Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Track brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2012, 04:02 PM
  #201  
Elite Member
 
DeerHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,981
Total Cats: 2,224
Default

Thanks Alta Racer. I won't be able to make the event on the 22nd, but I'll be at Monday's Time Attack at Stratotech. You?
DeerHunter is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 04:41 PM
  #202  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Alta_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 228
Total Cats: 7
Default

long weekend, I get to work.
Alta_Racer is offline  
Old 09-10-2012, 04:55 PM
  #203  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
dc2696's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Edmonton Ab, Canada
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Alta_Racer
Deer Hunter

After hard days at Statotech (the go cart track) my rotors look similar to the bottom pic, my brakes (94+ and XP10) work flawlessly there. I have yet to have fade, pedal loss, or bubbles bleeding after an event. I use the Prestone 5.1 fluid from CTC. It's cheap and will be upgraded this winter, when I turn up the power. For comparison to your times, I run 70 second laps, I am NA. If you know Grant with the white Mustang or Adelbert with the black GTR, we run quite close, they certainly out power me on the straights.

I think we have openings on the 22 Sept if you want more track time. 8am till noon
70's @strato is not fast enough to require any significant brake mods. I ran that on pbr ultimates (fading ever so slightly after 10min) on 94+ brakes.

Not to mention the speeds at the indy track are much higher then stratotech.
dc2696 is offline  
Old 09-10-2012, 06:35 PM
  #204  
Junior Member
 
greeenteeee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 2
Default

Are there any alternatives to these Alcon temp strips or has anyone here used them with success? Has anyone taken caliper temps for reference?

I remember reading a post stating getting them up to temp and it was barely at the minimum indicator, not much resolution. I am interested in taking temperatures pre and post ducting to see how effective I make it so I have a measurement of improvement.
My IR temp gauge maxes out as is, but it only goes up to 230-250 or so. I can get readings in the rear, but fronts it just says "HOT!"

If the Alcons would read one bar from 250F to 340F, I don't think that's much resolution (I don't think my 1.6 brakes are getting above 340F front, but staying below 230F in the rear.

Kit Consists of 14 Temp Indicator Strips with a temperature range of 250F to 536F

Recommended Brake Caliper Temps:

Up to 340ºF - Too Cool
350ºF-400ºF - Ideal
400ºF-450ºF - OK
475ºF plus - Too Hot

Tempature Indicator Strips - Alcon Brake Caliper Kit
greeenteeee is offline  
Old 09-10-2012, 06:45 PM
  #205  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
mr_hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 798
Total Cats: 24
Default

My infrared gun goes to 1500f. It isn't as accurate as test strips since everything cools some while I am coming off track instead of showing a 'high water' mark. Mainly, I look for temperature differentials front to back and side to side. I keep it in the door pocket of the truck and shoot the trailer's wheel bearings at least once during each long tow. Again, 3 bearings at +/- two degrees of each other and the 4th bearing 40 degrees hotter is all I need to know that trouble is on the horizon.
mr_hyde is offline  
Old 09-10-2012, 07:09 PM
  #206  
Junior Member
 
greeenteeee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by mr_hyde
My infrared gun goes to 1500f. It isn't as accurate as test strips since everything cools some while I am coming off track instead of showing a 'high water' mark. Mainly, I look for temperature differentials front to back and side to side. I keep it in the door pocket of the truck and shoot the trailer's wheel bearings at least once during each long tow. Again, 3 bearings at +/- two degrees of each other and the 4th bearing 40 degrees hotter is all I need to know that trouble is on the horizon.
mr_hyde, do you think an infrared gun would be better instead of a "high water" mark for what I'm looking for? (keeping 1.6L brakes for as long as i can for weight... 1.6L power, on all seasons until I am sure my driving is up to sniff). p.s. all seasons still overheat Hawk HP+

the hotter corner is exactly what i found the night before a track day. i have a small IR meter, which is probably why it's limited to 230-250*. One corner was 50 degree hotter (pax front)-- piston seized i think as i found a hole in the boot. Luckily I had a spare with a good piston boot. It got me to the track the next morning, but was having brake issues all day (on top of heat cycled tires, 80A durometer, but that's another thread). The freshly lubed slider pin probably led to this:



same tires i ran 8 months ago, when it was running 4 seconds faster (in 48-61 gnd temps). when the brakes locked up, the tires were quiet about it until i saw smoke. i think this shot was in the first few laps. i had to ease off the brakes the rest of the day with 90-125F ground temps.
Attached Thumbnails Track brakes-530231_423243631067821_230540989_n.jpg  
greeenteeee is offline  
Old 09-10-2012, 07:36 PM
  #207  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,647
Total Cats: 3,009
Default

