Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2014, 07:42 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)

Hey,

To start with, Id like to understand how cranes work, as far as I can see a crane typically is used to take the downward force (weight) of the turbo, and help relieve the manifold of this weight.

Does it also damp vibration? Is this a key goal?

Also if a long tube manifold is tied to the engine at the turbo end, when it heats up and expands isnt the crane putting more stress on the manifold that wouldnt otherwise be there?

I had a crane made, it was quite expensive and Im annoyed that the reult was broken turbo bolts. This tells me just how much force holding the turbo in one place in relation to the engine put on the manifold, because of expansion with heat.

Heres pics.





Different car just showing mounting location.



Discuss

Dann
Attached Thumbnails ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)-10822364_736026339813115_1427719221_n.jpg   ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)-10836530_736026336479782_469461477_n.jpg   ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)-10850806_736026293146453_1069850994_n.jpg  
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-08-2014, 11:13 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

I can haz answers pwease?

Attached Thumbnails ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)-23fb4326d5e700bb5f5c63510fbf8da4_500.jpg  
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 11:24 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

This is my engineering opinion after considering the system, I've never used a turbo crane before. I think for a turbo crane to really be effective it needs to allow the manifold to flex in and out from the engine and also front to back and allow some twist. So in my mind there needs to be a pair of rod ends involved in the connection. And furthermore it should connect at more or less directly above the center of mass of the turbo setup pointing more or less straight up to reduce the moment it would generate. The trick part is really figuring out where the center of mass is once you've bolted a down pipe onto the back of the turbo since that adds weight but it also adds it own mount.

Our motors also have **** for placement options for something mounted above. Maybe a turbo "jack" would be a better idea since theres a bunch of good places to bolt to on the side of the motor.
Leafy is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 11:32 AM
  #4  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I don't know much about cranes, but IMO one of the most important parts of a turbo crane is this:



You have to accommodate the expanding/contracting metal movement.
Attached Thumbnails ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)-dedion%2520watts%2520%2520pivot%2520parts.jpg  
18psi is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:22 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

How about if it hung from a short cable?
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:32 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

If you can get a cable that will withstand the heat, with ends that are both adjustable and wont slip in the heat/vibes then go for it.
Leafy is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:36 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Mcmastercarr has some pretty cool cable ends that retain something like 98% cable strength. They are adjustable and available in stainless. 20 bucks a piece for the size I purchased on a totally unrelated project.

Edit: I just looked, the end is not actually adjustable, but it would be easy to add an adjustable link.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:42 PM
  #8  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ThePass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
Default

This kind of relates to something I've been wondering for a long time regarding turbo mount orientation. I've got a manifold from the prehistoric age, but it is a top mount - and with the addition of inconel studs, have not had any turbo -> manifold attachment issues. In nearly every first-hand case I've seen of side-mount turbos on BPs, the owner has struggled continuously - even with the standard inconel upgrades - with studs backing out, mating issues under heat, etc.

Bottom - mount setups appear to be about 50/50 in terms of users having issues or not.. so is the "least desireable" turbo orientation actually secretly the most desireable?

And more directly related to the OP topic, if I were designing a turbo brace (which I've considered a couple time but haven't seen a pressing need in my case) for a top-mount I would do a a "jack" style as Leafy puts it, supporting from below, with heim joints. For a bottom mount turbo, a crane makes the most sense.

-Ryan
__________________
Ryan Passey

Last edited by ThePass; 12-09-2014 at 01:18 PM.
ThePass is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:49 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,892
Total Cats: 399
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
This is my engineering opinion after considering the system, I've never used a turbo crane before. I think for a turbo crane to really be effective it needs to allow the manifold to flex in and out from the engine and also front to back and allow some twist. So in my mind there needs to be a pair of rod ends involved in the connection. And furthermore it should connect at more or less directly above the center of mass of the turbo setup pointing more or less straight up to reduce the moment it would generate. The trick part is really figuring out where the center of mass is once you've bolted a down pipe onto the back of the turbo since that adds weight but it also adds it own mount.

