Aerodynamics Splitters, spoilers, and all the aero advice you can handle.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wing with top down compensation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2019, 11:57 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Halcyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 323
Total Cats: 2
Default Wing with top down compensation?

https://occamsracers.com/results/ope...-and-fastback/


According to that article, open top is 2.5x less effective.
So can I adjust the angle to get to my desired downforce?
For example, with the gtc200. If I want the downforce created at 0 degrees. With an open top can I pitch it at 12 degrees and get close to the same downforce? I’m assuming drag would be about the same as well?
Halcyon is offline  
Old 09-25-2019, 01:57 AM
  #2  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

The wing is less effective because the airflow without a top is incredibly dirty. Dirty airflow across a wing will generate lots of drag and very little downforce. Changing the AOA will add even more drag and not much additional downforce.

Get a hardtop.
Savington is offline  
Old 09-26-2019, 09:36 PM
  #3  
Newb
 
Occam’s Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 43
Total Cats: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Halcyon
https://occamsracers.com/results/ope...-and-fastback/


According to that article, open top is 2.5x less effective.
So can I adjust the angle to get to my desired downforce?
For example, with the gtc200. If I want the downforce created at 0 degrees. With an open top can I pitch it at 12 degrees and get close to the same downforce? I’m assuming drag would be about the same as well?
I didn’t test the GTC wing, but if you look at my article on NACA wings and do some experimenting on the airfoil tools page, you’ll find that virtually no single-element wing works well at 12 degrees. At that angle, most wings will stall, meaning more drag and less downforce.

https://occamsracers.com/2019/05/23/...airfoil-tools/

Savington may have different data, but my testing didn’t show any increase in drag with the wing and open top, despite the turbulence. In fact the wing was .03 Cd across all tops, and I kind of wonder if the wing might have helped clean up the wake because the open top should have had mode drag. In any case, you can play with the NCrit value to simulate turbulence.

It comes down to this: you need clean airflow under the wing.

Last edited by Occam’s Racer; 09-26-2019 at 09:52 PM.
Occam’s Racer is offline  
Old 09-27-2019, 01:08 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Halcyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 323
Total Cats: 2
Default

Thanks for the response guys.
I enjoy driving at the track with the top down.
But I guess I’ll drag the hard top along and experiment.
Halcyon is offline  
Old 09-27-2019, 10:57 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
flier129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
Default

Running the hard-top instead of open-top is 100% the better option. If you didn't have a hard-top then putting the soft-top up would be the way to go.

FWIW 9LR wángs produce the same CFD results in open air as they do on our standard mounts on a NA.

Last edited by flier129; 09-28-2019 at 09:28 AM.
flier129 is offline  
Old 09-27-2019, 04:27 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Morello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 418
Total Cats: 45
Default

Originally Posted by flier129
Running the hard-top instead of open-top is 100% the better option. If you didn't have a hard-top then putting the soft-top open would be the way to go.

FWIW 9LR wángs produce the same CFD results in open air as they do on our standard mounts on a NA.
I find it hard to believe the soft top open (with a roll bar) is better than soft top up...
Morello is offline  
Old 09-27-2019, 04:59 PM
  #7  
Newb
 
Occam’s Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 43
Total Cats: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Morello
I find it hard to believe the soft top open (with a roll bar) is better than soft top up...
^ Agree. I'd have to see data to believe otherwise.
Occam’s Racer is offline  
Old 09-28-2019, 09:29 AM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
flier129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
Default

putting the soft-top up ***

Typo! Johnny is rubbing off on me.
flier129 is offline  
Old 11-17-2019, 05:34 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
LuckyKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 88
Total Cats: 5
Default

Thanks for posting this. I didn't see that data before. It's helpful to see the data from the fastback. We built ours based off trolling this forum.

Cheers,
LuckyKid
Team PartsBadger
LuckyKid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BarendB
Race Prep
9
01-11-2018 06:40 PM
ThePass
Aerodynamics
59
12-04-2017 07:34 PM
joeereid
Race Prep
4
01-27-2016 03:17 PM
Buzz
WTB
0
10-01-2013 12:40 PM
ZX-Tex
Race Prep
41
04-13-2012 10:20 AM



Quick Reply: Wing with top down compensation?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 AM.