My IR gun from Harbor Freight was $29 and goes up to 500+ I think. It shows enough info to be useful, including trans and diff temps. Temp strips would be useful for showing peaks as stated.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 09-11-2012, 03:17 AM
  #208  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,390
Total Cats: 63
Default

Measuring rotor temp is best done with paint on the edge.
E.g. https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/gr...upID=TEMPPAINT
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 09-11-2012, 07:47 PM
  #209  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by greeenteeee
mr_hyde, do you think an infrared gun would be better instead of a "high water" mark for what I'm looking for? (keeping 1.6L brakes for as long as i can for weight... 1.6L power, on all seasons until I am sure my driving is up to sniff). p.s. all seasons still overheat Hawk HP+
All seasons are gonna be harder on your brakes than race tires.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 09-11-2012, 08:14 PM
  #210  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
All seasons are gonna be harder on your brakes than race tires.

--Ian
Strongly disagree. It's approximately the same amount of kinetic energy being converted to heat, but the conversion happens in a far more compacted amount of time with race tires, resulting in higher peak temperatures.
Savington is offline  
Old 09-11-2012, 08:36 PM
  #211  
Junior Member
 
Handy Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 20
Default

On the other hand. Your corner speed will be WAY lower but your acceleration will be largely unaffected, so you will have to brake more to slow down to that corner speed.
Handy Man is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:08 AM
  #212  
Junior Member
 
one-niner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denmark
Posts: 80
Total Cats: 1
Default

The energy needed to accelerate is roughly the same that the brakes need to convert to heat during braking (minus some wind/rolling/transmission resistance). On the stickier tires, the overall speed around the track is higher, which actually leaves less time to build up energy between corners, which the brakes then need to deal with. On the other hand, you can start accelerating earlier out of the corners, which comes more into play on a high speed track with soft curves.

Now, the real issue is the time needed for the heat to move from the brake rotors to the air cooling them. On stickier tires there is simply less time between braking, so the heat will build up faster and generally sit at a higher level than on street tires.

- Tom
one-niner is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 12:51 PM
  #213  
Elite Member
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Strongly disagree. It's approximately the same amount of kinetic energy being converted to heat, but the conversion happens in a far more compacted amount of time with race tires, resulting in higher peak temperatures.
But is it the higher peak temperature or the amount of time at elevated temp with brakes applied that wears out the brakes.

Higher delta T means a faster heat rejection rate will occur and less distance on the brakes in the braking zone means more percentage of time off the brakes to reject heat and less percentage of the time generating it.

Bob
bbundy is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 01:19 PM
  #214  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by Handy Man
On the other hand. Your corner speed will be WAY lower but your acceleration will be largely unaffected, so you will have to brake more to slow down to that corner speed.
If cornering speeds are higher, straightaway speeds will be higher.

Originally Posted by one-niner
Now, the real issue is the time needed for the heat to move from the brake rotors to the air cooling them. On stickier tires there is simply less time between braking, so the heat will build up faster and generally sit at a higher level than on street tires.
Originally Posted by bbundy
Higher delta T means a faster heat rejection rate will occur and less distance on the brakes in the braking zone means more percentage of time off the brakes to reject heat and less percentage of the time generating it.
Eh, that's debatable. The laps are shorter, but the braking zones are more compacted. You would need to look at actual data to know whether the brakes have the same amount of time to shed the heat or not.

In any case, you also need to look at the force applied - since you're producing (essentially) the same amount of heat, but doing it in a shorter period of time, the force required to make that heat is higher, and this is going to wear on the brakes.

At the end of the day, the difference in heat rejection vs. heat production times is probably negligible, but the race-tire car is going to have brakes that are pushed harder and operated at higher tempeatures than the street car. That's going to cause additional wear.
Savington is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 04:46 PM
  #215  
Junior Member
 
Handy Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
If cornering speeds are higher, straightaway speeds will be higher.
Of course, but "higher" is a relative term. Say a street tire car corners 10mph slower than a race tire car. The race tire car will exit the corner 10mph faster, however all cars accelerate faster at lower speeds. Therefore at the end of the straight the race tire car will only be going slightly faster than the street tire car, say 3mph faster.

10mph > 3mph

Of course this all depends on the track. The longer the straight the more pronounced the effect, and whether or not this effect is greater than the other effects you mentioned is beyond anyone's guesstimating ability.

A simple way to think about it would be a track in which the car reaches its top speed on every straight (something like Indy's oval with an under geared car). Obviously in that scenario race tires would always be easier on your brakes.
Handy Man is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 11:16 PM
  #216  
Junior Member
 
greeenteeee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
If cornering speeds are higher, straightaway speeds will be higher.

Eh, that's debatable. The laps are shorter, but the braking zones are more compacted.
For what it's worth, here's what I noticed btwn mine and others at BW 13CW I average about 90-95s at the top of the straights (stock 1.6L + exh), for a 2:21 on all seasons (2:21, more time on table, messed up on sunset before the lap even started). The Street Class Miata is a 1.8L on 225 RS-3s that sees about 105s in the corners for a 2:08. A friend's S2000 hits about 105s in the straights but is obv slower overall with merely 2:14-2:16 (255 advans), and he and I corner at similar speeds in my Miata. I have to scrub speed and brake earlier to hit a slower corner speed which inevitably kills top speed.

I was planning on staying with 1.6L brakes for weight, have 1.8L brackets ready and waiting, and I know they'll have better heat capacity overall, but whether I need it yet or not is TBD on pad and tire (currently Hawk HP+ which have lasted pretty long that I started dailying them). I planned on doing some ducts before slapping the 1.8L rotors on, mainly so I can gauge how effective the ducts are. I know the cooler the brakes are the longer pads will last etc, but so far with all seasons and HP+, it hasn't been an issue. I sure would like some Wilwoods for many reasons but it's just not in the cards. Please let me know if I'm going about this all wrong and that I should toss the 1.8s on ASAP regardless of if I've ducted the brakes yet or not.
greeenteeee is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 11:51 PM
  #217  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by Handy Man
Of course, but "higher" is a relative term. Say a street tire car corners 10mph slower than a race tire car. The race tire car will exit the corner 10mph faster, however all cars accelerate faster at lower speeds. Therefore at the end of the straight the race tire car will only be going slightly faster than the street tire car, say 3mph faster.
It's not a 7mph delta. Try 1-2mph. I only know this because it's one of the most obvious things when you compare data between two drivers - a driver who carries 3mph off a corner will typically still be traveling 2 or 2.5mph faster at the end of a long straightaway than a driver who can't carry that extra 3mph.

In the end, cars do accelerate slower at higher speeds, but it's not nearly that large of a difference.
Savington is offline  
Old 09-21-2012, 02:32 PM
  #218  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: STL
Posts: 524
Total Cats: 24
Default

Joined the manly brakes club last night after ending Hallett with a slight taper up front on Hawk Blues. Holy **** does the car stop. Need to tweak bias valve a bit, the rear blues don't stand a chance against DTCs on a 11.75" rotor.

Big thanks to Andrew, had a tracking number not an hour after ordering. Getting threads started on the front line coupler was the hardest part of the entire install.

Anybody want to sell their rear 1.8 brackets?
midpack is offline  
Old 09-24-2012, 01:25 PM
  #219  
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Rallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lexington SC
Posts: 1,176
Total Cats: 35
Default

I recently did a track day weekend at CMP with freshly rebuilt Na 1.8 on XP10/XP8 pads and noticed slight taper on the front pads, nothing like earlier pictures in this thread. I was not expecting this on factory power. The rotors looked like the snotty picture on post #197. I started with fresh rotors and after the first session I had the snotty rotor surface again.
What causes the snotty surface? Does it cause you to use more pedal pressure and greater force on the pad that then flexes the stock caliper more and result in the pad taper?
The funds for the awesome 11.75" BBK will not be avaliable any time soon, so that isn't really an option at this time.
How long do the XP10/8 pads last on NA power levels? Looks like I will only get 5 track days out of the ones I am running.
Rallas is offline  
Old 09-24-2012, 02:08 PM
  #220  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,390
Total Cats: 63
Default

Originally Posted by relte
How long do the XP10/8 pads last on NA power levels? Looks like I will only get 5 track days out of the ones I am running.
About 5 hours would be what I'd expect, not more (rears will last longer, almost twice).
Add cooling and you will get a lot more time out of them.
NiklasFalk is offline  


Quick Reply: Track brakes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.