Our motors also have **** for placement options for something mounted above. Maybe a turbo "jack" would be a better idea since theres a bunch of good places to bolt to on the side of the motor.
My theory is in line with Leafy's. I also think the heims should be preloaded so I used left & right hand heims.

Attached Thumbnails ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)-lars33.jpg  
TurboTim is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 07:57 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

The brace that I posted pics of doesnt really allow any movement in any direction, and I can see heim join braces allowing movement in a set spherical path however they dont address things like the manifold moving up or down in relation to the engine when heated.

Is there any info or does someone have a folder full of photos from pro race team braces?

Cheers,
Dann
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 09:04 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

Typing "F1 turbo" into google images basically just shows a trillion triangular pyramid braces with a heim joint directly over the turbo most bolted to the rear housing.

A bunch of the manifolds look like they will move a lot under heat also..

Dann
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 09:15 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

Heres an example of a different one.



Same turbo housing mount location and style however.

Dann
Attached Thumbnails ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)-jan16004.jpg  
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 09:20 PM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,892
Total Cats: 399
Default

Damn those CHRA bearings must love the throttle before the compressor.
TurboTim is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 09:23 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

They also have quads. I think the throttle before the comp ameans the huge vacuum allows the turbo to free spin easily.
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 10:14 PM
  #15  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
Damn those CHRA bearings must love the throttle before the compressor.
Just the compressor side oil seal. All thats needed is a labyrinth seal, I say that like is easy.
Leafy is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 12:34 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
2manyhobyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Crest Hill, IL
Posts: 742
Total Cats: 42
Default

I went with the bottom support idea. :2cents
To see pic, go to post #8 most of the way down.

https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo...o-build-79259/

No issues with the bolts so far. The downpipe is also supported off the trans.
Cheers,

-Jeff
2manyhobyz is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 11:30 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Onyxyth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Boyertown, PA
Posts: 735
Total Cats: 62
Default

It seems to me that bracing the downpipe to the bellhousing would take a lot of weight off the manifold, it's interesting that this isn't used more often.
Onyxyth is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 11:48 AM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Onyxyth
It seems to me that bracing the downpipe to the bellhousing would take a lot of weight off the manifold, it's interesting that this isn't used more often.
But it also increases the force of the exhaust swinging back and forth on the on the manifold since it basically turns the whole exhaust into a lever with a pivot. The flex pipe between the brace and the rest of the exhaust only gets you some relief of this. And also making a brace for this that doesnt break on a 3" exhaust is kind of hard.

There's an older thread on the subject where I had the idea to also hard mount the exhaust to the middle or back of the PPF to completely get rid of the effect and to more or less let the whole exhaust move with the engine but no one was buying it at the time. It pretty much operates under the assumption that without miss matched mount stiffnesses (IE engine and diff mounts are allow around the same amount of flex) that the PPF doesnt get twisted all that much while driving.
Leafy is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 12:07 PM
  #19  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,176
Total Cats: 1,680
Default

I talked to JKav a good while back about bracing. If I remember correctly he was not a huge fan of cranes. Hew much preferred to use a mount that attaches to the engine block and goes up to the bottom of the turbo. I asked him for some pictures of how he was going to do it, but I never received them.
shuiend is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 12:37 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: STL
Posts: 524
Total Cats: 24
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
I talked to JKav a good while back about bracing. If I remember correctly he was not a huge fan of cranes. Hew much preferred to use a mount that attaches to the engine block and goes up to the bottom of the turbo. I asked him for some pictures of how he was going to do it, but I never received them.
That's how Mazda did it on the MSM. Turbo attaches to two of the engine mount bolts by way of ~1/4" steel bent into shape.
midpack is offline  


Quick Reply: ITT we discuss turbo cranes (again)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 PM.