Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Extra baffling for the oil pan.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2010, 05:23 PM
  #61  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Builder
I've gone through a couple of engines (Impala) due to starvation and don't want that to happen to my new baby! I figured out what happened with the first engine and subsequent rebuild. The engine had a "High Flow" pump. So, under heavier loads, it emptied the pan more quickly...even with the extra quart of goo. And, I was G-forcing the oil away from the pickup, starving the engine with higher RPM downshifts.

I've changed driving technique to exclude downshifts to more than 2500 RPM, which seems to have eliminated the problem. The Accusump was originally intended for my other car and why it's on the shelf. Glad because it's going into the Miata in a couple of week.
Impala? Ok I think I met you a few years back at Reno-Fernley I did a 2 day event with Bonnie and Team-Racing.

Bob
bbundy is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 05:05 PM
  #62  
Bannisheded
 
Boost Joose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 345
Total Cats: -222
Default

Any final verdicts here? This was a very good thread and now I'm wondering what actually happened? Bundy, did you get the accusump and solve all your problems? Anyone go dry sump? ANyone find a superior baffle design? BUMP!
Boost Joose is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 05:46 PM
  #63  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Considering a bunch of threads came out of my oil pan drain bung I have a feeling I may have to do this mod soon.
hustler is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:43 PM
  #64  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Boost Joose
Any final verdicts here? This was a very good thread and now I'm wondering what actually happened? Bundy, did you get the accusump and solve all your problems? Anyone go dry sump? ANyone find a superior baffle design? BUMP!
Been running the baffle and an accusump for a while now.

The EPC valve pressure switch quit working right and was flaky so I’m just running the accusump with the switch bypassed so the electric valve opens with the ignition turned on.

Put the key in turn it to run and oil pressure comes up then I hit the start button. Turn the key off and the accusump stays charged at whatever pressure there was when I turned it off. While running the valve is open and the accusump comes into action if the pressure tries to drop.

So far so good.

However the last oil change a disturbing piece of metal was stuck to my magnetic drain plug. I’m pretty sure it was a small piece of a wrist pin circlip. Those things were a bitch to put in and take out The new Wiesco ones were twice as thick as the old ones. I may have damaged it during assembly/re-assembly after putting it together wrong the first time. I’m hoping there is enough of it left in that it still keeps the wrist pin located.

Id still like to go Dry sump as I think that would solve the crank case breather issues as well.


Bob
bbundy is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 08:05 PM
  #65  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy

However the last oil change a disturbing piece of metal was stuck to my magnetic drain plug. I’m pretty sure it was a small piece of a wrist pin circlip.
Scope the bore, you will definitely see the mark a chunk of circlip leaves when it pops out.

Bob, how many track hours did your two previous motors have before you tore them down?
Savington is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 04:44 PM
  #66  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Scope the bore, you will definitely see the mark a chunk of circlip leaves when it pops out.

Bob, how many track hours did your two previous motors have before you tore them down?
If you look at the bottom of the current iteration of Wiesco pistons you can see that a chunk of the circlip can fall out without scraping the bore at all. I also think there is a better chance than not that there is enough circlip left properly seated to still hold the wrist pin in place. Previous motors didn’t have much for track hours on them before Oil consumption issues followed by burnt exhaust valves. Didn’t even make a full year.
New Wiesco pistons and blocked off oil squrters seems to be much better.
bbundy is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 05:22 PM
  #67  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Bat Inc sells a fairly affordable Accusump valve-rig that I may pick up in the future (I will have a tough time picking it up in the past).
hustler is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:24 PM
  #68  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

FWIW I have a 3-qt accusump with an EPC valve. In a Miata, but with an LS1. It is mounted in the trunk to help with weight distribution. I have used it at several TT events and it works very well. When I can, I glance at oil pressures in long corners and I have always seen plenty of pressure. I have no pan baffling and the LS1 is worse than the Miata engine when it comes to oil starvation, especially lateral loads (in corners). It's a well known LS1 issue.

It takes a looooooooong time for the 3-qt to drain, at least at about 38 psi so I am not sure it needs to be that big. A 2-qt would probably have been plenty. This advice is worth what you are paying for it.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 10:41 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
spoolin2bars's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: south texas
Posts: 1,415
Total Cats: 10
Default

Originally Posted by jeff_man
+1 on that question
Yeah, you guys def. need them.
spoolin2bars is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 11:05 PM
  #70  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by spoolin2bars
Yeah, you guys def. need them.
troll troll troll your boat.
hustler is offline  
Old 01-11-2012, 09:03 AM
  #71  
Junior Member
 
GT42R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 127
Total Cats: -1
Default

2qt accusump here. 35-45psi EFC valve. No dry starting the built motor is worth it alone imo.
GT42R is offline  
Old 01-11-2012, 12:25 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rennkafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy
Id still like to go Dry sump as I think that would solve the crank case breather issues as well.
Bob
If you decide to go that route Bob, let me know. I built a bunch of dry sump systems working at the race shop in CA.

It should solve your breather issues as the breather goes straight to the oil tank, and the scavenge section of the pump tends to keep the oil from sitting up top of the engine as well.
Rennkafer is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 01:14 PM
  #73  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
wildo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 203
Total Cats: 21
Default

Originally Posted by GT42R
2qt accusump here. 35-45psi EFC valve. No dry starting the built motor is worth it alone imo.
+1

Have not had a single issue with the 35-45 EPC valve. I also have an on/off switch so I can power the car without starting it, and without dumping the oil.

Turn key. Flip switch to on. OP gauge goes to ~45 psi and slowly bleeds down. Start engine.

Minimum OP under heavy braking went from 9 PSI to 25, and average from 15-20 to 30+.
wildo is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 02:30 PM
  #74  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by wildo
+1

Have not had a single issue with the 35-45 EPC valve. I also have an on/off switch so I can power the car without starting it, and without dumping the oil.

Turn key. Flip switch to on. OP gauge goes to ~45 psi and slowly bleeds down. Start engine.

Minimum OP under heavy braking went from 9 PSI to 25, and average from 15-20 to 30+.
my pressure switch on the epc valve started acting flaky. Sometimes it wouldn’t switch on when the pressure was low so it was as if I didn’t have an accusump. I just bypassed the pressure switch and just have an on off switch on the dash. mostly just leave it on all the time I couldn’t really see where the pressure switch was really improving the way it worked if it worked properly even.

Bob
bbundy is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 02:37 PM
  #75  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Faeflora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
Default

Why is the oil pan so confused?
Faeflora is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 03:30 PM
  #76  
Junior Member
 
GT42R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 127
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy
I couldn’t really see where the pressure switch was really improving the way it worked if it worked properly even.

Bob
EPC's main benefit is in fast refilling. The valve is really just a check valve. When the epc has the valve is 'closed' it allows pressure to flow into the accusump, but not flow out. If your engine's oil pressure doesn't have to 'push' on an open valved accusump, it effectively allows it to refill the accumulator quicker.
GT42R is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nbdooey
Miata parts for sale/trade
9
08-30-2017 09:50 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
04-21-2016 03:00 PM
Aroundcorner
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
10-01-2015 03:20 PM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
09-30-2015 02:44 PM



Quick Reply: Extra baffling for the oil pan.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 AM.