Prefabbed Turbo Kits A place to discuss prefabricated turbo kits on the market

psi on stock 1.6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2007, 11:57 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
ckandes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 97
Total Cats: 0
Default psi on stock 1.6?

how much boost can a stock 1.6 handle? I've heard of 13psi being the limit, safely. is this about accurate?
ckandes1 is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:03 AM
  #2  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

Could be perfectly fine given a good tune, or perfectly deadly.

I think the 250rwhp range is where people stop pushing it....don't look at it in PSI levels.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:10 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
ckandes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 97
Total Cats: 0
Default

so i'f im staying around or under 200whp i dont have to be too worried as long as i dont have poor tuning?
ckandes1 is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 02:35 AM
  #4  
Guest
 
krayzrac3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 407
Total Cats: 0
Default

the key to any engine is tuning... back when i had a z and would hang around on the 350z forums there were people blowing their motors with stock greddy twin turbo kits 5.5 psi. Then there were people with 450whp and a AWESOME tune that were daily driving it and raping the **** out of the car with no problems (except for the dreaded POS Viscous LSD's they come with)
krayzrac3r is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 10:09 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
KMag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 144
Total Cats: 3
Default

Is this going to be a street car or track car? 12-13 psi for the street is plenty of fun and will suffice for most all accelleration issues that you will need. Rule of thumb is also that if tuned properly, it will give you near the same lifespan of an N/A engine.

KMag
KMag is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:06 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Arkmage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,895
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KMag
Rule of thumb is also that if tuned properly, it will give you near the same lifespan of an N/A engine. KMag
That thumb must get hit with a lot of hammers... I don't believe that in the least. More power means more force and every component will fatigue at a faster rate. The lifespan will be reduced, just not to a degree that makes it worth driving NA forever.
Arkmage is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:13 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
boostinsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
Default

I believe that Corky said that on average, the life span is reduced 25% for a boosted car, can't remember where I saw that, but I read it somewhere.
boostinsteve is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:42 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
ckandes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 97
Total Cats: 0
Default

The life span is definitely decreased, but IMO who cares. Who wants to live long if life is shitty?

I'm going to be using whatever miata I purchase mostly for DD use, but also monthly autocrosses.
ckandes1 is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:14 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
akaryrye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 2,533
Total Cats: 0
Default

engines are a dime a dozen for 80 - 120k miles. blow one up and throw another in.
akaryrye is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 06:07 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
adbradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 999
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by akaryrye
engines are a dime a dozen for 80 - 120k miles. blow one up and throw another in.
1.8 being rebuilt in my garage waiting for the 1.6 to let go
adbradley is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 06:32 PM
  #11  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
TheBandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Broken Arrow,Ok
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
Default

I think Andy had his 1.6L at or over 300whp for several years. Not many go over the 250 mark without new internals. I think around 300 is probably about as much as i'd want to run without new stuff internally.
-Michael-
TheBandit is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 08:23 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
brgracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ambler, PA
Posts: 1,275
Total Cats: 1
Default

Don't forget, that it's not just the engine that you have to consider. North of 200hp is where you have to start worrying about the tranny, diff, overheating, bigger brakes, etc...

Granted there are a few who have taken the stock 1.6 to great heights such as Ric at RM, but then again he blew that engine shooting for over 400hp as he was testing the limits of a junkyard motor, but I don't think many of us are in the same boat as him.
brgracer is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 10:25 PM
  #13  
Guest
 
krayzrac3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 407
Total Cats: 0
Default

brgracer.... what you have right now is what im shooting for. That is WAY MORE than enough. 250whp on a car that weighs 2200 lbs is ridiculously fast. My Z had 255whp with a couple bolt ons and that thing weighed 3200 lbs. Boy was it fast now I can only imagine that power with 1000lbs less weight.
krayzrac3r is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 10:43 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
disturbedfan121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,552
Total Cats: -2
Default

im shooting for 215 anything in particular i should change other than the stock 1.6 diff?
disturbedfan121 is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 11:19 PM
  #15  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

brakes. radiator. suspension.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:36 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
4sfed5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 206
Total Cats: 9
Default

HAVING BEEN in a 270RWHP 1990 MIATA that was very easily doing 5.2 second 0-60 times ON THE STREET i can vouch that 250+RWHP is a FAST FAST CAR. I have to make do with my 200rwhp.
4sfed5 is offline  
Old 02-15-2007, 05:14 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
juhanis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Campbell, California
Posts: 106
Total Cats: 0
Default

i dont know how much power i'm making, i'm hanging with a stock c5 vette at 11psi. and i run 15psi on 100octane with my 16g turbo. hopefully i can get some numbers soon. my motor is a stock 170k mile 1.6, no problems so far.
juhanis is offline  
Old 02-15-2007, 08:39 AM
  #18  
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
magnamx-5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: nowhere
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
Default

yeah i wanna see how that 16g holds up the manifolds arent horrible for the money, you are running an IC though so you might be abit different than mine at 11-15psi. what are you running for ECU agian?
magnamx-5 is offline  
Old 02-15-2007, 04:57 PM
  #19  
Newb
 
k1n0y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

thats pretty fast
k1n0y is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
01-03-2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
10-03-2015 11:04 AM
Trent
WTB
2
10-01-2015 12:15 PM



Quick Reply: psi on stock 1.6?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.