats: 4
Default

I havent had a single lc1 error since the firmware rollback. Innovate won't admit that the latest firmware is too sensitive to drastic changes in afr which causes the e8s. There are some good threads about it over on their forums.
southernmx5 is offline  
Old 02-08-2011, 10:52 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Gryff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 924
Total Cats: 16
Default

Its been happening to me as well, Everytime I exit the highway without fail, I'm gonna try this as well and report back. heres to hoping
Gryff is offline  
Old 02-09-2011, 10:47 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
jnshk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lake Jackson, TX
Posts: 166
Total Cats: 7
Default

I've had the error 8 on a stock NA engine a couple times as well. If it happens again I might give this a try too. Thanks for the timely thread!
jnshk is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 07:24 PM
  #25  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

I've been experiencing this issue. There is some recent information over on Innovate's forums here (posts #38 and #40):

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/f...t=12655&page=3

The gist:

Hello,

I have recently spent some time investigating E8 issues on several devices including LC-1s. There is a lot of confusion about what causes an E8. The truth is that lots of failures will cause an E8. The E8 is a general sensor timing error. The direct digital pulse is not responding as expected. Here are some possible causes:

1) sensor out of temperature range.
2) hardware problems inside the DD device (typically opamp failure)
3) cracked sensor (usually caused by shock cooling the sensor, thus the need for extended bungs).

Now, assuming there are no hardware problems (cases 2 and 3 above) the most likely E8 cause is the sensor out of temperature range. Our customer service has mentioned "over cooling" in the past. The reason this can happen is due to the heater algorithm that we use. It is a PID loop. The original poster of this thread has the classic example of over cooling. When he was on the throttle hard the sensor heats up. Suddenly he let off the throttle. At that point our PID loop had what’s called integral windup. It’s an error condition that takes some time for the heater to correct. So while the sensor was cooling down (via the cold air while off the throttle) the Integral had to wind down before it could start applying the heater again. Meanwhile the sensor got too cool and could no longer take DD readings. At that point it threw an E8.

Now for the good news! We have developed a new PID algorithm that will respond to Integral windup faster. So it will be able to almost immediately start applying the heater to keep the sensor within operating temperature. In addition to that scenario it will handle the scenario where the sensor can over cool even when the sensor heater is on full blast. This scenario is not as common but is possible. The new algorithm will set the LC-1 into a re-heating mode and re-try readings. This would be a temporary E8 condition while the sensor is heating up. In the past the LC-1 would throw the E8 and give up.

The fix is in the form of a new firmware. I have been testing it for months now and would like to start beta testing it in the field. If any of you would like to try the new FW please let me know. Ideally I would like someone that can reproduce the E8 problem like the original poster described. After the new FW is installed I would like to know if it fixed the problem. I would like to stress extreme caution when upgrading FW on an LC-1 as if the download fails the only way to fix it is to cut it open which destroys the rubber overmold. Test the connection on you computer via LM Programmer and Logworks before trying a FW upgrade!! This is very important.


Please PM me if interested in the FW.

Scott VanDell
Innovate Motorsports
Hardware Engineer
and

For everyone else, I just realized that this forum does not have a private message (PM) feature. Ooops. So if you would like to try the beta FW please email me at:
svandell@innovatemotorsports.com
__________________
Scott VanDell
Innovate Motorsports
Hardware Engineer
As for me, I'm going to experiment with disabling overrun cutoff in the MS and see if that takes care of E8. I think that will confirm what the Innovate guys are chasing.
hornetball is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 07:27 PM
  #26  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Jeff_Ciesielski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,770
Total Cats: 31
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
...too long to quote....
This has been pretty well known for some time that their current firmware causes E8 conditions when the sensor gets 'too cool' such as during overrun. See my post above regarding downgrading your firmware.
Jeff_Ciesielski is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 07:34 PM
  #27  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
MartinezA92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 1,784
Total Cats: 42
Default

Really interesting. It explains why my LC1 always threw the 8 off throttle. Downgraded though and its been fine.
MartinezA92 is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 09:27 PM
  #28  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff_Ciesielski
This has been pretty well known for some time that their current firmware causes E8 conditions when the sensor gets 'too cool' such as during overrun. See my post above regarding downgrading your firmware.
The point was that an Innovate engineer is working on the issue and is looking for beta testers for a firmware UPGRADE (to beta 1.20). That's the new part. The post looking for beta testers is from 2 weeks ago.
hornetball is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 09:53 PM
  #29  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Oscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bolton, UK
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
Default

So they finally acknowledged the dodgy 1.10 update and are trying to fix it?
Oscar is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 11:28 AM
  #30  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

Originally Posted by Oscar
So they finally acknowledged the dodgy 1.10 update and are trying to fix it?
That's what it looks like. I've contacted them to be a beta tester, but haven't heard back yet.

The 1.20 fix sounds promising. It is a two-pronged approach:

1. Make the PID loop more responsive to rapidly changing conditions (they are probably programming some logic to zero out the integral term under certain trigger events).
2. Revise the algorithm so that when E8 conditions occur, the system tries to recover for a set time period (including a zeroing of the temperature control PID loop integral term) before giving up completely. The 1.10 firmware apparently gives up the instant that E8 conditions happen.

I suspect that for the past couple of years, Innovate, like most companies, has been in "batten down the hatches" mode. They probably downsized significantly. Now that sales are picking back up, they've brought on some help and are tackling some longstanding issues. The firmware release dates on their support page tend to confirm this suspicion.
hornetball is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 01:45 PM
  #31  
Supporting Vendor
 
Matt Cramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,332
Total Cats: 67
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
I suspect that for the past couple of years, Innovate, like most companies, has been in "batten down the hatches" mode. They probably downsized significantly. Now that sales are picking back up, they've brought on some help and are tackling some longstanding issues. The firmware release dates on their support page tend to confirm this suspicion.
True enough - they even ended up with the company sold to a different parent company in the last few years. Same guys working there, so it wasn't particularly obvious, other than what you noticed about not being able to bring out new stuff.
__________________
Matt Cramer
www.diyautotune.com
Matt Cramer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Goldwar
DIY Turbo Discussion
2
09-29-2015 09:20 AM
btabor
ECUs and Tuning
10
09-28-2015 05:33 PM
itsMikey
MSPNP
3
09-28-2015 06:40 AM



Quick Reply: Wideband 02 heatsink...?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.