Is there a verdict on the bumper cut?
I'm building up a HDPE/TimeAttack/Autocross car and i am open to the bumper cut but can't find anywhere that it has any positive impact.
Even looking at well respected cars it is about a 50/50 thing. What are the thought here? |
A tiny amount.
The big factor is for Time trial will it bump you up in class? |
IIRC Emilio stated they haven't found any advantage to the bumper cut/removal other than shedding weight off the back of the car.
|
Originally Posted by Midtenn
(Post 1558659)
IIRC Emilio stated they haven't found any advantage to the bumper cut/removal other than shedding weight off the back of the car.
I did it to mine because I like how it looks... *shrugs* |
Originally Posted by Midtenn
(Post 1558659)
IIRC Emilio stated they haven't found any advantage to the bumper cut/removal other than shedding weight off the back of the car.
|
Kyle did a couple videos on this using a Miata for the CFD. It's a bit confusing because the numbers don't match in the first and second videos, but I think that's because he refined the CFD model between them.
Briefly, the bumper cut helped a bit, both with and without a flat floor. |
I believe there was someone on ClubRoadster who did a finite element analysis of a cut rear bumper on an NA and calculated there was a 7 pound decrease of drag at 75 mph, amounting to a 1.4 horsepower improvement. Not a large increase but not much cost, either.
|
+ Adds lightness (any lightness is a good thing in an MX5)
+ Looks cool (unless you "butcher it" or take too much off) + Prevents your bumper from burning if your 3" exhaust is too close to the OEM bumper |
Originally Posted by amptramp
(Post 1607359)
I believe there was someone on ClubRoadster who did a finite element analysis of a cut rear bumper on an NA and calculated there was a 7 pound decrease of drag at 75 mph, amounting to a 1.4 horsepower improvement. Not a large increase but not much cost, either.
But hey, that unknown source used the words "finite element analysis", so it must be valid.. |
Originally Posted by thebeerbaron
(Post 1607368)
But hey, that unknown source used the words "finite element analysis", so it must be valid..
I should know better than to use use irony ... :nono: For clarity, and the person who gave me the negcat, CFD (aka Computational Fluid Dynamics) is the software used for aero analysis, FEA is for stress analysis. |
Originally Posted by Blkbrd69
(Post 1558630)
A tiny amount.
The big factor is for Time trial will it bump you up in class? From the TT5-6 rules (also applies to TT1-4) 4) Cutting/removal of the rear bumper cover/fascia where it does not cover the rear frame/bumper cross beam |
Originally Posted by amptramp
(Post 1607359)
I believe there was someone on ClubRoadster who did a finite element analysis of a cut rear bumper on an NA and calculated there was a 7 pound decrease of drag at 75 mph, amounting to a 1.4 horsepower improvement. Not a large increase but not much cost, either.
There's no way it's that effective. You need to provide your source. For reference, an APR GT250 wing (same one used in the Singular wing kit) by itself generates approximately 7lbs of drag at 75mph at about 4° angle of attack. |
So I just searched for over an hour for this 7lb at 75 mph research project. Couldn't find it be did find this
https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/fo...s/97287/page1/ https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...c21b59ec50.png |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands