Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain discuss the wondrous effects of boost and your miata...
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (or similar)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2012, 03:13 AM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
mitch_f1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (or similar)?

So my bushes are old and crap, and I am thinking of replacing them, but I am torn between new OEM rubber ones, or getting poly (or similar) bushes. I know that poly bushes are supposed to be better for handling, and you can get the offset ones, but I've heard they need to be re-greased and all that jazz, so require more maintenance than the rubber alternative. So I was wondering if it is really worth the hassel?

I know there are a million other threads on this topic, but I am asking if anyone has driven a car with brand new rubber bushes, and then driven a car with poly bushes? Is there much of a difference?
mitch_f1 is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 03:18 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
_spyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
Total Cats: 1
Default

"Bushes"
_spyder is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 03:19 AM
  #3  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
mitch_f1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default



Those things
Attached Thumbnails Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (or similar)?-dc7000-yellow-polyurethane-bush-kit-discovery-1.jpg  
mitch_f1 is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 03:53 AM
  #4  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,175
Total Cats: 1,129
Default

Bushings. Can't help you otherwise, I'm still on OEM bushings from 1993.

Edit: I can say however, that the difference between old and rubber is going to be roughly the same as new and poly. Or you'll have a giant leap in performance from old to poly.

AFAIK, poly bushes (I like it, we're keeping it) are great most of the time, except when they transmit road noise, bumps, and jolts through the chassis that rubber bushes would normally absorb.
curly is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 04:00 AM
  #5  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
mitch_f1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

As for the noisy and bumps aspect; a friend has poly bushes in his car, and it is actually more comfy and less jolty/noisy than mine, and he has stiffer swaybars and springs than me!!
mitch_f1 is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 11:50 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
thasac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mass.
Posts: 811
Total Cats: 43
Default

Originally Posted by mitch_f1
As for the noisy and bumps aspect; a friend has poly bushes in his car, and it is actually more comfy and less jolty/noisy than mine, and he has stiffer swaybars and springs than me!!
There's too many variables within a suspension to isolate the 'bushes' as the cause.

In my limited experience driving a number of cars with and without poly 'bushes' lead me to draw the following conclusions:

1. A reasonable durometer poly bushing almost always improves NHV over old shitty bushings. Why? ...beyond general tolerance change from wear or tearing, the rubber hardens effectively increasing the durometer. A lot of spec guys actually seek out old hardened OEM bushings for this reason (less 'slop' due to less compression). The increased durometer translates to increased NHV. I've held old bushings out of an Arizona/New Mexico NA which felt like Delrin (minus the lubricity)

2. If you daily drive your car in any environment with lots of water/snow/salt you HAVE to install grease fittings. There are few things as annoying as a squeaky poly bushing. It also means it's not freely rotating in the control arm which is bad news bears.

3. New Rubber vs. New Poly bushings ... NHV is primarily dependent on the durometer of each. They are functionally different, so poly should provide a more predictable (and tune-able) suspension (since rubber pre-loads). This being said, if both have the same durometer there shouldn't be a significant difference in NHV so general driving will feel essentially the same.


For a year round daily driver I'd go with OEM rubber or graphite empregnated poly with grease fittings.

For a track car, I'd go with poly with grease fittings (so long as the rules allow for it)

Ultimately, your shock dampening/rebound is going to have a far greater effect on NHV. It's the reason why 400lb springs can feel 'plush' when used with the proper combination of shock and why <200lb springs can feel like total sh*t on OEM Bilstein HDs. Bushings play a small part in over all 'harshness' ... unless of course there's something critically wrong such as a tear of rot.

-Zach
thasac is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 11:53 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
thasac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mass.
Posts: 811
Total Cats: 43
Default

...and to clarify: NHV = Noise Harshness Vibration


I work with so many engineers, I forget the world doesn't operate solely in acronyms

-Zach
thasac is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 11:54 AM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

Ha! I'm on OEM bushings from 1990. I just received a compliment from a fellow forum member on how nicely my car rides and handles. He wanted to know the brand of bushings I was using so he could install the same thing!

Also, the grapevine says that some Spec Miata types prefer old rubber bushings to new. The theory goes that the older rubber has hardened. Have no idea whether this is good information or gibberish. The question I would ask is what do the race winners run?

To go along with that, part of the grapevine swears by poly, while the other part swears that they would never do poly again (maintenance and noise).

Don't you just love the grapevine?

Anyway, with all the conflicting information and all the compliments I get on my ride quality, I think I'll just stay put.

One other option, FM is selling a harder rubber bushing kit -- similar to the Mazdaspeed bushings but at a much better price.
hornetball is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 12:53 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
RyanRaduechel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oakdale, CA
Posts: 1,394
Total Cats: 123
Default

Hey Curly...would it be worth replacing my 1990 bushes? I have all the suspension torn down because I am going to paint it and I inspected the bushes and to be honest they look fine. The steel sleeves are still nice and solid, nothing is sloppy. I am going to be tracking the car and I am just trying to figure out if it is worth doing it now since it is all torn apart. If I were to replace them I would be using Energy Suspension polyurethane bushes.
RyanRaduechel is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 08:33 PM
  #10  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,175
Total Cats: 1,129
Default

Oh I have no idea. I have plenty of track time and it sounds like our bushings are in similar shape.

It's just $300 and way too many hours and lots of frustration. It's well documented how much life sucks with some types of bushings and street driving, but you'll be hard pressed to find the facts about them decreasing your lap times.

Will they be faster? Probably. I doubt it's enough to justify the price, time, and frustration. Then again I'm lazy, so I've made enough of these decisions to probably add up to a lot of lap time sacrifices.
curly is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 09:37 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
RyanRaduechel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oakdale, CA
Posts: 1,394
Total Cats: 123
Default

Thanks for the honest input. I think I am going to go ahead and do them, just because the suspension is already torn down. Just another piece to the puzzle I suppose.
RyanRaduechel is offline  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:51 PM
  #12  
Newb
 
chewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 31
Total Cats: 0
Default

I got my set of prothane bushings from ebay and if I didn't get sick during the middle of the swap I would have had them done in a couple of days.

I drilled and tapped in a set of zerk/grease fittings as well just to make sure I could service them easily.

It's not that hard to do, and I got my set for 130$ AND my car became more crisp and connected but better over harsh bumps.

fyi: my car's bushings had 95k on them and still not very hard.
chewy is offline  
Old 09-01-2012, 12:54 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
DaveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: finger lakes NY
Posts: 433
Total Cats: 17
Default

My personal subjective opinion is that the poly bushes ride BETTER than rubber because they allow the suspension to move instead of having to twist a block of rubber.

I used Energy Suspension grease and have had no squeaks after 2 summers and 20k miles. I admit, though, that I did use A LOT of grease; 1/2 of a large can from 949racing.com
DaveC is offline  
Old 09-01-2012, 01:07 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Handy Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 20
Default

you could always get rid of the "bushes" completely

Attached Thumbnails Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (or similar)?-0702_4wd_14_z%252b2007_jeep_wrangler_suspension_install%252bheim_joint.jpg  
Handy Man is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
asmasm
Build Threads
82
05-26-2016 04:37 PM
mx592
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
1
10-01-2015 12:45 AM
Midtenn
Miata parts for sale/trade
5
09-28-2015 02:02 PM



Quick Reply: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (or similar)?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 AM.