Supercharger Discussion For all you misguided souls.

What's wrong with superchargers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2012, 10:20 PM
  #101  
Junior Member
 
guttedmiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 440
Total Cats: 3
Default

http://i1340.photobucket.com/albums/...ps9c7d72b2.jpg

Let's try this.
guttedmiata is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:23 PM
  #102  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Whats the setup? What supercharger?
18psi is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:26 PM
  #103  
Junior Member
 
guttedmiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 440
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Whats the setup? What supercharger?
basic setup is in my signature. almost stock 1.8, 1.2 lysholm water cooled, big injectors, E85, megasquirt.
guttedmiata is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:26 PM
  #104  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Output curve isnt very linear, more like exponential. This is a dyno graph that give linear output.

Attached Thumbnails What's wrong with superchargers?-2010_ford_taurus_sho_ecoboost_power-curve.jpg  
Leafy is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:31 PM
  #105  
Junior Member
 
guttedmiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 440
Total Cats: 3
Default

The other contributor to the power drop off is prob exhaust as well. When it was a turbo car, we got by with a glasspack and it was well under db limits. We had to throw a basic dual chamber muffle tank on the back quickly to be ready for nationals after going to the charger. Way too loud with just the glasspack. THat's an area of attention over the winter as well.

Forgot to mention in the basic set up - ebay chinese header.
guttedmiata is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:54 PM
  #106  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

lol I love how you totally make it sound like a "basic" setup.

Oh, its only a near stock (but built) bottom end, 99 head, larger than most supercharger, 1000cc injectors, e85, etc......

Nothing special.

For the money you spent a similarly equipped turbo car would rape your face. In anything but auto-x. Which is what pretty much everyone in this thread has said dozens of times: no one is arguing that for auto-x a big 'ol sc is good.
But for everything else....well, you know the rest.
18psi is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:58 PM
  #107  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
viperormiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
Default

Have you looked into the Borg Warner EFR's? You can have your cake and eat it too.
viperormiata is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:05 PM
  #108  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

And push 300 hp at 35psi like a bauce
triple88a is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:19 PM
  #109  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
codingparadox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 360
Total Cats: 10
Default

I'll never do turbo for the street again after having fun with a supercharger. Planting the throttle at 2500 RPMs and having 250 ft/lbs at the wheels is fun. For peak numbers, sure, have a turbo. For actually having fun accelerating hard between 25 and 40mph, good luck on a turbo.
codingparadox is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 09-30-2012, 11:36 PM
  #110  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by codingparadox
I'll never do turbo for the street again after having fun with a supercharger. Planting the throttle at 2500 RPMs and having 250 ft/lbs at the wheels is fun. For peak numbers, sure, have a turbo. For actually having fun accelerating hard between 25 and 40mph, good luck on a turbo.

Show us a dyno with 250wtq at 2500RPM.

I also see you're running this dog-****:

lol
Attached Thumbnails What's wrong with superchargers?-shock1.jpg   What's wrong with superchargers?-e2nb7.jpg  
hustler is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:48 PM
  #111  
Junior Member
 
guttedmiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 440
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
lol I love how you totally make it sound like a "basic" setup.

Oh, its only a near stock (but built) bottom end, 99 head, larger than most supercharger, 1000cc injectors, e85, etc......

Nothing special.

For the money you spent a similarly equipped turbo car would rape your face. In anything but auto-x. Which is what pretty much everyone in this thread has said dozens of times: no one is arguing that for auto-x a big 'ol sc is good.
But for everything else....well, you know the rest.
There's a difference between a "basic" set up ane what I meant meaning that the basics of my set up are thus.... leaving out the details - just the basics.

Besides, the engine itself is pretty basic. The "99 head" is a stock head. The bottom end is not built in my opinion with "only" rods. Stock crank, stock pan, stock pickup, stock bearings, stock pistons, stock wrist pins, stock rings, stock bore, stock stroke, stock stock stock.

....and money? less than $2000. used lysholm charger. home fabbed piping. home fabbed manifold. home fabbed pully. cheap rca low imp injectors. etc....
guttedmiata is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:48 PM
  #112  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
codingparadox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 360
Total Cats: 10
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
Show us a dyno with 250wtq at 2500RPM.

I also see you're running this dog-****:
lol
Only dynoed at around 200wtq at 2500RPM right now, and this was before I cleaned up some of the fueling down low. Bigger SC soon and a boost bump, should be closer to 250. Either way, since you're attacking shocks you don't understand, you're obviously just trolling, so I won't bother answering further than this.
codingparadox is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:51 PM
  #113  
Junior Member
 
guttedmiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 440
Total Cats: 3
Default

show me a TURBO dyno with 250lb-ft at 2500rpm that's usable power other than with slicks on a dragstrip.
guttedmiata is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:53 PM
  #114  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
codingparadox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 360
Total Cats: 10
Default

Originally Posted by guttedmiata
ummm.... that would NOT be from my car. Even if it were, what does that have to do with power, dynos, a turbo, a supercharger, or anything related to the choice of powerplant at all. Put the crack pipe down and step away from the computer.
Those are the FatCat shocks from my car. He's just trolling random stuff since he's a standard supercharger hater. It hurts his turbopeen. It's a little frustrating that he's a moderator and still trolling this poorly.
codingparadox is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:53 PM
  #115  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by guttedmiata
ummm.... that would NOT be from my car. Even if it were, what does that have to do with power, dynos, a turbo, a supercharger, or anything related to the choice of powerplant at all. Put the crack pipe down and step away from the computer.
Not every post in this thread is about you.
hustler is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:57 PM
  #116  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by codingparadox
Only dynoed at around 200wtq at 2500RPM right now, and this was before I cleaned up some of the fueling down low. Bigger SC soon and a boost bump, should be closer to 250. Either way, since you're attacking shocks you don't understand, you're obviously just trolling, so I won't bother answering further than this.
So what you're saying is "I don't have a dyno that shows 250wtq@2500rpm". My point exactly.
Originally Posted by codingparadox
Those are the FatCat shocks from my car. He's just trolling random stuff since he's a standard supercharger hater. It hurts his turbopeen. It's a little frustrating that he's a moderator and still trolling this poorly.
It's about perspective.
I'm turboless these days and loving it:

I had a great turbo car, it didn't make 250wtq@2500rpm, it made that at 3100. I haven't seen a supercharger I'd want on a Miata, probably never will.
I'm the best troll, lol. It's what I do.
Attached Thumbnails What's wrong with superchargers?-dscn2503.jpg  
hustler is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:58 PM
  #117  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by codingparadox
Those are the FatCat shocks from my car. He's just trolling random stuff since he's a standard supercharger hater. It hurts his turbopeen. It's a little frustrating that he's a moderator and still trolling this poorly.
Hustler is N/A. He's the anti-boost.
Leafy is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:59 PM
  #118  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by guttedmiata
show me a TURBO dyno with 250lb-ft at 2500rpm that's usable power other than with slicks on a dragstrip.
No one needs 250wtq@2500rpm on the street nor a grown-up racetrack. If you want to drive around a parking lot in one gear, then you need all the torque you can get. I also never claimed to have that dyno-sheet for e-bragging.
hustler is offline  
Old 10-01-2012, 12:00 AM
  #119  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Hustler is N/A. He's the anti-boost.
I'm anti-FI for track cars when you don't have enough cash to pay someone like TSE to maintain the thing. I loved the turbo set-up, but my life is different these days and I don't have the skills or classing to be nationally competitive in TTB. I may have those skills in the near future and the wallet to be nationally competitive in a 180whp NA Miata.
hustler is offline  
Old 10-01-2012, 12:01 AM
  #120  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
codingparadox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 360
Total Cats: 10
Default

Leafy is everywhere.

I don't really need to convince anyone of anything with turbos vs. superchargers. My SSM car is freaking fun to drive on the street. From a roll at 30mph in third it hits like a truck as soon as you touch the gas. That's fun for me. I used to play with turbos, both little ones in WRX's and big ones in Alltracs and MR2s and Supras. I'll never go back other than for a dedicated track car. For anything other than arrest-me-now 60-100mph pulls (which are fun, but ... yeah, gonna get arrested for it someday), superchargers are way more fun for me.
codingparadox is offline  


Quick Reply: What's wrong with superchargers?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM.